EVALUACIJA KURSA MANDIBULARNOG KANALA U POPULACIJI JUGOISTOČNE SRBIJE – STUDIJA KOMPIJUTERIZOVANE TOMOGRAFIJE KONUSNOG ZRAKA

Evaluacija kursa mandibularnog kanala

Ključne reči: Mandibula, mandibularni kanal, anatomske varijacije, CBCT.

Sažetak


Uvod: Oralno hirurške intervencije u regiji mandibule zahtevaju detaljno poznavanje položaja i kursa mandibularnog kanala. Cilj ovog rada je bio da se odredi najčešći kurs mandibularnog kanala na snimcima kompjuterizovane tomografije konusnog zraka (CBCT) u populaciji jugoistočne Srbije.

Materijal i metode: U studiji je analizirano 194 CBCT snimaka mandibularnih kanala 97 pacijenta (48 muškaraca i 49 žena) starosne dobi od 18-65 godina. Kursevi mandibularnih kanala su prema Worthingtonu klasifikovani na zakrivljene, poniruće i prave. Dobijeni rezultati su analizirani u odnosu na pol i starost pacijenata kao i u odnosu na levu i desnu stranu mandibule.

Rezultati: Najčešći kurs mandibularnog kanala na analiziranim snimcima je bio zakrivljeni (41,2%) potom prav (37,1%) dok je najmanje zastupljen bio ponirući (21,6%). Kod muškaraca je najzastupljeniji bio zakrivljeni tip (46,9%), dok je kod žena najzastupljeniji bio prav (39,6%). Statistička analiza nije pokazala značajnu razliku u distribuciji tipova kursa mandibularnog kanala u odnosu na pol i starost pacijenata, kao i na stranu mandibule.

Zaključak: Uočene varijacije naglašavaju značaj pažljive individualne preoperativne analize CBCT snimaka svakog pacijenta, kao i planiranja različitih operativnih pristupa u regiji mandibule.

Reference

1. Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi KS et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int 2023;98(2):176–84.
2. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida JJ, Cariseo C, Gold M et al. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2021;43(8):1259–72.
3. Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J 2020;39(2):167–72.
4. Zahedi S, Mostafavi M, Lotfirikan N. Anatomic Study of Mandibular Posterior Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Endodontic Surgery. J Endod 2018;44(5):738–43.
5. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 2018;18(1):88.
6. Kovisto T, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to the Tooth Apex. J Endod 2011;37(3):311–5.
7. Kawashima Y, Sakai O, Shosho D et al. Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone. J Endod 2016;42(2):221–4.
8. Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(5):731–4.
9. Razi T, Emamverdizadeh P, Nilavar N et al. Comparison of the Hounsfield Unit in CT scan with the Gray Level in cone-beam CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2019;13(3):177–82.
10. Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44(4):273.
11. Ozturk A, Potluri A, Vieira AR. Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113(4):453–8.
12. Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(11):1212–8.
13. Okiriamu A, Butt F, Opondo F et al. Morphology and Variant Anatomy of the Mandibular Canal in a Kenyan Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Craniomaxillofac Res Innov 2023;8:275284642311827.
14. Almahdi HM, Alabdrabulridha Z, AlAbbas J et al. Permanent First Mandibular Molar: Loss Prevalence and Pattern among Saudis in Al-Ahsa. Eur J Dent 2023;17(03):840–4.
15. Mirbeigi S, Kazemipoor M, Khojastepour L. Evaluation of the Course of the Inferior Alveolar Canal: The First CBCT Study in an Iranian Population. Pol J Radiol 2016;81:338–41.
16. Jesudas PC, Seelam M, Santhosh Kumar MP. Assessment of Relation and Course of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Using CBCT-A Retrospective Study of 120 Cases. Int J Dent Oral Sci 2021;4320–5.
17. Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V et al. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(3):200.
18. Lvovsky A, Bachrach S, Kim HC et al. Relationship between Root Apices and the Mandibular Canal: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Comparison of 3 Populations. J Endod 2018;44(4):555–8.
19. Tabinda H. Characteristics Of The Mental Foramen In Different Populations. Internet J Biol Anthropol 2011;4(2):1–7.
20. Vieira CL, Veloso SAR, Lopes FF. Location of the course of the mandibular canal, anterior loop and accessory mental foramen through cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2018;40(12):1411–7.
21. Čanković D, Čanković M, Ukropina S et al. Association of health determinants and depressive symptoms with tooth loss in the Serbian adult population: A cross-sectional study. Vojnosanit Pregl 2019;76(10):985–97.
Objavljeno
2025/11/19
Rubrika
Originalni rad / Original article