RAZVOJ I VALIDACIJA ŠESTODIMENZIONALNOG INVENTARA ZA SAMOPROCENU PSIHOPATSKIH CRTA 6-PSHP

Đorđe Cupać; Nevena Mijatović; Isidora Micić; Svetlana Pavlović; Katarina Stekić

doi:10.5937/psistra22-19141

Đorđe Cupać Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju
Nevena Mijatović Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju
Isidora Micić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju
Svetlana Pavlović Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju
Katarina Stekić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/psistra22-19141

Sažetak

Cilj ovog rada bio je konstruisanje i validacija Šestodimenzionalnog testa za samoprocenu psihopatskih crta (6-PSHP). Pri konstrukciji pilot verzije instrumenta uzeto je u obzir više modela na osnovu kojih je izdvojeno 10 indikatora koji se odnose na afektivne, bihejvioralne i interpersonalne deficite. Pilot istraživanje instrumenta sa 100 stavki je sprovedeno na 554 ispitanika putem interneta, nakon čega je broj stavki smanjen na 50. Validaciona studija izvršena je na 307 ispitanika koji su pripadali srednjoškolskoj (232 ispitanika, 51,7 % ženskog pola) ili zatvorskoj populaciji (75 ispitanika, svi muškog pola). Finalna verzija testa se sastoji od 38 stavki. Faktorskom analizom izdvojeno je 6 faktora koji mere crte psihopatije: grandioznost, manipulativnost, nasilnost, površinske partnerske veze, bezosećajnost i dezinhibicija. Konvegentna valjanost ispitana je korelacijama sa testom samoprocene psihopatije SRP-III, testom makijavelizma MACH IV i testom ličnosti HEXACO-60. Većina korelacija faktora 6-PSHP i faktora SRP-III je značajna i pozitivna, kao i većina korelacija faktora 6-PSHP sa ukupnim skorom MACH-IV. Kanoničkom korelacionom analizom pokazano je da su sve facete HEXACO-60 modela dobri prediktori faktora testa 6-PSHP što je u skladu sa teorijskim pretpostavkama.Test poseduje dijagnostičku valjanost s obzirom da uspešno predviđa pripadnost polu i populaciji (srednjoškolska ili zatvorska). Svi faktori validiranog instrumenta su dobri prediktori recidiva i socioseksualnosti kod zatvorske populacije, dok su se faktori Grandioznosti, Bezosećajnosti i Nasilnosti pokazali kao dobri prediktori socioseksulnosti i kod srednjoškolske populacije što govori o dobroj prognostičkoj valjanosti ovog test. Šestodimenzionalni inventar za samoprocenu psihopatskih crta (6-PSHP) zadovoljava kriterijume valjanog testa koji bi mogao biti u upotrebi kao instrument za procenu psihopatskih crta i u istraživačke i u praktične svrhe na srpskom govornom području, uz neophodnu replikaciju instrumenta i faktorske strukture sa uzorkom odraslih pripadnika opšte populacije.

Reference

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manualof mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of personality assessment, 91(4), 340-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878

Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, S. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences 47: 734–739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020

Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological assessment 13(2): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171

PJ Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2014). Psychopathy, DSM–5, and a caution. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 335–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000078

De Vries, R. E., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The Dutch HEXACO Personality Inventory: Psychometric properties, self–other agreement, and relations with psychopathy among low and high acquaintanceship dyads. Journal of Personality Assessment 90(2): 142-151.

PP Edens, J. F., Marcus, D.K., Lilienfeld, S.O., & Poythress, N. G. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115(1): 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.131

Geis, F., & Christie, R. (1970). Overview of experimental research. Studies in Machiavellianism, 285-313.

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 679-682.

Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and individual differences, 1(2), 111-119.

PP Hare, R.D., Hart, S.D., & Harpur, T.J. (1991). Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 100: 391-398.

PP Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the Hare psychopathy checklist. Revised 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

PP Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4: 217–246. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452

Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Psychopathy. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Preuzeto sa: https://books.google.rs/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nqOBunfGoNgC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&ots=MRhalhltnb&sig=q2yw8Jy6797kQ7Jc6-9EyFg-VdI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

PP Harpur, T. J., & Hare, R. D. (1994). The assessment of psychopathy as a function of age. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 604–609.

PP Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1982). Cognitive models of criminal violence based upon intelligence and psychopathy levels. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 546–557.

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488– 524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3

Mathieu, C., Neumann, C., Babiak, P., Hare, R.D. (2015). Corporate Psychopathy and the Full-Range Leadership Model. Assessment 22(3), 267-278.

Međedović, J. (2013). Psihopatija, ličnost i kriminalni recidiv: Multimetodski pristup (Doktorska disertacija). Preuzeto sa: NaRDuS (National Repository of Dissertations in Serbia). http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/3368/Disertacija.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Miller, J. D., Watts, A., & Jones, S. E. (2011). Does psychopathy manifest divergent relations with components of its nomological network depending on gender?. Personality and Individual Differences 50(5): 564-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.028

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality 36(6): 556-563.

Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492

PP Subotić, S. (2013). Review of methods for determining the number of factors and components to retain (in EFA and PCA). Applied Psychology, 6(3), 203-229.

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220.

Visser, B. A., Pozzebon, J. A., Bogaert, A. F., & Ashton, M. C. (2010). Psychopathy, sexual behavior, and esteem: It’s different for girls. Personality and Individual Differences 48(7): 833-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.008

Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. In 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Preuzeto sa: