Democracies: “Sovereign” and “Illiberal”. The Russian-Hungarian Game of Adjectives and Its Implications for Regional Security
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore the Hungarian discourse of “illiberal democracy” alongside the older Russian doctrine of “sovereign democracy”, to see their possible implications for regional security and examine broader cultural and political backgrounds of these doctrines. The paper argues that the tension between notions of past historical greatness and the currently diminished power status results in the othering of the liberal order, which is seen as responsible for this degradation. The ideological subversions of the concept of democratic governance serve the purpose of self-legitimation, but also operate as ideological justifications for policies meant to revert the current status and thus carry significant security risks for regional stability. In Russia’s case, these risks are most plainly manifest as military interventions in neighbouring countries. While in Hungary they take the form of opportunistic self-interest, with a disregard for the rule of law and potential for further subversions of regional order.
References
Bohle, Dorothee and Béla Greskovits. 2018. “Politicising embedded neoliberalism: continuity
and change in Hungary’s development model.” West European Politics, December 17.
Bozóki, András and Dániel Hegedűs. An externally constrained hybrid regime: Hungary in the European Union. Democratization, April 13. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1455664.
Buzogány, Aron. 2017. “Illiberal democracy in Hungary: authoritarian diffusion or domestic causation?” Democratization: 1307-1325.
Cherniavsky, Michael. 1958. "Holy Russia: A Study in the History of an Idea." The American Historical Review, 63(3), 617-637. doi:10.2307/1848883.
Cianetti Licia, Dawson James and Seán Hanley. 2018. Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics 34 (3): 243-256.
Delcour, Laure and Kataryna Wolczuk. 2015. Spoiler or facilitator of democratization?: Russia's role in Georgia and Ukraine. Democratization, March 26. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.996135.
Derluguian, Georgi. 2011. “The Sovereign Bureaucracy in Russia’s Modernizations.” In Russia: The Challenges of Transformation, edited by P. Dutkiewicz and D. Trenin, 73–86. New York: New York University Press.
Engström Maria (2014) Contemporary Russian Messianism and New Russian Foreign Policy, Contemporary Security Policy, 35:3, 368, https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2014.965888
Fazekas, Mihály and István János Tóth. 2016 “From Corruption to State Capture: A New Analytical Framework with Empirical Applications from Hungary”. Political Research Quarterly 69(2): 320-334.
Gaufman, Elisaveta. 2017. Security Threats and Public Perception Digital Russia and the Ukraine Crisis. Cham, Pallgrave Macmillan.
Hegedűs, Daniel. 2019. “Rethinking the incumbency effect. Radicalization of governing populist parties in East-Central Europe. A case study of Hungary.” European Politics and Society, January 28.
Hungarian Government. 2014. “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp.” July 30. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-Orbán-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp.
Hungarian Government. 2015a. “Retrospective conference on the 25th anniversary of formation of the Hungarian National Assembly.” May 7. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/retrospective-conference-on-the-25th-anniversary-of-formation-of-the-hungarian-national-assembly.
Hungarian Government. 2015b. “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s speech at the 26th Congress of the Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Union”. December 17. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-Orbán-s-speech-at-the-26th-congress-of-the-fidesz-hungarian-civic-union.
Hungarian Government. 2015c. “Viktor Orbán: We should not use only the language of strength.” June 5. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/viktor-Orbán-we-should-not-use-only-the-language-of-strength.
Hungarian Government. 2015d. “Kommersant Interview with Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary.” February 20. Accessed November 5, 2019 https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/the-prime-minister-s-interview-with-russian-daily-newspaper-kommersant.
Hungarian Government. 2015e. “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s statement at the press conference held jointly with Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, President of the Arab Republic of Egypt.” June 5. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-Orbán-s-statement-at-the-press-conference-held-jointly-with-abdel-fattah-el-sisi-president-of-the-arab-republic-of-egypt.
Hungarian Government. 2017. “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s opening speech at the 2nd Budapest World Congress of Families.” May 25. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-Orbán-s-opening-speech-at-the-2nd-budapest-world-congress-of-families.
Hungarian Government. 2018. “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s speech at the 29th Bálványos Summer Open University and Student Camp”. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-29th-balvanyos-summer-open-university-and-student-camp.
Huszka, Beata. 2017. “Eurosceptic yet pro-enlargement: the paradoxes of Hungary’s EU policy.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 17(4): 591-609.
Inozemtsev, Vladislav. 2011. Neo-Feudalism Explained. The American Interest, March 1. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2011/03/01/neo-feudalism-explained/.
Iordachi, Constantin. 2012. “The Quest for Central Europe: Symbolic Geographies and Historical Regions.” In Regional and International Relations of Central Europe, edited by Zlatko Šabič and Petr Drulák, 40-61.
Jarábik, Balázs. 2017. The results of a traditionalist turn: Hungary’s democratic neo-feudalism. V4Revue, January 1. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://visegradrevue.eu/the-results-of-a-traditionalist-turn-hungarys-democratic-neo-feudalism/.
Kazharski, Aliaksei. 2019a. “Civilizations as ontological security? Stories of the Russian Trauma.” Problems of Post-Communism, May 1.
Kazharski, Aliaksei. 2019b. Eurasian integration and the Russian world: Regionalism as an identitary enterprise. New York, Central European University Press.
Kazharski, Aliaksei. “An ‘ad hoc regionalism’? The Visegrád Four in the ‘post-liberal’ age.” Polity, forthcoming 2020.
Keller-Alánt, Ákos. 2019. “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe, October 2. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://chinaobservers.eu/whose-line-is-it-anyway/.
