ODGOVOR POTKOŽNOG TKIVA NA DVE IMPLANTIRANE MEMBRANE NA BAZI KOLAGENA RAZLIČITOG POREKLA

  • Milena Radenković Stošić Univerzitet u Nišu, Naučnoistraživački centar za biomedicinu, Odeljenje za ćelijsko i tkivno inžinjerstvo, Niš, R. Srbija
  • Sanja Stojanović Univerzitet u Nišu, Medicinski fakultet, UNO Biologija sa humanom genetikom; Naučnoistraživački centar za biomedicinu, Odeljenje za ćelijsko i tkivno inžinjerstvo, Niš, R. Srbija
  • Milica Tomić Univerzitet u Nišu, Naučnoistraživački centar za biomedicinu, Odeljenje za ćelijsko i tkivno inžinjerstvo, Niš, R. Srbija
  • Jelena Živković Univerzitet u Nišu, Medicinski fakultet, UNO Biologija sa humanom genetikom, Niš, R. Srbija
  • Vladan Mirjanić Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Medicinski fakultet, Studijski program Dentalna Medicina, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, Bosna i Hercegovina
  • Predrag Kovačević Univerzitet u Nišu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra Hirurgija; Univerzitetski Klinički Centar Niš, Klinika za plastičnu i rekonstruktivnu hirurgiju, Niš, R. Srbija
  • Stevo Najman Univerzitet u Nišu, Medicinski fakultet, UNO Biologija sa humanom genetikom; Naučnoistraživački centar za biomedicinu, Odeljenje za ćelijsko i tkivno inžinjerstvo, Niš, R. Srbija
Ključne reči: kolagenske membrane, odgovor tkiva, in vivo, potkožna implantacija

Sažetak


Kao glavni strukturni protein kod sisara, kolagen ispunjava osnovne zahteve da bude odgovarajuća komponenta biomaterijala koji se koriste u tkivnom inženjerstvu. Zbog svoje biokompatibilnosti i biorazgradivosti, kolagen se može koristiti u različitim oblicima u vođenoj regeneraciji mekog i koštanog tkiva. Membrane zasnovane na kolagenu, koje se često koriste za regeneraciju mekih i tvrdih tkiva, mogu se razlikovati po svom poreklu (svinjske, goveđe i konjske), fizičko-hemijskim karakteristikama kao što su arhitektura, poroznost, sposobnost apsorpcije, kao i po proizvodnim procesima, koji mogu uticati na odgovor tkiva i konačni ishod. U ovom istraživanju  ispitali smo i uporedili odgovor tkiva na dve implantirane kolagenske membrane različitog porekla: svinjskog i konjskog. Koristili smo model potkožne implantacije kod BALB/c miševa, a odgovor tkiva je analiziran tri, deset i trideset dana posle implantacije. Tkivo je analizirano histološkim i histomorfometrijskim metodama. Dobijeni rezultati su pokazali da postoje varijacije u odgovoru potkožnog tkiva, obrascima ćelijske infiltracije, kao i da postoje promene u debljini membrane i brzini resorpcije; to se može pripisati razlikama u poreklu membrane, ali i razlikama u procesu proizvodnje. Možemo zaključiti da su obe membrane pogodne za primenu u vođenoj regeneraciji tkiva. 

