A VIEW OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTH PROMOTION TEAMS
TEAMWORK IN HEALTH PROMOTION
Abstract
The success of modern health promotion programs, which have been brought about by political decision at the local, national, and international levels, depend on the effectiveness of health promotion teams. In this article, the multidisciplinary approach is reviewed as a modern approach to teamwork for health promotion, which is a prerequisite for effective health promotion. The multidisciplinary approach includes a wide range of experts in public health, with different knowledge, qualifications, and skills, brought together to contribute to the provision of health promotion services from their own perspective.
References
1. Gottwald M. Health promotion models. In Davis S, editor. Rehabilitation: the use of theories and models in practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 131-146.
2. Koelen MA, Vaandrager L, Wagemakers A. The Healthy ALLiances (HALL) framework: prerequisites for success. Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i132-i138. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr088.
3. Baron-Epel O, Drach-Zahavy A, Peleg H. Health promotion partnerships in Israel: motives, enhancing and inhibiting factors, and modes of structure. Health Promot Int. 2003 Mar;18(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/18.1.15.
4. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Educ Q. 1996 Feb;23(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300105.
5. World Health Organization. Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
6. Pike S, Forster D. Health Promotion for All. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1995.
7. Armstrong R, Doyle J, Lamb C, Waters E. Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28(2):168-72. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl013.
8. Martin V, Charlesworth J, Henderson E. Managing in Health and Social Care. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2010.
9. Naidoo J, Wills J. Public health and health promotion: developing practice. 3th ed. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Elsevier; 2010.
10. Berridge V. Multidisciplinary public health: what sort of victory? Public Health. 2007 Jun;121(6):404-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.004.
11. Naidoo J, Wills J. Health Promotion: Foundations for Practice. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Elsevier; 2009.
12. Davies M, Macdowall W. Health Promotion Theory. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006.
13. Whitehead D. The Health Promoting University (HPU): the role and function of nursing. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Aug;24(6):466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.05.003.
14. Kapelus G, Karim R, Pimento B, Ferrara G, Ross C. Interprofessional health promotion field placement: applied learning through the collaborative practice of health promotion. J Interprof Care. 2009 Jul;23(4):410-3. doi: 10.1080/13561820802432364.
15. Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, Benishek LE, Thompson D, Pronovost PJ, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298.
16. Das TK, Teng BS. Alliance constellations: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review.2002;27(3): 445-56. doi: 10.2307/4134389.
17. Wiggins B, Anastasiou K, Cox DN. A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1177/0890117120928789.
18. Provan KG, Sebastian JG. Networks within networks: service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 1998;41(4):453-63. doi: 10.2307/257084.
19. Orme J, de Viggiani N, Naidoo J, Knight T. Missed opportunities? Locating health promotion within multidisciplinary public health. Public Health. 2007 Jun;121(6):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.005.
20. Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1998;13(2):99-120. doi: 10.1093/heapro/13.2.99.
21. Drach-Zahavy A, Baron-Epel O. Health promotion teams' effectiveness: a structural perspective from Israel. Health Promot Int. 2006 Sep;21(3):181-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal019.
22. Moon H, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Ilgen DR, West B, Ellis APJ, et al. Asymmetric adaptability: dynamic team structures as one-way streets. The Academy of Management Journal. 2004; 47(5): 681-96. doi: 10.2307/20159611.
23. Leach B, Morgan P, Strand de Oliveira J, Hull S, Østbye T, Everett C. Primary care multidisciplinary teams in practice: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 29;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0701-6.
24. Schor A, Bergovoy-Yellin L, Landsberger D, Kolobov T, Baron-Epel O. Multidisciplinary work promotes preventive medicine and health education in primary care: a cross-sectional survey. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Jun 6;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0318-4.
25. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369.
26. Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL. Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis. J Manage. 2011;37(3):709-43. doi: 10.1177/0149206310365001.
27. Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA. Group composition and decision making: how member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996;67(1):1-15. doi: 10.1006/OBHD.1996.0061.
28. Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J Manage. 2003;29:801-30. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00080-1.
29. Rubin IM, Beckhard R. Factors influencing the effectiveness of health teams. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1972 Jul;50(3):317-35.
30. Johnson A, Nguyen H, Groth M, White L. Reaping the rewards of functional diversity in healthcare teams: why team processes improve performance. Group Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 1;43(3):440-74. doi: 10.1177/1059601118769192.
31. Jehn KA. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42(3):530-57. doi: 10.2307/2393737.
32. de Wit FR, Greer LL, Jehn KA. The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):360-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024844.
33. O’Neill TA, Allen NJ, Hastings SE. Examining the ‘‘pros’’ and ‘‘cons’’ of team conflict: a team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Hum Perform. 2013;26(3):236-60. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2013.795573.
34. O’Neill TA, McLarnon MJ, Hoffart GC, Woodley HJ, Allen NJ. The structure and function of team conflict state profiles. J Manage. 2018;44(2):811-36. doi: 10.1177/0149206315581662.
35. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350-83. doi: 10.2307/2666999.
36. Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305.
37. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941-66. doi: 10.1002/job.413.
38. Dunn AM, Scott C, Allen JA, Bonilla D. Quantity and quality: increasing safety norms through after action reviews. Hum Relat. 2016;69(5):1209-32. doi: 10.1177/0018726715609972.
39. Keiser NL, Arthur W. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jul;106(7):1007-1032. doi: 10.1037/apl0000821.
40. Miller CJ, Kim B, Silverman A, Bauer MS. A systematic review of team-building interventions in non-acute healthcare settings. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2961-9.
41. Rico R, Sa´nchez-Manzanares M, Gil F, Gibson C. Team implicit coordination processes: a team knowledge–based approach. Acad Manage Rev. 2008;33(1):163-84. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276.
42. Jansen L. Collaborative and interdisciplinary health care teams: ready or not? J Prof Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;24(4):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.013.
43. Heitkemper M, McGrath B, Killien M, Jarrett M, Landis C, Lentz M, et al. The role of centers in fostering interdisciplinary research. Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):115-122.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.008.
44. Scriven A, Orme J. Health Promotion Professional Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Education UK; 2001.
45. Bracht N, editor. Health promotion at the community level: New advance. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1999. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204789
46. Omer K, Mhatre S, Ansari N, Laucirica J, Andersson N. Evidence-based training of frontline health workers for door-to-door health promotion: a pilot randomized controlled cluster trial with Lady Health Workers in Sindh Province, Pakistan. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.018.
47. Wagemakers A, Vaandrager L, Koelen MA, Saan H, Leeuwis C. Community health promotion: a framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health. Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.12.008.
48. Fleming ML, Parker E, Gould T, Service M. Educating the public health workforce: Issues and challenges. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Apr 9;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-6-8.
49. Levy M, Gentry D, Klesges LM. Innovations in public health education: promoting professional development and a culture of health. Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302351.
50. Koh HK. Educating future public health leaders. Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302385.
51. Koh HK, Nowinski JM, Piotrowski JJ. A 2020 vision for educating the next generation of public health leaders. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.018.
52. Jansen MW, De Vries NK, Kok G, Van Oers HA. Collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):295-307. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.005.
53. Hosman CM, Clayton R. Prevention and health promotion on the international scene: the need for a more effective and comprehensive approach. Addict Behav. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):943-54. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00127-1.
