VREDNOVANJE KVALITETA ODGOVORA KOJE JE GENERISAO CHATGPT
Sažetak
Tradicionalni modeli obrazovanja postaju zastareli i suočavamo se sa izazovom korišćenja veštačke inteligencije koja podrazumeva prilagođavanje nastavnih metoda, pojavu novih sredstava i upotrebu novih tehnologija. U dosadašnjim istraživanjima utvrđeno je da ona može da dovede do dobrobiti koje se odnose na personalizaciju obrazovanja, poboljšanje kvaliteta nastave, praćenje napretka u učenju, unapređenje alata za učenje, povećanje motivacije. Predstavljanje ChatGPT-a, kompanije OpenAI, od samog početka privlači pažnju različite populacije. Smatramo da je za savremenog učitelja veoma važno da prati inovacije i prilagođava nastavu novim generacijama učenika, te smo s toga nastojali da u ovom istraživanju istražimo vrednovanje kvaliteta odgovora u oblasti obrazovanja koje je generisala ova aplikacija podržana veštačkom inteligencijom. Na osnovu saznanja dobijenih proučavanjem relevantne literature kreirali smo upitnik na koji su odgovarali studenti završne godine Fakulteta za obrazovanje učitelja i vaspitača-Univerziteta u Beogradu (Srbija). Najpre nas je zanimalo da utvrdimo kakva su dosadašnja iskustva budući učitelji imali sa korišćenjem ChatGPT-a, zatim smo procenili u kojoj meri je korišćenje ChatGPT-a doprinelo njihovom radu. Pružili smo mogućnosti da kritički procene kvalitet odgovora na postavljena pitanja posredstvom ove aplikacije, a na kraju i da izraze svoje stavove prema kvalitetu odgovora koje je generisao ChatGPT. Dobijeni rezultati su izloženi i prodiskutovani. Iako je većina naših ispitanika čula za ovu aplikaciju, iskustva koja su imali nisu bila planski stečena u cilju njihovog profesionalnog usavršavanja, te je to prostor za unapređivanje programa njihovog institucionalnog obrazovanja. Studenti su iskazali motivisanost i spremnost da procenjuju mogućnosti korišćenja ovog jezičkog modela i uče kako da ga iskoriste uz svest da veštačka inteligencija ne može zameniti njihovu ulogu, ali da je postala ključan alat u obrazovanju čime im otvara nove mogućnosti usavršavanja nastavnog procesa i unapređenja procesa učenja.
Reference
Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131
Álvarez-Herrero, J. F. (2024). Opinion of Spanish Teachers About Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in Education. In IoT, AI, and ICT for Educational Applications: Technologies to Enable Education for All (pp. 163-172). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Amaro, I., Della Greca, A., Francese, R., Tortora, G., & Tucci, C. (2023, July). AI unreliable answers: A case study on ChatGPT. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 23-40). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35894-4_2
Aziz, N., Nordin, M.J., Jadid Abdulkadir, S., & Salih, M.M.M. (2021). Digital Addiction: Systematic Review of Computer Game AddictionImpact on Adolescent Physical Health. Electronics, 10 (9).
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10090996
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Clark, D. (2020). Artificial ıntelligence for learning: How to use AI to support employee development. Kogan Page Publishers.
Firat, M. (2023).What ChatGPT means for universities: Perception of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: a literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., ... & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
Gupta, B., Mufti, T., Sohail, S.S., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2023). ChatGPT: A Brief Narrative Review. Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2275851
Ignjatović, A., & Stevanović, L. (2023). Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.28-
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, А. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in School Children’s Education: Evidence from a School Lesson. Sustainability, 15 (18), 14025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151814025
Johnson, D., Goodman, R., Patrinely, J., Stone, C., Zimmerman, E., Donald, R., ... & Wheless, L. (2023). Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: an evaluation of the Chat-GPT model. Research square.https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2566942/v1
Jeong, E., Kim, D., & Lee, D. (2016). Why Do Some People Become Addicted to Digital Games More Easily? A Study of Digital Game Addiction from a Psychosocial Health Perspective. International journal of human–computer interaction, 33(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1232908
Kelly, S., Kaye, S. A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022, March). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 755914). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Klarin, Z. i Livaić, T. (2023). Primjena chatgpt jezičnog modela umjetne inteligencije u visokom obrazovanju. U Dragan Zlatović (ur.), Zbornik radova Veleučilišta u Šibeniku (str. 99-112). Veleučilište u Šibeniku.
Khoso, J. F., Ali, N., & Aslam, N. (2023). Use of Chat-GPT and AI Tools by Undergraduates: Students andTeachers’ Perspective. Spry Contemporary Educational Practice. 2(2), 215-238.
Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2011). Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.015
Li, L., Fengchao, Y., & Zhang, E. (2024). A systematic review of learning task design for K-12 AI education: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100217
Lindner, A., Romeike, R., Jasute, E., & Pozdniakov, S. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence. In 12th International conference on informatics in schools,“Situation, evaluation and perspectives”, ISSEP.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1192
Ma, Z. H., Hwang, W. Y., & Shih, T. K. (2020). Effects of a peer tutor recommender system (PTRS) with machine learning and automated assessment on vocational high school students’ computer application operating skills. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00162-9
Mandic, D. (2023). Report on Smart Education in the Republic of Serbia. In: Zhuang, R., et al. Smart Education in China and Central & Eastern European Countries. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7319-2_11
Miščević Kadijević, G., Mandić, D., & Bojanić, J. (2019). Preschool teachers' assessment of the integrative approach to Environmental Education. Inovacije u nastavi-časopis za savremenu nastavu, 32(3), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1903090M
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self‐regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Robledo, D. A. R., Zara, C. G., Montalbo, S. M., Gayeta, N. E., Gonzales, A. L., Escarez, M. G. A., & Maalihan, E. D. (2023). Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) Regarding the Educational Use of ChatGPT among Preservice Teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(10), 1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.10.1965
Rospigliosi, P. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: what questions should we ask of ChatGPT?. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191
Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
Senol, Y., ̧Senol, F.B., Can Ya ̧sar, M. (2023). Digital game addiction of preschool children in the Covid-19 pandemic: Social emotionaldevelopment and parental guidance. Current Psychology, 43(23), 839-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04323-8
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative higher education, 49(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
Stoković, G., Matović, S. & Ristić, M. (2023).Osposobljavanje vaspitača i učitelja za imeplentaciju obrazovnih robota. U Vladimir Katić (ur.), Trendovi razvoja: Univerzitet pod novim izazovima (str. 218-221). Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka.
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023a). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023b). Powerful or mediocre? Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives on using ChatGPT in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2266490
Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers' roles. Heliyon, 10, e24289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
Vigotski. L. (1974). Mišljenje i govor. Beograd: Nolit.
Von Garrel, J., & Mayer, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanities and social sciences communications, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
