The impact of Privatisation – Empiric analysis and results in Serbian industry

  • Ivan Nikolic Economics Institute, Belgrade
  • Miladin Kovačević Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia
Keywords: Productivity, Value-added contribution, Serbian, Privatization, Industries,

Abstract


The privatization concept, applied after the 2000 changes, failed to bring the expected performance to Serbian industry. Privatization partly initiated the enterprises restructuring in some fields of manufacturing industry. It brought fresh capital, new technologies and new managerial know-how. However, the result thereof was far weaker than the initially expected. The reasons for the said, but also the end aims of the given process, are analyzed in detail throughout the following article. The research is based on the processing of data from financial statements, submitted by the companies from the Serbian non-financial corporate sector in the period 2002-2007. Panel analysis disclosed the way in which the results of each of the observed ownership forms have changed over time in different sectors and branches of the industry. On the other hand, we also tested the hypothesis according to which privatization effects on the companies’ performances significantly vary depending on the company size, whereby the effects of capital sales model have been implicitly assessed.

References

Aghion, P. et al, (1994), The behaviour of state firms in eastern Europe, pre-privatisation, European Economic Review, 38, 1327-49;

Baldwin, R. et al, (1997) The Cost and Benefits of Eastern Enlargement: The Impact on the EU and Central Europe, Economic Policy, 12(24): 125-176;

Benett, J. et al, (2007) Privatization Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies, Forthcoming in Economics of Transition;

Bevan, A. et al, (1999) Determinants of Enterprise Performance during Transition, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Working Paper 99/03;

Birdsall, N. et al, (2003) Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization, World Development, 31(10): 1617-33;

Bishop, M. et al, (1988) Does Privatisation Work? Lessons from the UK, London: Centre for Business Strategy, London Business School;

Blanchard, O. et al, (1991) Reform in Eastern Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press;

Bogićević B. et al, (2003) Effects of privatisation in Serbia – First preliminary results, Privatisation of enterprises and banks, Belgrade, Faculty of economics and Scientific association of economists (in Serbian);

Commander S. et al, (2007) Do Institutions, Ownership, Exporting and Competition Explain Firm Performance? Evidence from 26 Transition Countries, IPC Working Paper No. 28. International Policy Center, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan;

Djankov, S. et al, (2002) Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3): 739-92;

EBRD, Transition Report, different issues;

Estrin, S. et al, (2009) Effect of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4811, p.48;

Gouret, F. (2007) Privatization and output behaviour during the transition: Methods matter! Journal of Comparative Economics, 35: 3-34;

Havrylyshyn, O. et al, (1999) Privatization in Transition Countries: A Sampling of the Literature, IMF WP/99/6, p.44;

Jeffrey, M. (2006) Evaluation of Mass Privatization in Bulgaria, William Davidson Institute WP 814;

Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Metropolitan Books, New York, p. 576;

Kornai, J. (1990) The Road to a Free Economy Shifting from a Socialist System: The Example of Hungary, New York: W.W. Norton;

Kovačević, M. and Nikolić, I. (2010), Structural business indicators of Serbian enterprises from 2002 to 2007 with focus on privatised enterprises – Review, pp 97-113, Collected papers from the conference Finalised privatisation – consequences for economic development and unemployment in Serbia, Institute of economic sciences, Belgrade (in Serbian);

Lafont, J. et al, (1993) A theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press;

Lipton, D. et al, (1990) Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990(1): 75-147;

Marić, Z. (2008) Direct foreign investment and productivity of the Croatian industrial enterprises, research paper, Economic trends and economic policy 116/2008, Zagreb (in Croatian);

Megison, W. et al, (2001) From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization, Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2): 321-389;

Nikolić, I. (2010) Privatisation in Serbia – from euphoric enthusiasm to disappointment (original research paper), Industrija, god. XXXVIII, no 4, Institute of economics, Belgrade, pp 69-95;

Sabirianova, K. et al, (2005) Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard? William Davidson Institute WP 734;

Shirley, M. et al, (2001) Public vs. Private Ownership: Current State of the Debate, World Bank Policy Research Paper 2420;

Shleifer, A. et al, (1994) Politicians and Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109:4: 995-1025;

Simoneti, M. et al, (2004) Managerial Ownership and Corporate Performance in Slovenian Post-privatisation Period, European Journal of Comparative Economics, 1(2): 217-41;

Svejnar, J. (1989) A Framework for the Economic Transformation of Czechoslovakia, PlanEcon Report, 5(52): 1-18;

Svejnar, J. (2002) Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 3-28;

Vining, A. et al, (1992) Ownership vs. Competition: Efficiency in Public Enterprise, Public Choice, 73(2): 205-39;

Zinnes, C. et al, (2001) The Gains from Privatization in Transition Economies: Is Change of Ownership Enough? IMF Staff Papers 48(0): 146-170.

Published
2014/04/09
Section
Original Scientific Paper