WHICH MODEL OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS THE BEST FOR SERBIA

  • Jugoslav Aničić “Union-Nikola Tesla University”, Faculty of Entrepreneurial Business, Belgrade
  • Dušan Aničić University Union -Nikola Tesla, Faculty of Economics and Finance, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract


The neoliberal model of economic development implemented by the most developed countries of the West in the recent years has caused great financial world crisis; it also led to a slow-down in the world economic growth as well as huge social inequality in the world. On the other hand, certain countries, with China as a distinct representative, have been developing their economies independently, according to the tradition and their own experience, where the government institutions, in addition to the market, have an important role in the issues of economic development. Transition countries, Serbia among them, have mainly accepted the neoliberal model of development, with an even greater lag behind the world most developed countries as a result. This paper indicates the need for the implementation of individual models of economic development, based on the specific development potentials and adjusted to the countries‘ conditions. It is better to introduce social and economic reforms gradually, in order to achieve rapid and sustainable economic development, according to the appropriate opportunities, rather than follow the trends blindly and implement reforms at any cost.

References

Antevski, M., Filipović, S., (2014) Inostrane investicione aktivnosti kineskih kompanija, Medjunarodni problem 66 (3-4), p 231-248.

Arsić, M., (2016) Dugoročne posledice ekonomskog sloma privrede Srbije tokom 90-tih godina, Kvartalni monitor, br. 44, Beograd

Aničić, J., Aničić, D., Kvrgić, G., (2019) Sustainable growth and regional competitiveness of Serbian economy, Ekonomika, Vol.65, No 2, p 65-74, ISSN 0350-137X, EISSN 2334-9190, UDK 338 (497.1)

Colin, C. T., (1992), Creating the Global Company: Successful Internationalization, McGraw-Hill, New York

Danielle, M, W., Thomas, W., Joerg, S., (2006) Doing Business Internationally; The Guide to Cross-Cultural Success, McGraw-Hill, New York

Filipović, S., Petrović, P., (2015) Pozicioniranje privrede u globalnom ekonomskom okruženju, Ekonomski institut, Beograd, p 122-123

Dimant, E., Krieger, T., Meierrieks, D., (2013) The effect of coruption on migration 1985-2000. Applied Economics Letters, 20(13), 1270-1274, doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.806776

EBRD, (2010), Transition report, Recovery and Reform

Janković, A., (2017) Chinas economic development : connectivity, Shinese Way, Silk Road Connectivity Research Center, Belgrade, p 40-41.

Jakopin, E., (2018), Privredni rast i institucionalna tranzicija Republike Srbije, Ekonomski horizonti, Maj-Avgust 2018, Volumen 20, Sveska 2, str. 95-108,

Lissowska, M., (2014) Welfare against Growth Gains in Post-Transition Countries. What are the Conseguences for Stability? http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economic-ejournal.ja.2014-13

Narodna banka Srbije, (2019) Osnovni makroekonomski pokazatelji, Beograd

Pejanović, R., (2017) Razvojni problemi privrede i društva, Akademska knjiga, Novi Sad, str. 118

Piketi, T., (2015) Kapital u 21. veku, Akademska knjiga, Novi Sad

Sacsh, J., (1994) Shock Therapy in Poland: Perspectives of Five Years, Tanner lectures, University of Utah

Stiglitc, J., E., (2004) The Post-Washington Consensus, The Initiative for Policy Dialogue

Stiglitc, J., E., (2014) Slobodan pad, Akademska knjiga, Novi Sad

WEF., (2018). Global Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum

www.:ec. europa.eu/eurostat, pristup sajtu 15.07.2019. godine

Published
2019/10/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper