INCIDENCE AND THERAPY OF RELAPSE AFTER ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Abstract
Introduction/Aim: Disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the most common and most severe post transplantation complications and represents the leading cause of treatment failure and patient death. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and types of relapse, in relation to the time of occurrence; analyze the influence of conditioning regimens on relapse occurrence; review the therapeutic options after the occurrence of relapse; assess the prognosis in patients with relapse.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 58 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Pre-transplantation therapy was performed with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) or a myeloablative regimen (MAC). The diagnosis of relapse was made through myelogram analysis, analysis of cytogenetics, analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD), analysis of cellular chimerism, and analysis of immunohematological chimerism of blood group antigens. A database was formed in relation to the examined patient characteristics. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rang test.
Results: MAC (43 patients) was used more frequently than RIC (15 patients), as a conditioning regimen. After transplantation, 18 (34%) out of 53 patients had a relapse. The choice of regimen did not affect the occurrence of relapse, but patients on the RIC regimen lived longer (38.5 ± 7 months) as compared to patients on the MAC regimen (27.8 ± 3.5 months). However, the difference in survival was without statistical significance (p = 0.318). The median survival time of patients who relapsed was 26 ± 5 months, while patients without disease relapse had a median survival time of 41 ± 4 months.
Conclusion: Patients who received reduced-intensity regimens (RIC) had a longer survival time, without an increase in the relapse rate. In future, consideration should be given to the inclusion of patients older than 60 years, as candidates for transplantation, as well as to the possible use of prophylactic therapy aimed at preventing relapse in high-risk patients.
References
Barrett AJ, Battiwalla M. Relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Expert Rev Hematol. 2010 Aug;3(4):429-41. doi: 10.1586/ehm.10.32.
Bacher U, Talano JA, Bishop MR. Monitoring and prevention of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan;18(1 Suppl):S62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.028.
Loren AW, Porter DL. Donor leukocyte infusions after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006 Mar;18(2):107-14. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000208781.61452.d3.
Porter D, Levine JE. Graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia after donor leukocyte infusion. Semin Hematol. 2006 Jan;43(1):53-61. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2005.09.005.
van den Brink MR, Porter DL, Giralt S, Lu SX, Jenq RR, Hanash A, et al. Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan;16(1 Suppl):S138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.023.
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al., editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 4th edition. Lyon: IARC Press 2017.
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Basak GW, Chabannon C, Corbacioglu S, Duarte R, et al; European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The EBMT activity survey report 2017: a focus on allogeneic HCT for nonmalignant indications and on the use of non-HCT cell therapies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Oct;54(10):1575-1585. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0465-9.
D'Souza A, Lee S, Zhu X, Pasquini M. Current Use and Trends in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1417-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.035.
Gyurkocza B, Sandmaier BM. Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation: one size does not fit all. Blood. 2014 Jul 17;124(3):344-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-514778.
Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004.
Gratwohl A. The EBMT risk score. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jun;47(6):749-56. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.110.
Martino R, de Wreede L, Fiocco M, van Biezen A, von dem Borne PA, Hamladji RM, et al.; Acute Leukemia Working Party the subcommittee for Myelodysplastic Syndromes of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European group for Blood Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT). Comparison of conditioning regimens of various intensities for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT using HLA-identical sibling donors in AML and MDS with <10% BM blasts: a report from EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jun;48(6):761-70. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.236.
Ringdén O, Labopin M, Ehninger G, Niederwieser D, Olsson R, Basara N, et al. Reduced intensity conditioning compared with myeloablative conditioning using unrelated donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4570-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9692.
Luger SM, Ringdén O, Zhang MJ, Pérez WS, Bishop MR, Bornhauser M, et al. Similar outcomes using myeloablative vs reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant preparative regimens for AML or MDS. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;47(2):203-11. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.69.
Çiftçiler R, Göker H, Demiroğlu H, Aladağ E, Aksu S, Haznedaroğlu İC, et al. Comparison of Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Cohort Study. Turk J Haematol. 2019 May 3;36(2):88-96. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2019.2018.0220.
Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Logan BR, Wu J, Devine SM, Porter DL, et al. Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1154-1161. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7091.
Mielcarek M, Storer BE, Flowers ME, Storb R, Sandmaier BM, Martin PJ. Outcomes among patients with recurrent high-risk hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Oct;13(10):1160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.06.007.
Schmid C, Labopin M, Nagler A, Niederwieser D, Castagna L, Tabrizi R, et al.; Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Treatment, risk factors, and outcome of adults with relapsed AML after reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012 Feb 9;119(6):1599-606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375840.
Ciurea SO, Labopin M, Socie G, Volin L, Passweg J, Chevallier P, et al. Relapse and survival after transplantation for complex karyotype acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer. 2018 May 15;124(10):2134-2141. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31311.
