Contrasting of CSR Strategies self-presentations and consumers expectations in Serbia

  • Radmila D Čurčić University "Union-Nikola Tesla" Belgrade, Serbia, Faculty for industrial business management, Belgrade
  • Ljiljana Z Miletić University Educons, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, Faculty for project and innovation management, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Miroslav J Bjegović University Educons, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, Faculty for project and innovation management, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: Strategy, Socialism, Motivation, Consumers,

Abstract


Corporate social responsibility (CSR), as a widely accepted approach is often applied by the companies not only to create a social impact but also as a powerful tool to create the image of the company among customers and increase its visibility. In order to contrast the CSR concepts of leading companies in Serbia as a country in a long-lasting post-socialist transition with the consumer expectations search of web based self-presentations of leading companies in Serbia and questionnaire among consumers were used in present research. Obtained results point out that self-presentation of CSR programs by the leading companies in Serbia is in collision with consumers expectations in respect to both, presented CSR motives and emphasized CSR activities. Companies are mainly emphasizing performance driven motives for CSR, while consumers rate higher the motives related to stakeholders and value based motives. Environment protection is the only activity recognized with similar importance by the companies and by the consumers. Consumers expectations are highest in respect to stakeholder related CSR including consumers, employees and suppliers, while the companies rarely emphasize these aspects of CSR. Oppositely, support for social issues and donations employed very frequently by the companies do not meet high consumers’ expectations.

References

Arli, D. I. & Lasmono H. K. (2010). Consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 46-51.

Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D. & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248-2

Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T. & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437-445

Brown, T. J. & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), p68-84

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967

Carrigan, M. & Attalla, A. (2001) The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-577

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48

Creyer, E. H., Ross, Jr. & William, T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 419-432

Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192-211

Ellen, P., Webb, D. & Mohr L. (2006). Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157.

Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R. & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived Organizational Motives and Consumer Responses to Proactive and Reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 639–652

Jamali, D. (2007). The Case for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries. Business & Society Review, 112(1), 1-27

Karem Kolkailah, S., Abou Aish, E. & El‐Bassiouny, N. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility initiatives on consumers' behavioural intentions in the Egyptian market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(4), 369-384.

Koleva, P., Rodet-Kroichvili, N., David, P. & Marasova, J. (2010). Is corporate social responsibility the privilege of developed market economies? Some evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The international journal of human resource management, 21(2), 274-293.

Lafferty, B. A. & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause--brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423-429

Lee, M-D.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73

Luo, X. & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18

Maignan, I. & Ferrell, O.C. (2000). Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297

Maignan, I. & Ralston, D.A. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US,: Insights from Businesses' Self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514

Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57-72

Podnar, K. & Golob, U. (2007). CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12, 326–340.

Pomering, A., Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: are consumer aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.

Ross, III J. K., Patterson, L. T. & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93-98

Stoian, C., Zaharia, R.M. (2012). CSR development in post‐communist economies: employees' expectations regarding corporate socially responsible behaviour–the case of Romania. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(4), 380-401.

Strahilevitz, M. & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446

Uusitalo, O. & Oksanen, R. (2004). Ethical consumerism: a view from Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 28 (3), 214-221

Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M. and Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, 42 (9/10), 927-953

Vlachos, P., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. & Avramidis, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 170–180.

Williams, G. & Zinkin, J. (2008). The effect of culture on consumers' willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: applying Hofstede's typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 210-226

Wood D. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review. 16(4), 691-718.

Xiaoli, N. (2007). Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment: A Construal Level Perspective. Human Communication Research, 33 (4), 489-514

Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z. & Schwarz N. (2006). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 16 (4), 377-390.

Published
2016/05/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper