Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models Based on a Small Format Action Camera in a North-East Hungarian Sample Area

  • Norbert Barkóczi Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., 4032 Debrecen
  • Gergely Szabó Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., 4032 Debrecen

Abstract


The use of the small format digital action cameras has been increased in the past few years in various applications, due to their low budget cost, flexibility and reliability. We can mount these small cameras on several devices, like unmanned air vehicles (UAV) and create 3D models with photogrammetric technique. Either creating or receiving these kind of databases, one of the most important questions will always be that how accurate these systems are, what the accuracy that can be achieved is. We gathered the overlapping images, created point clouds, and then we generated 21 different digital surface models (DSM). The differences based on the number of images we used in each model, and on the flight height. We repeated the flights three times, to compare the same models with each other. Besides, we measured 129 reference points with RTK-GPS, to compare the height differences with the extracted cell values from each DSM. The results showed that higher flight height has lower errors, and the optimal air base distance is one fourth of the flying height in both cases. The lowest median was 0.08 meter, at the 180 meter flight, 50 meter air base distance model. Raising the number of images does not increase the overall accuracy. The connection between the amount of error and distance from the nearest GCP is not linear in every case.

References

Ahmad, A. 2011. Digital Mapping Using Low Altitude UAV. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology 19, 51-58.

Bachmann, F., Herbst, R., Gebbers, R., Hafner, V. V. 2013. Micro UAV Based Georeferenced Orthophoto Generation in VIS+NIR for Precision Agriculture. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40, 11-16.

Barry, P., Coakley, R. 2013. Field Accuracy Test of RPAS Photogrammetry. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40, 27-31.

Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476, 307-310.

Burai, P., Deák, B., Valkó, O., Tomor, T. 2015. Classification of Herbaceous Vegetation Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery. Remote Sensing 7, 2046-2066.

Colomina, I., Molina, P. 2014. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 92, 79-97.

Darwin, N., Ahmad, A., Zainon, O. 2014. The Potential of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Large Scale Mapping of Coastal Area. Earth and Environmental Science 18, 1-6.

d'Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Marzolff, I., Peter, K.D., Ries, J. B. 2012. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing 4, 3390-3416.

Draeyer, B., Strecha, C. 2014. Pix4D White paper How accurate are UAV surveying methods? Internet: https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/202557229-Scientific-White-Paper-How-accurate-are-UAV-surveying-methods-#gsc.tab=0 (16.02.2017).

Farah, A., Talaat, A., Farrag, F. A. 2008. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models using GPS. Artificial Satellites 43, 1-11.

Haala, N., Hastedt, H., Wolf, K., Ressl, C., Baltrusch, S. 2010. Digital Photogrammetric Camera Evaluation - Generation of Digital. Photogrammetrie - Fernerkundung - Geoinformation 2010, 99-115.

Harwin, S., Lucieer, A. 2012. Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery. Remote Sensing 4, 1573-1599.

Karabork, H., Yildiz, F., Coskun, F., Yilmaz, H.M., Yakar, M. 2004. Investigation of Accuracy for Digital Elevation Models Generated with Different Methods in Photogrammetry. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 35, B3.

Karátson, D., Telbisz, T., Wörner, G. 2012. Erosion rates and erosion patterns of Neogene to Quaternary stratovolcanoes in the Western Cordillera of the Central Andes: An SRTM DEM based analysis. Geomorphology 2012, 122-135.

Kraus, K. 1998. Fotogrammetria. 380 S., Tertia Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. (in Hugarian)

Kruskal, W. H., Wallis, W. A. 1952. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47, 583-621.

Küng, O., Strecha, C., Beyeler, A., Zufferey, J-C., Floreano, D., Fua, P., Gervaix, F. 2011. The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-Light UAV Imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38, 125-130.

Laliberte, A. S., Winters, C. 2008. A Procedure for Orthorectification of Sub-Decimeter Resolution Imagery Obtained With an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference 2008, 1-9.

Lucieera, A., Turnera, D., Kingb, D.H., Robinson, S. A. 2014. Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to capturemicro-topography of Antarctic moss beds. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2014, 53-62.

Niethammer, U., James, M.R., Rothmund, S., Travelletti, J., Joswig, M. 2011. UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: Evaluation and results. Engineering Geology 2012, 2-11.

Rayburg, S., Thoms, M. C., Neave, M. 2009. A comparison of digital elevation models generated from different data sources. Geomorphology 2009, 261-270.

Rock, G., Ries, J. B., Udelhoven, T. 2011. Sensitivity analysis of UAV-Photogrammetry for creating digital elevation models (DEM). International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38, 69-73.

Rosu, A.-M., Assenbaum, M., De la Torre, Y., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M. 2015. Coastal digital surface model on low contrast images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40, 1-6.

Ruiz, J. J., Diaz-Mas, L., Perez, F., Viguria, A. 2013. Evaluating the Accuracy of DEM Generation Algorithms from UAV Imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40, 333-337.

Stöcker, C., Eltner, A., Karrasch, P. 2015. Measuring gullies by synergetic application of UAV and close range photogrammetry — A case study from Andalusia, Spain. CATENA 2015, 1-11.

Subcommittee for Base Cartographic Data Federal Geographic Data Committee: Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards. Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy, NSDI. 1996. Virginia, USA. Internet: https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/accuracy/part3/chapter3 (16.02.2017).

Tahar, K. N., Ahmad, A. 2011. Capability of Low Cost Digital Camera for Production of Orthophoto and Volume Determination. International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications IEEE 2011, 67-71.

Tahar, K. 2015. Height accuracy based on different RTK GPS method for Ultra-Light Aircraft Images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 43, 1-6.

Telbisz, T., Mari, L., Szabó, L. 2011. Geomorphological Characteristics of the Italian side of Canin Massif (Julian Alps) Using Digital Terrain Analysis and Field Observations. Acta Carsologica 40, 255-266.

Trimble, 2013. Business Center Photogrammetry Module. Westminster, Colorado, USA: Trimble Geospatial Division. Internet: http://uas.trimble.com/sites/default/files/downloads/trimble_business_center_photogrammetry_module_white_paper_-_english_final-corrected.pdf (16.02.2017).

Turner, D., Lucieer, A., Watson, C. 2012. An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds. Remote Sensing 2012, 1392-1410.

Van Leeuwen, B., Tobak, Z., Szatmári, J., Musci, L., Kitka, G., Fiala, K., Rakonczai, J., Mezősi, G. Car, A., Griesebner, G. & Strobl, J. (eds.) 2009. Small Format Aerial Photography a Cost Effective Approach for Visible, Near Infrared and Thermal Digital Imaging.: Geospatial Crossroads @ GI_Forum. 200-209, Heidelberg: Proceedings of the Geoinformatics Forum, Salzburg, Austria.

Weng, Q., Richardson, D. E., Oosterom, P. (eds.) 2002. Quantifying Uncertainty of Digital Elevation Models Derived from Topographic Maps. Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin. 403-418.

Zhang, Y., Xiong, J., Hao, L. 2011. Photogrammetric Processing of Low-Altitude Images Acquired by Unpiloted Aerial Vehicles. The Photogrammetric Record 26, 190-211.

Published
2017/12/19
Section
Original Research