Afektivna vezanost i mentalizacija nastavnika kao prediktori stilova upravljanja razredom

  • Danica Nikolić Vesković Prirodno-matematički fakultet Niš
Ključne reči: stilovi upravljanja razredom, afektivna vezanost, mentalizacija, nastavnik

Sažetak


Cilj ovog istraživanja je ispitivanje da li se na osnovu afektivne vezanosti i mentalizacije nastavnika može predvideti sklonost ka određenom stilu upravljanja razredom kao i da li usavršavanje u oblasti upravljanja razredom modifikuje odnos između prediktorskih i kriterijumskih varijabli. Istraživanje je obuhvatilo 100 nastavnika razredne nastave, 86 ženskog i 14 muškog pola, starosti od 28 do 64 godina i radnim stažom od 1 do 39 godina. Podaci su prikupljeni instrumentima i to:  Inventar za samoprocenu stilova nastavnika u upravljanju razredom – ISNUR; upitnik „Iskustvo u bliskim odnosima”, srpska modifikovana i adaptirana verzija, SM-ECR-R; Upitnik za ispitivanje menatalizacije UM. Rezultati pokazuju da dimenzija afektivne vezanosti, anksioznost i mentalizacija sebe doprinose sklonosti ka neintervenišućem i intervenišućem stilu upravljanja razredom dok mentalizacija drugih i usavršavanje u oblasti upravljanja razredom dobrinose sklonosti ka interakcionističkom stilu upravljanja razredom. Ustanovljen je i moderatorski efekat usavršavanja na odnos mentalizacije drugih i interakcionističkog stila upravljanja razredom.

Reference

1.      Allen, J. G. (2006). Mentalizing in practice. Handbook of mentalization-based treatment, 3-30.

2.      Banjac, S., Altaras-Dimitrijević, A., & Dimitrijević, A. (2013). Odnos vezanosti, mentalizacije i intelektualnih sposobnosti u adolescenciji. Psihološka istraživanja, 16(2), 175–190.

3.      Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)9(1), 11–15.

4.      Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational psychology review21(2), 141-170.

5.      Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Volume 2 Separation, New York: Basic Book.

6.      Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (str. 46–76). New York: The Guilford Press.

7.      Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644

8.      Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., & Jolić Marjanović, Z. (2018). The Mentalization Scale (MentS): A self-report measure for the assessment of mentalizing capacity. Journal of personality assessment100(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1310730

9.      Đigić, G. (2013). Ličnost nastavnika i stilovi upravljanja razredom. Универзитет у Нишу.

10.  Djigic, G., & Stojiljkovic, S. (2011). Classroom management styles, classroom climate and school achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences29, 819-828.

11.  Djigić, G., & Stojiljković, S. (2014, September). Inventory for Teachers’ Self-assessment in Classroom Manegement Styles–Development and its Psychometric Characteristics. In International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria.

12.  Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2012). What is mentalization? The concept and its foundations in developmental research. In N. Midgley & I. Vrouva (Eds.), Minding the child: Mentalization-based interventions with children, young people and their families (11–34). Hove: Routledge.

13.  Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Moran, G. S., & Higgitt, A. C. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental states: The reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant mental health journal12(3), 201–218.

14.  Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and psychopathology9(4), 679-700.

15.  Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective-functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to adult attachment interviews. London: University College London, 161-2.

16.  Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of personality and social psychology78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350

17.  Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of personality and social psychology67(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.430

18.  Guerrero, L. K. (1996). Attachment‐style differences in intimacy and involvement: A test of the four‐category model. Communications Monographs63(4), 269–292.

19.  Hanak, N., & Dimitrijevic, A. (2013). A Serbian version of modified and revised experiences in Close Relationships Scale (SM–ECR–R). Journal of personality assessment95(5), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.778271

20.  Hazen, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

21.  Howes, C., & Ritchie, S. (2002). A matter of trust: Connecting teachers and learners in the early childhood classroom (Vol. 84). Teachers college press.

22.  Kennedy, J. H., & Kennedy, C. E. (2004). Attachment theory: Implications for school psychology. Psychology in the Schools41(2), 247-259.

23.  Kesner, J. E. (2000). Teacher characteristics and the quality of child–teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 38(2), 133–149.

24.  Lifshin, U., Kleinerman, I. B., Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2020). Teachers’ attachment orientations and children’s school adjustment: Evidence from a longitudinal study of first graders. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships37(2), 559-580.

25.  Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1993). Validation of an Inventory of Classroom Management Style: Differences between Novice and Experienced Teachers.

26.  Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational leadership61(1), 6-13.

27.  Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The Attachment Behavioral System in Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, and Interpersonal Processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology,Vol. 35, pp. 53–152. Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01002-5

28.  Morris-Rothschild, B. K., & Brassard, M. R. (2006). Teachers' conflict management styles: The role of attachment styles and classroom management efficacy. Journal of school psychology44(2), 105-121.

29.  Recktenvald, K., & Donelli, T. M. S. (2019). Nursery Educators’ Implicit Mentalizing. Trends in Psychology27, 895-908.

30.  Scharfe, E., & Bartholomew, K. (1995). Accommodation and Attachment Representations in Young Couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12(3), 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595123004

31.  Sher-Censor, E., Nahamias-Zlotolov, A., & Dolev, S. (2019). Special education teachers’ narratives and attachment style: Associations with classroom emotional support. Journal of child and family studies28(8), 2232-2242.

32.  Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971>

33.  Swan, P., & Riley, P. (2015). Social connection: empathy and mentalization for teachers. Pastoral Care in Education33(4), 220-233.

Objavljeno
2024/01/04
Rubrika
Naučni članci