A FIELD STUDY EXAMINING BARRIERS TO LOGISTICS 4.0 USING POLYTOPIC FUZZY RANCOM

  • Selçuk KORUCUK Department of Logistics Management, Bulancak Kadir Karabas¸ Vocational School, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey
  • Ahmet AYTEKİN Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Hopa Economics and Administrative Sciences, Artvin Çoruh University, Hopa, Artvin, Turkey
Keywords: Logistics, logistics 4.0, MCDA, polytopic fuzzy sets, RANCOM

Abstract


Logistics companies are increasingly focusing more on technological transformation and development to save costs and transition to a more flexible structure, and their business objectives are closely tied with this framework. Changing business processes and technological revolutions force logistics companies to become more adaptive and agile, demanding the creation of organizational procedures in this context. To do this, the technology revolution, also known as logistics 4.0, is gaining popularity in the logistics industry and playing an essential role in cost savings for businesses. Logistics 4.0 applications are one approach for implementing procedures in logistics organizations in an effective and efficient manner. However, logistics 4.0 applications encounter many administrative and operational barriers. In this regard, the study identified and weighted barriers to logistics 4.0 applications in logistics companies with corporate identities. The polytopic fuzzy RANCOM approach was employed for this aim. The study found that "costs of implementing logistics 4.0" and "necessity of implementing process-driven management approaches" are the most significant barriers to implementing logistics 4.0, while "existence of cyber-attack threats" is the least important criterion.

References

Aytekin, A. (2022). Çok kriterli karar analizi. Nobel Bilimsel.

Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023). The Barriers Related to Smart Manufacturing Systems and an Application for the Selection of Innovation Management Model: The Case of Samsun Province. In Automation and Innovation with Computational Techniques for Futuristic Smart, Safe and Sustainable Manufacturing Processes (pp. 91-110). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Aytekin, A., Bozkurt, E., Orakçı, E., Uysal, M., Simic, V., Korucuk, S., & Pamucar, D. (2024). A bipolar neutrosophic combined compromise solution-based hybrid model for identifying blockchain application barriers and Benchmarking consensus algorithms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 108343.

Aytekin, A., & Korucuk, S. (2024). Evaluating performance-based logistics in manufacturing through polytopic fuzzy SWARA: A criterion assessment approach. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 3(2), 65-71.

Bag, S., Gupta, S. & Luo, Z. (2020). Examining the role of logistics 4.0 enabled dynamic capabilities on firm performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0311

Bamberger, V., Nansé, F., Schreiber, B., & Zintel, M. (2017). Logistics 4.0 – Facing digitalization-driven disruption. Prism, 1, 38-50.

Beg, I., Abbas, M., & Asghar, M. W. (2022). Polytopic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple-attribute decision-making problems. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(6), 2969-2981.

Ceran, Y., Ortakarpuz, M., & Erkoçak, H. E. (2022). Uluslararası Stratejik Pazarlama Kararları ve Lojistik 4.0 Bağlamında Lojistik Maliyetler ile Karlılık İlişkisi. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (35), 102-110.

Cimini, C., Lagorio, A., Pirola, F., & Pinto, R. (2019). Exploring human factors in Logistics 4.0: Empirical evidence from a case study. Ifac-Papersonline, 52(13), 2183-2188.

Çimen Atlı, E., Eroğlu, F., & Şekkeli, Z. H. (2024). Endüstri 4.0’in Lojistikte Yansimalari: Lojistik 4.0 Uygulamalari Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı: Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijitalleşmenin Sosyal Bilimlerde Yansımaları), 1753-1781. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1516467

Domingo Galindo, L. (2016). The challenges of logistics 4.0 for the supply chain management and the information technology (Master's thesis, NTNU).

Dixit, V., & Verma, P. (2022). Identification, assessment, and quantification of new risks for Logistics 4.0. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(6), 906–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2100331

Erdal, N. (2024). 4.0 Lojistik Ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Akıllı Teknolojilerin Kullanımı: Akıllı Eldiven Örneği. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 148(148), 62-77.

Erdoğdu, M. (2021). Development of Logistics Management and Relationship with Industry. International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology, 3(2), 91-112.

