COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MULTIMOORA, WASPAS AND WISP METHODS: THE CASE OF CANDIDATE SELECTION

Maja Stanujkic

doi:10.5937/jpmnt11-47703

Maja Stanujkic ReMade DOO, Novi Sad, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt11-47703

Keywords: human resources management, personnel selection, recruitment, MULTIMOORA, WASPAS, WISP, MCDM

Abstract

This article conducts a comparative examination of three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods: Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis plus Full Multiplicative Form (MULTIMOORA), Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), and Simple Weighted Sum Product (WISP). The analysis is carried out within the context of a personnel selection problem, focusing exclusively on income attributes in the MCDM framework. The results obtained from the analysis, specifically the formulated ranking lists, reveal a consensus in selecting the same alternative as the most suitable across all three MCDM methods. However, there are partial discrepancies in the ranking lists of alternatives, highlighting variations in their assessments.

References

Brans, J. P. (1982). Língénierie de la décision. Elaboration dínstruments dáide à la décision. Méthode PROMETHEE. In: Nadeau, R., Landry, M. (Eds.), L´aide a la Décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d´avenir. Presses de l´Université Laval, Québec, Canada, pp. 183-214.

Brauers, W.K.M., & Zavadskas, E.K. (2010). Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 5–24.

Gabus A., Fontela E. (1972). World Problems an Invitation to Further thought within the Framework of DEMATEL. Batelle Institute, Geneva Research Center, Geneva.

Gebrezgabher, S. A., Meuwissen, M. P., & Lansink, A. G. O. (2014). A multiple criteria decision making approach to manure management systems in the Netherlands. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 643-653.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer – Verlag.

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), Informatica 26(3): 435–451.

Levy, J. K. (2005). Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 19(6), 438-447.

MacCrimon, K. R. (1968). Decision Making among Multiple Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. Rand memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA.

Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering. (In Serbian).

Qin, Y., Qi, Q., Shi, P., Scott, P. J., & Jiang, X. (2020). Novel operational laws and power Muirhead mean operators of picture fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory for multiple criteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106853.

Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Revue franiaise d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, 2(8), 57–75.

Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234–281.

Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Karabasevic, D., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Ulutaş, A. (2021). An Integrated Simple Weighted Sum Product Method - WISP. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–12.

Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision 57(3), 2501–2519.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172.

Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., and Sarka, V. (1994). The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and economic development of economy, 1(3), 131-139.

Zavadskas, E. K., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Turskis, Z. (2022). Analysis of the simple WISP method results using different normalization procedures. Studies in informatics and control, 31(1), 5-12.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, 122(6), 3–6.