Reference

Abou Fadel R, Samarani R, Chakar C. Guided bone regeneration in calvarial critical size bony defect using a double-layer resorbable collagen membrane covering a xenograft: a histological and histomorphometric study in rats. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 22(2): 203–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Barbeck M, Lorenz J, Holthaus MG, Raetscho N, Kubesch A, Booms P, et al. Porcine Dermis and Pericardium-Based, Non–Cross-Linked Materials Induce Multinucleated Giant Cells After Their In Vivo Implantation: A Physiological Reaction? J Oral Implantol 2015; 41(6): e267–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Barbeck M, Lorenz J, Kubesch A, Böhm N, Booms P, Choukroun J, et al. Porcine Dermis-Derived Collagen Membranes Induce Implantation Bed Vascularization Via Multinucleated Giant Cells: A Physiological Reaction? J Oral Implantol 2015; 41(6): e238–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Behring J, Junker R, Walboomers XF, Chessnut B, Jansen JA. Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review. Odontology 2008; 96(1): 1-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bottino MC, Thomas V, Schmidt G, Vohra YK, Chu TM, Kowolik MJ, et al. Recent advances in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration—A materials perspective. Dental Mater 2012; 28(7): 703–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bozkurt A, Apel C, Sellhaus B, et al. Differences in degradation behavior of two non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes: an in vitro and in vivo study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2014; 25(12): 1403-1411. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Brunel G, Piantoni P, Elharar F, Benqué E, Marin P, Zahedi S. Regeneration of Rat Calvarial Defects Using a Bioabsorbable Membrane Technique: Influence of Collagen Cross-linking. J Periodontol 1996; 67(12): 1342-1348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bunyaratavej P, Wang H-L. Collagen Membranes: A Review. Journal of Periodontol 2001; 72(2): 215-229. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Calciolari E, Ravanetti F, Strange A, Mardas N, Bozec L, Cacchioli A, et al. Degradation pattern of a porcine collagen membrane in an in vivo model of guided bone regeneration. J Periodontal Res. 2018; 53(3): 430-439. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Chevallay B, Herbage D. Collagen-based biomaterials as 3D scaffold for cell cultures: applications for tissue engineering and gene therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000; 38(2):211-218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia 2012; 8(9):3191–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Fidler AL, Boudko SP, Rokas A, Hudson BG. The triple helix of collagens – an ancient protein structure that enabled animal multicellularity and tissue evolution. J Cell Sci 2018; 131(7):jcs203950. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Flaig I, Radenković M, Najman S, Pröhl A, Jung O, Barbeck M. In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Immune Response of Jellyfish Collagen Scaffolds and its Suitability for Bone Regeneration. IJMS 2020; 21(12): 4518. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Gauza-Włodarczyk M, Kubisz L, Włodarczyk D. Amino acid composition in determination of collagen origin and assessment ophysical factors effects.International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2017; 104: 987–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ghanaati S. Non-cross-linked porcine-based collagen I–III membranes do not require high vascularization rates for their integration within the implantation bed: A paradigm shift. Acta Biomater 2012; 8(8): 3061–72 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Gueldenpfennig T, Houshmand A, Najman S, Stojanovic S, Korzinskas T, Smeets R, et al. The Condensation of Collagen Leads to an Extended Standing Time and a Decreased Pro-inflammatory Tissue Response to a Newly Developed Pericardium-based Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. In Vivo 2020; 34(3): 985-1000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Herrera-Vizcaíno C, Al-Maawi S, Sader R, Kirkpatrick CJ, Choukroun J, Ghanaati S. Modification of collagen-based sponges can induce an upshift of the early inflammatory response and a chronic inflammatory reaction led by M1 macrophages: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Invest 2020; 24(10): 3485–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Thomaidis V, et al. Application of PRP gel alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration does not enhance bone healing process: An experimental study in rabbits. J of Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2011; 39(1): 49-53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Khan R, Khan M. Use of collagen as a biomaterial: An update. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013; 17(4): 539. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Khorramirouz R, Go JL, Noble C, Jana S, Maxson E, Lerman A, et al. A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold. Acta Histochem 2018; 120(3): 282-291. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Korzinskas T, Jung O, Smeets R, Stojanovic S, Najman S, Glenske K, et al. In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. IJMS 2018; 19(10):2952. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kumar V, Cotran RS, Robbins SL. Osnove patologije, II. izdanje, Školska knjiga, Zagreb, 2000. (Serbian)

Lin K, Zhang D, Macedo MH, Cui W, Sarmento B, Shen G. Advanced Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Biomedicine. Adv Funct Mater 2019; 29(3): 1804943. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Meyer M. Processing of collagen based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties. BioMed Eng OnLine 2019; 18(1): 24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Moses O, Vitrial D, Aboodi G, Sculean A, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, et al. Biodegradation of Three Different Collagen Membranes in the Rat Calvarium: A Comparative Study. J Periodontol 2008; 79(5): 905-911. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen Membrane Resorption in Dogs: A Comparative Study. Implant Dent 2001; 10(1): 49-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Parvini P, Mihatovic I, Sahin D, Becker J, Schwarz F. Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using an equine-derived collagen-containing bone block: A prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022; 33(2): 142– 149. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16(3): 369-378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Wagner-Ecker M, Voltz P, Egermann M, Richter W. The collagen component of biological bone graft substitutes promotes ectopic bone formation by human mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomaterialia 2013; 9(7): 7298-7307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Willershausen I, Barbeck M, Boehm N, et al. Non-cross-linked collagen type I/III materials enhance cell proliferation: in vitro and in vivo evidence. J Appl Oral Sci 2014; 22(1): 29–37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Objavljeno
2024/10/31
Rubrika
Originalni rad