Facchini, F., Oleśków-Szłapka, J., Ranieri, L., & Urbinati, A. (2019). A maturity model for logistics 4.0: An empirical analysis and a roadmap for future research. Sustainability, 12(1), 86.

Ferraro, S., Cantini, A., Leoni, L., & De Carlo, F. (2023). Sustainable logistics 4.0: a study on selecting the best technology for internal material handling. Sustainability, 15(9), 7067.

Gönçer Demiral, D. (2021). Endüstri 4.0’ın Lojistik Boyutu: Lojistik 4.0. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (9), 231-251.

Görçün, Ö. F., Mishra, A. R., Aytekin, A., Simic, V., & Korucuk, S. (2024). Evaluation of Industry 4.0 strategies for digital transformation in the automotive manufacturing industry using an integrated fuzzy decision-making model. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 74, 922-948.

Karagöz, B., & Bumin Doyduk, H. B. (2020). Lojistik 4.0 Uygulamaları ve Lojistik Firmalarının Bakış Açısı. İnsan Ve İnsan, 7(23), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.513453948.

Khan, S., Singh, R., Haleem, A., Dsilva, J., & Ali, S. S. (2022). Exploration of Critical Success Factors of Logistics 4.0: A DEMATEL Approach. Logistics, 6, 1-14.

Korucuk, S. (2019). Lojistik .4.0 ve Uygulanabilirliği, Yayın Yeri:Akademisyen Yayınevi, Editör:Selçuk Korucuk, M. Esra Atukalp, Basım sayısı:1, Sayfa sayısı:184,, Bölüm Sayfaları:1 -19.

Korucuk, S., Tirkolaee, E. B., Aytekin, A., Karabasevic, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023). Agile supply chain management based on critical success factors and most ideal risk reduction strategy in the era of industry 4.0: application to plastic industry. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 1698-1719.

Korucuk, S., & Aytekin, A. (2024). Assessing the problems encountered by companies using e-logistics via a Polytopic fuzzy methodology: A case of Giresun province. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 2(1), 36-45.

Mercimek, A. F., & Geçkil, T. (2021). Endüstri 4.0’ın lojistik sektörüne uygulanması: Lojistik 4.0. Five Zero, 1(1), 57-77.

Nila, B., & Roy, J. (2024). Analysis of Critical Success Factors of Logistics 4.0 using D-number based Pythagorean Fuzzy DEMATEL method. Decision Making Advances, 2(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma21202430

Oleśków-Szłapka, J., & Stachowiak, A. (2019). The framework of logistics 4.0 maturity model. In Intelligent systems in production engineering and maintenance (pp. 771-781). Springer International Publishing.

Özdemir, A., & Özgüner, M. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 Ve Lojistik Sektörüne Etkileri: Lojistik 4.0. İşletme Ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 39-47.

Strandhagen, J. O., Vallandingham, L. R., Fragapane, G., Strandhagen, J. W., Stangeland, A. B. H., & Sharma, N. (2017). Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models. Advances in Manufacturing, 5, 359-369.

Stock T., & Seliger, G., (2016). Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536-541.

Szymańska, O., Adamczak, M., & Cyplik, P. (2017). Logistics 4.0-a new paradigm or set of known solutions?. Research in Logistics & Production, 7.

Taş, A., & Başaran Algöz, S. (2021). Lojistik Sektörü Özelinde Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalık. Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 23(41), 404-417.

Timm, I, J, & Lorig, F, (2015). Logistics 4.0-A Challenge for Simulation. In: Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE, 3118-3119.

Turğut, M., & Gürsoy, İ. (2023). Lojistik 4.0 Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1180817

Więckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., & Sałabun, W. (2023). RANCOM: A novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 122, 106114.

Winkelhaus, S., & Grosse, E. H. (2020). Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 18-43.

Yılmaz, Ü., & Duman, B. (2019). Lojistik 4.0 Kavramına Genel Bir Bakış: Geçmişten Bugüne Gelişim ve Değişimi. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 186-200.

Published
2024/12/04
Section
Original Scientific Paper