FIRST YEAR STUDENT ATTITUDES TOWARD DISTANCE LEARNING
Abstract
Over the last two years, since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Serbia worked in the modality of distance learning – instructions and students` assignments were performed by distance, while colloquia and exams were realized in traditional conditions. Regardless of modality, HEIs have to ensure high-quality education in every single course. In this sense, the feedback from students is very important. The purpose of this study is to investigate students` attitudes about four dimensions of distance learning – fulfilment of preconditions, organization and realization of instructions, advantages/disadvantages of distance learning, communication and social interactions. Data was collected from 183 first-year students within three courses at The Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, and was processed in the SPSS software package. The research strategy included descriptive statistics, while the Likert scale was used to assess the satisfaction of the respondents. Analysis of variance and independent-sample t test were used to examine differences in opinions among different groups of respondents. The results of this study could be important for instructors, HEIs that operate in similar conditions, policymakers in the field of HE in Serbia, as well as for present and future research in this area.
References
Alam, Z., Waqar, A., Zaman, K., Shehzadi, B., & Mehmood, Y. (2012). Perception of Students towards Distance Learning: A Case Study of Pakistan. Journal of American Science, 8(11), 509-517.
Banjević, K., Gardašević, D., Nastasić, A., & Radivojević, V. (2021). Student Performance: Is There Difference Between Traditional and Distance Learning. Journal of Innovative Business and Management, 13(2), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.32015/JIBM.2021.13.2.8.
Beaghan, P. J. (2006). A Survey of Student Attitudes Toward Distance Learning in Marketing Courses. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 8 (Summer), 38-43.
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, A. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
https://www.nat.rs/ (5.4.2022)
Işik, H. A., Karakis, R., & Guler, I. (2010). Postgraduate students` attitudes towards distance learning (The case study of Gazi University). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 218–222. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.139
Kentnor, H. (2015). Distance Education and the Evolution of Online Learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17 (1-2), 21-34.
National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NEAQA). Guide for students – Accreditation Outcomes Review. https://www.nat.rs/ishodi-akreditacije-i-spk/ (21.10.2021.)
Nguyen, Dat-Dao & Zhang, J. Y. (2011). An Empirical Study of Student Attitudes Toward Acceptance of Online Instruction and Distance Learning. Contemporary Issues in education Research, 4(11), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v4i11.6486
Pallant, J. (2009). SPSS: Survival Handbook (3rd Ed.). Microbook, Belgrade.
Rao, S., & Krishnan, V. (2015). Distance Education. Fourth International Conference on Higher Education: Special Emphasis on Management Education. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2600957
Roberts, T. G., Irani, A. T., Telg, W. R., & Lundy, K. L. (2005). The Development of an Instrument to Evaluate Distance Education Courses Using Student Attitudes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 51-64.
Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C. (2005). The Evolution of Distance Education. Distance Learning; Greenwich. 2(6), 17-21.
UNESCO (2021). COVID-19: Reopening and Reimagining Universities, Survey on higher education through the UNESCO National Commissions, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378174
Valenta, A., Therriault, D., Dieter, M., & Mrtek, R. (2001). Identifying Student Attitudes and Learning Styles in Distance Education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2), 111-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1882