PROCENA SOCIJALNOG OPTEREĆENJA BOLESNIKA SA PRIMARNIM GLAUKOMOM OTVORENOG UGLA

  • Zoran Velkovski Klinicka bolnica Bitola
  • Маја Belevska Clinical Hospital Bitola, Department of Ophthalmology
  • Emilija Gjosevska Dastevska Faculty of medicine Skopje, Clinic for eye diseases
Ključne reči: примарни глауком отвореног угла, социјални терет, социодемографски параметри, терапија

Sažetak


Glaukom je hronična oftalmološka bolest koju karakteriše progresivan, nepovratan gubitak vidne oštrine, dugotrajna progresija i doživotno lečenje, opadanje radne sposobnosti i samodovoljnosti, što može da generiše socijalno opterećenje kod bolesnika. Studija je dizajnirana tako da obuhvati socijalne, kliničke i farmakološke aspekte procene društvenog opterećenja bolesnika primarnim glaukomom otvorenog ugla. Reč je o studiji preseka sa kvantitativnim analitičkim pristupom, koja obuhvata 182 bolesnika muškog i ženskog pola, sa primarnim glaukomom otvorenog ugla, starosti od 20 do 67 godina, sa očuvanom oštrinom vida > 6/18 (0,33), prema ICD-10 klasifikaciji, sprovedena u periodu od avgusta do novembra 2020. godine na teritoriji Severne Makedonije. 53,3% ispitanika činile su žene i 46,7% činili su muškarci, od kojih je 79,12% lečeno propisanim lekovima, 8,8% laserom i 12,08% podvrgnuto je hirurškom zahvatu. Redovno se lečilo 57,69% ispitanika, 43,96% imalo je negativan ishod, delimičan uspeh u 30,22%, a kod 25,82% ispitanika lečenje je sprečilo dalji gubitak vida. 14,28% ispitanika iskusilo je socijalno i porodično opterećenje, a 34,07% nelagodnost, depresiju, anksioznost, beznađe i druge psihosocijalne poremećaje. Primarni glaukom otvorenog ugla stvara značajan socio-ekonomski teret, kao rezultat nepovratnog oštećenja vida, smanjene radne sposobnosti i produktivnosti i visokih troškova lečenja bolesnika. Stepen socijalnog opterećenja zavisi od razvoja i kliničkog stadijuma bolesti, procenta očuvanog vida, dostupnosti, načina i redovnosti lečenja i socio-demografskih parametara, kao što su pol, starost, zanimanje, genetska predispozicija, komorbidna stanja, porodična anamneza i dr., koji kod glaukoma igraju ulogu predisponirajućih faktora rizika.

Reference

Babić N. Medikamentozna terapija glaukoma. Novi Sad: Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu 2013;5-6.

Bagnis A, Papadia M, Scotto R, Traverso CE. Current and emerging medical therapies in treatment of glau-coma. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2011;16(2):293-307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Baudouin C, Renard JP, Nordmann JP, Denis P, Lachkar Y, Sellem E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for ocular surface disease among patients treated over the long term for glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;0. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Belevska M, Jovanovic J, Gjosevska-Dastevska E, Velkovski Z. The importance of individual predictors and psychosocial working conditions in assessing the work ability index of people with low vision. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;27(2):442-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Brown RL, Barrett AE. Visual impairment and quality of life among older adults: an examination of ex-planations for the relationship. The Journals of Ge-rontologySeries B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2011;66(3):364-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Burr J, Azuara-Blanco A, Avenell A, Tuulonen A. Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9): CD004399. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I. Definition of glaucoma: clinical and ex-perimental concepts. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40(4):341-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Castro AN, Mesquita WA. Noncompliance with drug therapy for glaucoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008; 71(2):207-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Chong EW, Lamoureux EL, Jenkins MA, Aung T, Saw SM, Wong TY. Sociodemographic, lifestyle and medical risk factors for visual impairment in an urban asian population: the singapore malay eye study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1640-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cook C, Foster P. Epidemiology of glaucoma: what’s new? Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47(3):223-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Eldaly M, Hunter M, Khafagy M. The socioeconomic impact among Egyptian glaucoma patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(10):1274-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

European Glaucoma Society. European Glaucoma Society Guidelines (2014). Terminology and Guide-lines for Glaucoma. 4th edn. Savona, Italy: Editrice DOGMA;2014;79-89.

