Human-nature relationship and public perception of environmental hazards along the Maros/Mureş River (Hungary and Romania)
Abstract
Public participation is increasingly important in flood and environmental management planning. Accordingly, understanding the attitude of local society to natural values and their relations with the environment is highly important to realize successful development projects. This study aimed to analyze the human-nature relationship, the public perceptions of environmental hazards and people's engagement with water management related and human interventions at Maros/Mureş River through a public survey. The survey was carried out in 11 Romanian and Hungarian settlements using the random walking method to interview the local public. The results show that people are a little pessimistic concerning the state of the river, and there are misbeliefs about the general problems affecting its present environmental status. Meanwhile, the perception of flood hazard is governed by the fading memory of the last high-risk flood event in 1970. The engagement of residents is mostly affected by socio-demographic parameters. However, the regularity they visit the river is also very important. Consequently, informing people on apparent environmental issues and processes can greatly help the socially inclusive implementation of water management measures along the river.
References
Amissah, G.J., Kiss, T., & Fiala, K. (2018). Morphological Evolution of the Lower Tisza River (Hungary) in the 20th Century in Response to Human Interventions. Water, 10(7), 884 doi:10.3390/w10070884
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont
Boga, L., & Novaky, B. (eds.) (1986). Magyarorszag vizeinek mőszaki-hidrologiai jellemzese. A felszini vizkeszlet mutatoi: Maros. Budapest: Vizgazdalkodasi Intezet
Bryman, A. (2001). Methods of Sociological Research. Oxford University Press. p. 540.
Burningham, K., Fielding, J., & Thrush, D. (2008). ‘It'll never happen to me’: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters, 32(2), 216-238.
Cockerill, K. (2016). Environmental reviews and case studies: public perception of a high-quality river: mixed messages. Environmental Practice, 18(1), 44-52. doi: 10.1017/S14660466150 0 040X
Comănescu, L., & Nedelea, A. (2016). Floods and public perception on their effect. Case Study: Tecuci Plain (Romania), year 2013. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32, 190-199.
David, E.L. (1971). Public perception of water quality. Water Resources, 7, 453–457.
Entwistle, N.S., Heritage, G.L., Schofield, L.A., & Williamson, R.J. (2019). Recent changes to floodplain character and functionality in England. Recent changes to floodplain character and functionality in England. Catena, 174, 490-498. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.018
EU WFD (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy
Firebaugh, G. (2008). Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton University Press, p.272.
Flotemersch, J., & Aho, K. (2021). Factors influencing perceptions of aquatic ecosystems. Ambio, 50, 425–435. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01358-0
Gomez-Cunya, L. A., Tilt, J., Tullos, D., & Babbar-Sebens, M. (2022). Perceived risk and preferences of response and recovery actions of individuals living in a floodplain community. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 102645.
De Groot, M. (2012). Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 1-9.
Hale, R. L., Cook, E. M., & Beltrán, B. J. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105580.
Hophmayer Tokich, S. (2005). Public participation under the EU water framework directive - processes and possible outcomes. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/17709578/public_participation.pdf>
House, M. (1990). Public perception and water quality management. Water Science and Technology, 34, 25–32. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00850-5.
Howarth, W. (2009). Aspirations and realities under the water framework directive: proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(3) 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqp019>
Ioana-Toroimac, G., Zaharia, L., Neculau, G., Constantin, D. M., & Stan, F. I. (2020). Translating a river's ecological quality in ecosystem services: An example of public perception in Romania. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 20(1), 31-37.
Jähnig, S. C., Carolli, M., Dehnhardt, A., Jardine, T., Podschun, S., Pusch, M. Scholcz, M., Tharme, R.E, Wantzen, K.M., & Langhans, S. (2022). Ecosystem Services of River Systems–Irreplaceable, Undervalued, and at Risk. In: Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, 2nd edition. Tockner, K. & Mehner, T. (eds.). Elsevier.
