THE USE OF ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESIS IN REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
Abstract
Introduction: The number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures shows a growing trend in orthopedic hospitals worldwide. Although TKA has an excellent long-term survival rate, it is not surprising that, given the increased life expectancy and aging population with a more significant number of comorbidities, the frequency of revision TKA will also rise. Common indications for revision TKA represent aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures.
Case reports: A 60-year-old female patient presented to our hospital with complaints of pain and instability of her right knee, accompanied by decreased range of motion. Primary TKA was performed in another institution nine years ago. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated aseptic loosening of TKA components, with subsidence of the tibial component into varus malposition. A 73-year-old female patient was admitted to our Hospital because of an injury to her left knee resulting from a fall from a standing height that happened five days before the presentation. Primary TKA was performed 14 years ago in our Hospital. A trauma X-ray series of the injured knee revealed a Lewis type IIB periprosthetic fracture of the tibial plateau. In both patients, revision TKA was performed using a rotating hinge implant with augmentation of the tibial defect caused by loosening in the first case and fracture in the second case. Postoperative recovery was successful in both cases, with radiographic imaging showing adequate position of the implant at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusion: The use of rotating hinge knee prostheses in revision total knee arthroplasty demonstrates promising outcomes, particularly in cases involving significant bone loss and instability.
References
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2606-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6.
Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:83-7. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31812f79a9.
Long WJ, Bryce CD, Hollenbeak CS, Benner RW, Scott WN. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17;96(18):e159. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01259.
Neuhaus HJ, Maier K. Rotating hinge prosthesis for primary and revision knee arthroplasty: comparison and indications. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 30;2022:9930675. doi: 10.1155/2022/9930675.
Ucpunar H, Camurcu Y, Buyuk AF, Aydin A, Tas SK, Sahin V. Comparison of contemporary surgical indications for revision total knee arthroplasty between 2005-2011 and 2012-2017 in a Referral Center. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Jan;10(1):32-7. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.47457.2326.
Tarazi JM, Chen Z, Scuderi GR, Mont MA. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2021 Nov;34(13):1396-401. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735282.
Smolle MA, Hörlesberger N, Maurer-Ertl W, Puchwein P, Seibert FJ, Leithner A. Periprosthetic fractures of hip and knee – a morbidity and mortality analysis. Injury. 2021 Nov;52(11):3483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015.
Canton G, Ratti C, Fattori R, Hoxhaj B, Murena L. Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome. Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):118-28. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6522.
Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Dec;(345):113-24.
von Hintze J, Niemeläinen M, Sintonen H, Nieminen J, Eskelinen A. Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04205-9.
Lim JBT, Pang HN, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):529-35. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02598-x.
Malcolm TL, Bederman SS, Schwarzkopf R. Outcomes of varus valgus constrained versus rotating-hinge implants in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016 Jan-Feb;39(1):e140-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151228-07.
Kouk S, Rathod PA, Maheshwari AV, Deshmukh AJ. Rotating hinge prosthesis for complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.020.
Spranz DM, Koch KA, Reiner T, Hetto P, Gotterbarm T, Merle C. Mid-term results of complex primary total knee arthroplasty using a rotating-hinge implant. Knee. 2022 Jan; 34:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.001.
Efe T, Roessler PP, Heyse TJ, Hauk C, Pahrmann C, Getgood A, et al. Mid-term results after implantation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses: primary versus revision. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012 Dec 11;4(4):e35. doi: 10.4081/or.2012.e35.
Schlechter M, Theil C, Gosheger G, Moellenbeck B, Schwarze J, Puetzler J, et al. Good mid-term implant survival of a novel single-design rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6113. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196113.
