REGIONAL FEATURES OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT AND DIFFERENTIATION OF DIRECTIONS OF INNOVATION POLICY OF RUSSIA

Keywords: economic growth, innovation, innovation climate, public policy

Abstract


In our manuscript we have made an attempt to study specific sides of Russian Federation’s innovative development, analyze its impact in economy growth and provide main ways of innovative policy realization in different types of regions. The method is based on partial abstraction from the unique properties of each region, thereby uniting them into homogeneous groups using k-means method. Further analysis of the determination of the main factor at the level of country was carried out using decision trees functions with the subsequent collection of OOB errors. Group analysis was carried out using regression analysis. As a result, the authors obtained five types of regions (with a high, above average, average, below average, low level of innovative development), provided an individual characteristic for each group regarding the innovation development and identified prerogative innovative factors that can be considered by the state as a criterion for differentiating state policy and regulation of the development of innovation policy.

Author Biographies

Alexander Dubovitski, Michurinsk state agrarian University

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Commerce

Elvira Klimentova, Michurinsk State Agrarian University

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Commerce

Matvei Rogov, Michurinsk State Agrarian University

Student Department of Economics and Commerce

References

Abdrakhmanova, G., Artemov, S., Bakhtin P. et al. (2020). Russian Regional Innovation Scoreboard, Issue 6. Edited by L. Gokhberg (ed.). National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow: HSE. https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/315338500 (26.09.2021).

Acs, ZJ, Audretsch, DB & Lehmann, EE (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757-774.

Aničić. D., Nestorović, O. & Andjelković, D. (2021). Investment environment and development policy of enterprises in Serbia. Journal of process management and new technologies, 9(1), 1-7.  https://doi.org/10.5937/jouproman9-30925.

Astanakulov, O. T., Kuchkovskaya, N. V., Bataeva, P. S., Khokhlova, N. I., & Calesci, M. (2019). Providing Innovative Processes in the Economic Development of the Russian Regions. Space and Culture, India, 7(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.456.

Averina, L. M. & Sirotin, D. V. (2020). Assessment of Spatial Effects from Innovation Activities in the Industrialized Russian Regions. Economy of region, 16(1), 268-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-20.

Benhabib, J., Perla, J. & Tonetti, C. (2021). Reconciling Models of Diffusion and Innovation: A Theory of the Productivity Distribution and Technology Frontier. Econometrica, 89, 2261-2301. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15020.

Bloom, N., Reenen, Van H. & Williams, J. (2019). Policy of innovation support: a set of tools. Questions of Economics, 10, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-5-31.

Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002.

Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00025-5.

Dementiev, V. E. (2019). Productivity Paradox in Regional Dimension. Economy of Region, 15(1), 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2019-1-4.

Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028.

Dubovitski, A. A. & Klimentova E. A. (2019). Key guidelines for the economic development of small agribusiness. Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises, 12, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2019-0-12-89-94. 

Edquist, C. (2019). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the swedish national innovation council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, 48(4), 869-879.

Ejdemo, T., & Örtqvist, D. (2021). Exploring a leading and lagging regions dichotomy: Does entrepreneurship and diversity explain it? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00146-8.

Foster, L., Grim, C., Haltiwanger, J. C. & Wolf, Z (2018). Innovation, Productivity Dispersion, and Productivity Growth, NBER Working Paper 24420. https://doi.org/10.3386/W24420. 

Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.

Karpunina, E.K. et al. (2020). Dialectics of Sustainable Development of Digital Economy Ecosystem. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 129 LNNS, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_54.

Karpunina, E.K. et al. (2021). State policy of transition to Society 5.0: identification and assessment of digitalisation risks. Int. J. Public Law and Policy, 7(4), 334–350.

Khannanov, K. M. (2015). Promising directions for the development of innovative processes in the regions: problems and tasks. Regional economics: theory and practice, 39(414), 56-68.

Kok, K. P. W., Loeber, A. M. C., & Grin, J. (2021). Politics of complexity: Conceptualizing agency, power and powering in the transitional dynamics of complex adaptive systems. Research Policy, 50(3), 104183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104183.

Kokovikhin, A. Yu., Ogorodnikova, E. S., Williams, D. & Plakhin, A. Ye. (2017). Institutional Factors in the Evaluation by the Entrepreneur of Municipality Investment Climate. Economy of Region, 13(1), 80–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-8.

Link, A. N., Ruhm C. J. & Siegel, D. S. (2014). Private Equity and the Innovation Strategies of Entrepreneurial Firms: Empirical Evidence from the Small Business Innovation Research Program, Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/MDE.2648.

Maryasis, D. (2017). Possibilities of transformation of the system of state support for the development of innovations. The experience of Israel. Economic policy, 12 (5), 80-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-5-05.

Maslennikov, M. I. (2017). The Technological Innovations and their Impact on the Economy. Economy of region, 13(4), 1221-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-20.

Maurizio, B., Dávalos, M. E., Peragine, V. & Sundaram, R. (2018). Toward a New Social Contract: Taking On Distributional Tensions in Europe and Central Asia. Overview booklet. World Bank, Washington. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30393/211353ovRU.pdf?sequence=11 (10.11.2021)

Mohnen, P., Polder, M. & van Leeuwen, G. (2018). ICT, R&D and Organizational Innovation: Exploring Complementarities in Investment and Production, NBER Working Paper 25044. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25044. 

Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289. 

Neganova, V. P. & Dudnik, A. V. (2019). Openness to Innovations of the Regional Agro-Industry as a Subjective Factor of Innovative Activity. Economy of region, 15(3), 880-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-19.

Nikitin, A., Klimentova, E., Dubovitski, A. (2020). Impact of small business innovation activity on regional economic growth in Russia. Revista Inclusiones, 7(SI) 309-321.

OECD (2021a). Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm (10.11.2021).

OECD (2021b). Main Science and Technology Indicators, Volume 2021 Issue 1. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/eea67efc-en.

Pogodaeva, T. V. & Zhaparova, D. V. (2015). The impact of innovations on the socio-economic development of territories: problems of regions of intensive nature management. Regional economy: theory and practice, 7(382), 16-27.

Polezhaeva, A. Yu. (2015). Analysis of conditions for the development of innovations: typology of regions. Regional economy: theory and practice, 45(420), 50-62.

Report "Socio-economic situation of Russia" (2020). Federal State Statistics Service, Moscow. https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/50801.

Tereshchenko, D. S. & Shcherbakov, V. S. (2021). The Impact of Scientific Activity of Universities on Economic and Innovative Development. Economy of Region, 17(1), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-3.

Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.

Wieczorek, A.J. &  Hekkert M.P.  (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Sci. Public Policy, 39, 74-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scr008.

Yang, N., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2020). Does (un)-related variety promote regional innovation in China? industry versus services sector. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 769-788.

Zmiyak, S. S., Ugnich, E. A., & Taranov, P. M. (2020). Development of a regional innovation ecosystem: The role of a pillar university. In book: Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives, 567-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15160-7_47.

Published
2021/12/14
Section
Original Scientific Paper