Saturated linear unit as an universal symmetric activation function for deep learning

  • Maja Lutovac Banduka aRT-RK LLC (former Department of RT-RK Institute, Computer Based Systems), 2v Dunavska, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
  • Vladimir Milićević Faculty of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Dositejeva 19, 36000 Kraljevo, Serbia
  • Igor Franc Faculty of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Dositejeva 19, 36000 Kraljevo, Serbia
  • Nemanja Zdravković Faculty of Information Technology, Belgrade Metropolitan University, Tadeuša Košćuška 63, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nikola Dimitrijević cFaculty of Information Technology, Belgrade Metropolitan University, Tadeuša Košćuška 63, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: artificial neural networks, closed-form solutions, classification decision, feature extraction, machine learning algorithms, deep learning

Abstract



There is a number of symmetric activation functions used in artificial neural networks for deep learning. In this paper, we propose a universal activation function based on the Saturated Linear Unit (SaLU) that can be used instead of any known symmetric activation function. It is not necessary for classification tasks to have an exact calculation of the probability of detected classes. The classification decision is made based on the highest probability for the input values. We propose, as a proof of concept, that the two most commonly used hyperbolic tangent and algebraic sigmoid activation functions can be effectively replaced by SaLU by choosing a single parameter. Moreover, the theoretical step function can also be replaced by SaLU for a wider transition range. All derivations use symbolic processing. Also shown is a visualization of the range of inputs that result in a suitable classification. This can help scientists and programmers design complex machine learning algorithms and understand how deep learning algorithms work.

References

Khan, S., Rahmani, H., Shah, S., & Bennamoun, M. (2018). A Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer Vision, Switzerland, Springer Nature, 2018, 54-56.

Bernard, E. (2022). Introduction to Machine Learning, Champaign, IL, USA: Wolfram Media

Wolfram, S. (2023). An Elementary Introduction to the Wolfram Language, 3rd ed., Champaign, IL, USA: Wolfram Media

Lutovac, M.D., & Tosic, D. (2014). Schematic Solver, Mathematica application package, symbolic signal processing, software implementation, mouse driven interactive drawing tool, https://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/TechNotes/4814/

Milićević, V., Franc, I., Lutovac Banduka, M., Zdravković, N., & Dimitrijević, N. (2025). Symbolic analysis of classical neural networks for deep learning, International Journal for Quality Research, 19 (1), 85-100.

Lutovac Banduka, M., & Lutovac, M. (2024). Multiplierless neural networks for deep learning, in Proc. 13th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, Budva, Montenegro, Jun. 11-14, 2024, 262-265.

Zhao, F., & Huang, S. L. (2022). On the universally optimal activation function for a class of residual neural networks, AppliedMath, 2 (4), 574-584.

Kamienny, P.A., d’Ascoli, S., Lample, G., & Charton, F. (2022). End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers,” presented at the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022), New Orleans, USA, Nov. 28th - Dec. 9th 2022, Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst., 35, 10269-10281.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016), Deep Learning, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Setzu, M., Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Turini, F., Pedreschi, D., & Giannotti, F. (2021), GLocalX - from local to global explanations of black box AI models, Artificial Intelligence, 103457, 294, 1-15

Wiratsin, O., & Ragkhitwetsagul, C. (2025). Effectiveness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques for Improving Human Trust in Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Literature Review, IEEE Access, 13, 121326-121350, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3575022

Lăzăroiu, G., Andronie, M., Iatagan, M., Geamanu, M., Stefanescu, R., & Diamarescu, I. (2022). Review deep learning-assisted smart process planning, robotic wireless sensor networks, and geospatial big data management algorithms in the internet of manufacturing things, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11 (5), 277.

Dubey, S.R., Singh S.K., & Chauduri, B.B. (2021). Activation functions in deep learning: A comprehensive survey and benchmark, arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14545.

Stursa, D. & Dolezel P. (2019). Comparison of ReLU and linear saturated activation functions in neural network for universal approximation, 22nd International Conference on Process Control (PC19), 11-14 June 2019, Strbske Pleso, Slovakia

Wang, J.H., Cao, J., Li, W., Yu, P., & Huang, K. (2019). A novel parallel accelerated CRPF algorithm," Applied Intelligence, 50 (3), 849-859.

Chen, J., & Pan. Z. (2023). Saturated Non-Monotonic Activation Functions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07537.

Lau, M.M., & Hann Lim, K. (2018). Review of Adaptive Activation Function in Deep Neural Network," 2018 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES). 03-06 December 2018, Sarawak, Malaysia

Yang, X., Gao, Z., & Zhang, J. (2020). Event-driven H∞ control with critic learning for nonlinear systems, Neural Networks, 132, 30-42.

Lee, Y., Park, C., & Kang, S. (2023). Deep Embedded Clustering Framework for Mixed Data, IEEE Access, 11, 33-40.

Zhang, N., Zhao, J., Ma. L., Kong, H., & Li, H. (2022). Tool Wear Monitoring Based on Transfer Learning and Improved Deep Residual Network, IEEE Access, 10, 119546-119557.

Ren, Y.M., Alhajeri, M.S., Luo, J., & Chen, S. (2022). A tutorial review of neural network modeling approaches for model predictive control, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 165 (3), 107956.

Published
2026/06/09
Section
Original Scientific Paper