Mapping Western Balkans Civilian Capacities for Peace Operations

  • John Karlsrud Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Norway
  • Marko Milošević Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, Serbia

Abstract


Over the past several years the United Nations has increasingly emphasized the role that civilian capacities can play in post-conflict peacebuilding and called for member states to provide expertise. This special issue of the Journal of Regional Security will explore the civilian capacities of the Western Balkans countries and whether there is political will to respond to the call to deploy civilian capacities to UN peace operations and other international organizations. Looking at how Western Balkan countries train, roster and deploy civilian capacities, it will also explore whether increased cooperation in this area could be considered as a security community practice, nurturing bilateral relations and building cooperation in the Western Balkan region. The article finds that there is still a great gap between the expressed policy intent of providing civilian capacities to peace support operations, and putting it into practice. There is also lack of a strategic consideration of how the training and deployment of civilian capacities to peace operations could build legitimacy in international organizations and enhance regional cooperation among the states in the Western Balkans. The article recommends the initiation of a regional dialogue on training and rostering of civilian capacities, realizing synergies and furthering regional cooperation.


References

Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations: the Epistemic Foundation of International Relations. London: Routledge.

Adler, Emanuel. 2008. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities ofPractice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.

Adler, Emanuel, and Michael N. Barnett. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Adler, Emanuel and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.

Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1992. An agenda for peace: preventive diplomacy, peacemaking, and peace-keeping: report of the Secretary-General pursuant to the statement adopted by the summit meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: United Nations.

Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1995.A/RES/51/242: Supplement to An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.

De Coning, Cedric, John Karlsrud and Ingrid M. Breidlid. 2013.“Turning to the South: Civilian Capacity in the Aftermath of Conflict.” Global Governance 20(1): 135–152.

Deutsch, Karl W. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Duro, Foto. 2014. Shoulder to Shoulder: Albania’s Civilian Capacities In Support Of Capacity Development Abroad. Belgrade / Oslo: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy / Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.

Findlay, Trevor, ed. 1996. Challenges for the New Peacekeepers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pouliot, Vincent. 2006. “The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: ATheoretical Reply to Michael Cox.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 119–127.

Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1996.“Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO,” in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 357–399. New York: Columbia University Press.

Savkovic, Marko, and John Karlsrud. 2012. “Harnessing Civilian Capacity for Peace Support Operations: A Nascent Community?” Journal of Regional Security 7(2): 163–186.

Sotomayor, Arthuro C. 2014. The Myth of the Democratic Peacekeeper: Civil-Military Relations and the United Nations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Subotic, Jelena. 2012. “The Past Is Not Yet Over: Remembrance, Justice and Security Community in the Western Balkans.” Journal of Regional Security 7(2): 107–118.

United Nations. 2010. “Secretary-General’s remarks to Security Council Open Debate on Post-Conflict Peacebuilding”, the United Nations, http://www.un.org/sg/ statements/?nid=4495. Accessed 16 September 2012.

United Nations. 2012. Peace: Keep it. Build it. The Contribution of United Nations Peacekeeping to Early Peacebuilding: Strategy. New York: UN DPKO and DFS.

United Nations Civilian Capacity Team. 2014. “CivCap History.” Accessed 3 June 2014, http://www.civcapreview.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3746&language=en-US.

UN Department of Peacekeeping and Department of Political Affairs (2010) Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding: Clarifying the Nexus. Available at: http:// www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3- CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/PKO%20Peacebuilding%20Peacekeeping%20Nexus.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2012.

UN General Assembly. 2009.A/63/881–S/2009/304. Report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict, 11 June 2009. New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2010.S/2010/386. Progress report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict, 16 July 2010. New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2011.A/65/747–S/2011/85. Civilian capacity in the aftermath of conflict Independent report of the Senior Advisory Group, 22 February 2011. New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2011.A/66/311–S/2011/527. Civilian capacity in the aftermath of conflict, 19 August 2011.New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2012a.A/67/312–S/2012/645. Civilian capacity in the aftermath of conflict, 15 August 2012. New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2012b.A/RES/66/255. Civilian capacity in the aftermath of conflict, 15 August 2012. New York: United Nations.

Published
2018/08/29
Section
Articles