Feiner L, Piltz-Seymour JR. Collaborative initial glau-coma treatment study: a summary of results to date. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14(2):106-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Fiscella RG, Lee J, Davis EJH, Walt J. Cost of illness of glaucoma: a critical and systematic review. Pharmaco-economics. 2009; 27(3):189-98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Floriani I, Quaranta L, Rulli E, Katsanos A, Varano L, Frezzotti P, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. An Italian multicentre observational study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(5):e278-e286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Friedman DS, Wolfs RCW, O`Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, et al.  Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):532-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Geimer SA. Glaucoma diagnostics. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91 Thesis 1:1-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Grekova D, Andreevska K, Petrova G, Petkova V. Assessment of the social and economic burden of glaucoma in Bulgaria. Biomedical Research. 2018; 29(12):2578-81. [CrossRef]

Kara N, Altan C, Yuksel K, Tetikoglu M. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculo-plasty in cases with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013;29(9):500-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kim HY, Egbert PR, Singh K. Long-term comparison of primary trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil versus mitomycin C in West Africa. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(7): 578-83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kocur I., Resnicoff S., Visual impairments and blind-ness in Europe and their prevention. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:716-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Koucheki B, Hashemi H. Selective laser trabeculo-plasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(1):65-70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lau JTF, Lee V, Fan D, Lau M, Michon J. Knowledge about cataract, glaucoma, and age related macular degeneration in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(10):1080-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Leite MT, Sakata LM, Medeiros FA. Managing glau-coma in developing countries. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(2):83-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Leung EW, Medeiros F, Weinreb RN. Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(5):350-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mansberger SL, Sheppler CR, McClure TM, Vanalstine CL, Swanson IL, Stoumbos Z, et al. Psychometrics of a new questionnaire to assess glaucoma adherence: the Glaucoma Treatment Compliance Assessment Tool (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013;111:1-16.

Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, et al. Global vision impairment and blindness due to uncorrected refractive error, 1999-2010. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:227-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Nayak B, Gupta S, Kumar G, Dada T, Gupta V, Sihota R. Socioeconomics of long-term glaucoma therapy in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63(1):20-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Odberg T, Jakobsen JE, Hultgren SJ, Halseide R. The impact of glaucoma on the quality of life of patients in Norway. Results from a self-administered question-naire. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79(2):116-20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Orme M, Collins S, Loftus J. Long-term medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in the UK: Optimizing cost-effectiveness and clinic resources by minimizing therapy switches. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(7) 433-49. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Peters D, Heijl A, Brenner L, Bengtsson B. Visual impairment and vision-related quality of life in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial after 20 years of follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(8):745-52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Pisella PJ, Pouliquen P, Baudouin C. Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and pre-servative free glaucoma medication. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(4):418-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Pizzarello L, Abiose A, Ffytche T, Duerksen R, Thulasiraj R, Taylor H, et al. VISION 2020: The right to sight: a global initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):615-20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Poulsen PB, Buchholz P, Walt JG, Christensen TL, Thygensen J. Cost analysis of glaucoma-related-blindness in Europe. International Congress Series. 2005;1282:262-6. [CrossRef]

Prum BE, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Moroi SE, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern((R)) Guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41-P111. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Quaranta L, Riva I, Gerardi C, Oddone F, Floriani I, Konstas AGP. Quality of life in glaucoma: a review of the literature. Adv Ther. 2016;33(6):959-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011;377(9774): 1367-77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rachmiel R, Trope GE, Chipman ML, Gouws P, Buys YM. Effect of medical therapy on glaucoma filtration surgery rates in Ontario. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(10):1472-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, et al. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(12):1754-60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4254-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Samples JR, Singh K, Lin SC, Francis BA, Hodapp E, Jampel HD, et al. Laser trabeculoplasty for open angle glaucoma: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(11):2296-302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Sarenac-Vulovic T, Janicijevic K. Primary open-angle glaucoma and pharmacoeconomics: Review. Sana-med. 2016;11(3):243-8. [CrossRef]

Servat JJ, Bernardino CR. Effects of common topical antiglaucoma medications on the ocular surface, eyelids and periorbital tissue. Drugs Aging. 2011; 28(4):267-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Shih V, Parekh M, Multani JK, McGuiness CB, Chen CC, Campbell JH, et al. Clinical and economic burden of glaucoma by disease severity: a United States claims–based analysis. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021; 4(5):490-503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley H, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11): 2081-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Uusitalo H, Chen E, Pfeiffer N, Brignole-Baudouin F, Kaarniranta K, Leino M, et al. Switching from a preserved to a preservative-free prostaglandin pre-paration in topical glaucoma medication. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(3):329-36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H, Tuulonen A, Aronen P, Sintonen H, Suoranta L, Kovanen N, et al. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of an organized screening programme for glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):508-18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Vasudevan SK, Gupta V, Crowston JG. Neuro-protection in glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011; 59 Suppl(Suppl1):S102-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Wang W, He M, Li Z, Huang W. Epidemiological variations and trends in health burden of glaucoma worldwide. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(3):e349-e355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The patho-physiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Objavljeno
2022/01/31
Rubrika
Originalni rad