Krasner, Stephen. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Krekó, Péter and Lóránt Győri. 2017. “Hungary: a state captured by Russia”. Heinrich Böll Foundation, October 11. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.boell.de/en/2017/10/11/hungary-state-captured-russia.
Krekó, Peter and Zsolt Enyedi. 2018. “Explaining Eastern Europe: Orbán's Laboratory of Illiberalism.” Journal of Democracy 29(3): 39-51.
Magyar, Bálint. Post-communist mafia state: the case of Hungary. 2016. Budapest : Central European University Press.
Makarychev, Andrey. 2013a. “Russia and ‘International Democracy’: Unlocking the Concept.” In Decentering the West: The Idea of Democracy and the Struggle for Hegemony, edited by V. Morozov, 45–64. Surrey: Ashgate.
Makarychev, Andrey. 2013b. “Foreign Policies of Putin’s Regime: Strategies of Politicization and Depoliticization.” In Russia’s Changing Economic and Political Regimes: The Putin Years and Afterwards, edited by A. Makarychev and A. Mommen, 77–90. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Morozov, Viatcheslav. 2013. “Introduction”. In Decentering the West: The Idea of Democracy and the Struggle for Hegemony, edited by V. Morozov, 45–64. Surrey: Ashgate.
Neumann, Iver B. 1999. Uses of the Other. “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Neumann, Iver B. 2017. “Russia’s Return as True Europe, 1991–2017”. Conflict and Society: Advances in Research 3 (2017): 78–91.
Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2018. “Hungary Parliamentary Elections 8 April 2018. ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report.” June 27, Warsaw.
Orbán, Viktor. 2018 “Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s speech at the 6th Summit of the Cooperation Council of Turkic-speaking States.” Miniszterelnok.hu, September 3. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://www.miniszterelnok.hu/prime-minister-viktor-orbans-speech-at-the-6th-summit-of-the-cooperation-council-of-turkic-speaking-states/.
Orenstein, Mitchell A. and R. Daniel Kelemen. 2017. “Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 87-102.
O’Connor, Tom. 2017 “Russia’s Putin Reveals his biggest mistake: trusting the West.” Newsweek, October 19. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://www.newsweek.com/russia-putin-reveal-biggiest-mistake-trusting-west-688998.
Palonen, Emilia. 2018 “Performing the nation: the Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, July 25.
Papp, Attila Z. 2017. “Trickster Logics in the Hungarian Dual-Citizenship Offer.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 23:18–32.
Pehe, Jiří. 2018. “Czech Democracy Under Pressure.” Journal of Democracy 29 (3): 65-77.
Pogonyi, Szabolcs. 2015. “Transborder Kin-minority as Symbolic Resource.” Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 14 (3): 73-98.
Pomerantsev, Peter. “Putin’s Rasputin.” London Review of Books. Vol 33 No. 20. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putins-rasputin.
Putin, Vladimir. 2005. “Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation”. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22931.
Putin, Vladimir 2007. “Vystupleniye i diskusiya na Myunkhenskoy konferentsii po voprosam politiki bezopasnosti. President of Russia, February 10. Accessed November 5, 2019. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034.
Pytlas, Bartek. 2013. Radical-right narratives in Slovakia and Hungary: historical legacies, mythic overlaying and contemporary politics. Patterns of Prejudice 47 (2): 162-183.
Rieker, Pernille, ed. 2016. External Governance as Security Community Building. The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rutland, Peter. 2010. “The Oligarchs and Economic Development.” In After Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, edited by S. Wegren and D. Herspring, 4th ed., 159-182. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.
Sakwa, Richard. 2010. “Political Leadership.” In After Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, edited by S. Wegren and D. Herspring, 4th ed., 17–38. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.
Silitski, Vitali. 2009. “Tools of Autocracy.” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 42–46.
Skoybeda, Ulyana. 2014. “Ya bol’she ne zhivu v zavoyovannoy strane.” Komsomolskaya Pravda, March 25. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.kp.ru/daily/26210/3095671/
Surkov, Vladislav. 2006. “Nacionalizaciya Budushchego.” [Nationalisation of the future] Ekspert, November 20. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20061205211300/http://www.expert.ru/printissues/expert/2006/43/nacionalizaciya_buduschego/
Verkhovsky, Alexander and Emil Pain. 2010. “Tsivilizatsionny natsionalism: rossiyskaya versiya ‘osobogo puti’” [Civilizational nationalism: Russian version of a “distinct path”]. In Ideologiya ‚osobogo puti‘ v Rossii i Germanii: istoki, soderzhaniye, posledstviya [Ideology of a “distinct path” in Russia and Germany: origins, meaning, consequences], edited by E. Pain, 171–210. Мoscow: Tri kvadrata.
Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. Yale University Press.
Zalan, Eszter. 2018. “Asylum for Macedonia's ex-PM puts Orban on spot.” EUobserver, November 14. Acessed November 5, 2019. https://euobserver.com/political/143391
Zgaga, Blaž. 2018. “Slovene media owned by oligarchs, corrupt politicians.” Reporters Without Borders, February 13. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://rsf.org/en/news/slovene-media-owned-oligarchs-corrupt-politicians
Zgut, Edit and Robert Csehi. 2019. “Orbán’s Peacock Dance.” In Saving Europe. Aspen Review 3/2019. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://www.aspenreview.com/article/2019/orbans-peacock-dance/
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. / The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Regional Security and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s pre-print / author’s post-print (accepted version) / publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website prior or during the submission process / at any time after the acceptance of the manuscript / at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.