Khew, J.Y.T., Yokohari, M, & Tanaka, T. (2014). Public perceptions of nature and landscape preference in Singapore. Human Ecology, 42, 979–988. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-014-9709-x
Kiss, T., & Blanka, V. (2012). River channel response to climate- and human-induced hydrological changes: Case study on the meandering Hernád River, Hungary. Geomorphology, 175-176, 115-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.07.003
Kiss, T., Fiala, K., Sipos, Gy., & Szatmári G. (2019). Long-term hydrological changes after various river regulation measures: are we responsible for flow extremes? Hydrology Research, 50(2), 417-430. DOI: 10.2166/nh.2019.095
Konecsny K., & Balint G. (2009). Low water related hydrological hazards along the lower Mureş/Maros river. Riscuri şi catastrofe, 872022071584-5273
KSH (2018). Magyarország közigazgatási helynévkönyve, 2018. január 1., Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, pp. 48.
Laczay, I. (1975). A Maros vizgyűjtője es vizrendszere. In Vizrajzi Atlasz Sorozat 19 Maros. Budapest: VITUKI; 4–7.
Letenyei, L. (2004). Telepuleskutatas. A telepulesi es tersegi tervezes tarsadalomtudomanyos alapozasa. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiado, 147–185.
Letenyei, L., & Racz A. (2011). Mintavetel terepmunka kozben. In: Roma kutatasok, 2010. Elethelyzetek a tarsadalom peremen. Kurucz, E. (ed). Budapest: Nemzeti Csalades Szocialpolitikai Intezet, pp.45–75.
Marshall, B.K. (2004). Gender, race, and perceived environmental risk: The "white male" effect in Cancer Alley, LA. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 453–478. doi: 10.1080/02732170490459485.
Mujere, N., & Moyce, W. (2017). Climate Change Impacts on Surface Water Quality. In: Ganpat, W., & Isaac, W. (eds.). Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change Adaptation Strategies. IGI Global, 322-340.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, p. 458.
Oroszi V. (2009). Hullámtér-fejlődés vizsgálata a Maros magyarországi szakaszán. PhD Dissertation. Szeged: University of Szeged.
Osti, R.P. (2018). Integrating Flood and Environmental Risk Management: Principles and Practices. ADB East Asia Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank. p. 51. DOI: 10.22617/WPS189607-2
Oyedotun, T.D.T., & Nasrudeen Ally, N. (2021). Environmental issues and challenges confronting surface waters in South America: A review. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100049. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100049
Pagneux, E., Gísladóttir, G., & Jónsdóttir, S. (2011). Public perception of flood hazard and flood risk in Iceland: a case study in a watershed prone to ice-jam floods. Natural hazards, 58(1), 269-287.
RPL (2011). Populaţia stabilă pe judeţe, municipii, oraşe şi localităti componenete la RPL_2011. In: Recensământul Populației Și Locuințelor 2011, Romania. (in Romanian). Available at: https://www.recensamantromania.ro/rpl-2011/rezultate-2011/>
Saha, D., Das, D., Dasgupta, R., & Patel, P. P. (2020). Application of ecological and aesthetic parameters for riparian quality assessment of a small tropical river in eastern India. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106627.
Schaich, H. (2009). Local residents' perceptions of floodplain restoration measures in Luxembourg's Syr Valley. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(1), 20-30.
Seymour, V. (2016). The human–nature relationship and its impact on health: A critical review. Frontiers in public health, 260. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00260
D'Souza, M., Johnson, M. F., & Ives, C. D. (2021). Values influence public perceptions of flood management schemes. Journal of Environmental Management, 291, 112636.
Suren, A.M. (2009). Using Macrophytes in Urban Stream Rehabilitation: A Cautionary Tale. Restoration Ecology, 17(6), 873–883.
Tockner, K., & Stanford, J. A. (2002). Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental conservation, 29(3), 308-330.
Wang, P., Chen, B., Yuan, R., Li, C., & Li, Y. (2016). Characteristics of aquatic bacterial community and the influencing factors in an urban river. Science of the Total Environment, 569-570, 382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.130 .
White, P.C.L., Vaughan Jennings, N., Renwick,A. R., & Barker, N. H. L. (2005). Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(3), 421-430. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01032.x
