SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD – ABUSE OF FINANCIAL (IN)ABILITY OR SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE FAMILY PLANNING METHOD

  • Melanija Jančić Mihić Vanredni profesor
Ključne reči: surrogate motherhood, family planning, female infertility treatment, surrogation, biomedically assisted reproduction, intended parenthood, assisted parenthood, third-party reproduction

Sažetak


Surrogate motherhood, as one of the most sensitive and controversial issues not only in the field of contemporary family law, but also in the field of human rights law in general, has its foundations both in medical advancements and achievements and in the evolution of legal and societal awareness. Surrogacy, as an important family-building pathway, is primarily driven by a profound desire of intended parents for parenthood and the fulfillment of the most important role in life. In this paper, the author will analyze surrogate motherhood, especially focusing on the proposed legal framework of altruistic-gestational surrogacy within the Pre-draft of the Civil Code of Serbia. Using normative and axiological methods, it is questionable whether and which type of surrogacy should be understood as an abuse of rights and medical achievements. Having in mind numerous advantages of precise and restrictive provisions of surrogate motherhood as proposed in the Pre-draft of the Civil Code, it would be preferable to consider surrogacy, established as a method of female infertility treatment, a socially acceptable method of family planning. 

Reference

Boruta Krakowski, Mirosław. 2019. “Surrogate Motherhood from the Perspective of Sociology and Cultural Anthropology.” In Fundamental Legal Problems of Surrogate Motherhood – Global Perspective, ed. Piotr Mostowik, 133–161. Warsaw: Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości.

Callahan, Sidney. 2014. “The Ethical Challenges of the New Reproductive Technologies.” In Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues for the 21st Century - 3rd Edition, eds. Eileen. E. Morrison and Elizabeth Furlong, 79–96. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Cammu, Nola, and Machteld Vonk. 2024. “Chapter 2: The Significance of Genetics in Surrogacy.” In Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law, eds. Katarina Trimmings, Sharon Shakargy and Claire Achmad, 8–24. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.4337/9781802207651.00007

Cvejić Jančić, Olga, i Melanija Jančić. 2021. „Zaštita prava deteta rođenog u inostranstvu uz pomoć surogat majke.” U Zbornik radova 34. Susreta Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava Slobodan Perović – Primena prava i pravna sigurnost, ur. Jelena S. Perović Vujačić, 5–26. Beograd: Kopaonička škola prirodnog prava Slobodan Perović.

Čović, Ana. 2023. „Usluga surogat majčinstva u pravnim sistemima evropskih država.” U Zbornik radova Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske unije, 647–668. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta, Institut za pravne i društvene nauke. DOI: 10.46793/XIXMajsko.647C

De Groot, David. 2025. “Surrogacy: The Legal Situation in the EU.” European Parliament. February 2025. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/769508/EPRS_BRI(2025)769508_EN.pdf

Europa.eu. n.d. “Rules on Surrogacy.” Last accessed on August 14, 2025. https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/family/children/rules-on-surrogacy/index_en.htm

Field, Martha A. 1990. Surrogate Motherhood – The Legal and Human Issues, Expanded Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Gender.Study. n.d. “Gender Based Violence – Understanding Surrogacy: Types, Processes, and Definitions.” Last accessed August 14, 2025. https://gender.study/gender-based-violence/understanding-surrogacy-types-processes-definitions/.

Horsey, Kirsty. 2024. “The Future of Surrogacy: a Review of Current Global Trends and National Landscapes.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 48 (5): 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103764

Jančić, Melanija. 2021. “Legal Aspects and Challenges of Intentional Parenthood in Serbia.” In International Survey of Family Law, ed. Margaret Brinig, 419–434. Cambridge: Intersentia.

Kaur, Harleen. 2021. Law and Policies on Surrogacy: Comparative Insights from India. Signapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Lahl, Jennifer. 2016. “Chapter 38: Gestational Surrogacy Concerns: The American Landscape.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, ed. E. Scott Sills, 287–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela. 2013. “Mothering for Money: Regulating Commercial Intimacy.” Indiana Law Journal 88 (4): 1223–1278.

McLathcie Lois, and Jennifer Lea. 2022. Surrogacy, Law & Human Rights. ADF International.

Pascoe, John. 2018. “Sleepwalking through the Minefield: Legal and Ethical Issues in Surrogacy.” Singapore Academy of Law Journal 30: 455–483. DOI: 10.3316/informit.076046860521301

Patel Nayana Hitesh, Yuvraj Digvijaysingh Jadeja, Harsha Karsan Bhadarka, Molina Niket Patel, Niket Hitesh Patel, Nilofar Rahematkhan Sodagar [Patel et al.]. 2018. “Insight into Different Aspects of Surrogacy Practices.” Journal of Reproductive Sciences 11 (3): 212–218. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17

Prednacrt Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije [PGZ]. 2015. Paragraf.rs. 26. jun 2015. https://www.paragraf.rs/nacrti_i_predlozi/280519-prednacrt-gradjanskog-zakonika-republike-srbije.html

Republički fond za zdravstveno osiguranje [RFZO]. 2022. „Uputstvo za sprovođenje lečenja neplodnosti postupcima biomedicinski potpomognutog oplođenja (BMPO) na teret sredstava obaveznog zdravstvenog osiguranja.” 8. decembar 2022. https://www.rfzo.rs/download/vto/Uputstvo%20za%20sprovodjenje%20lecenja%20neplodnosti%20postupcima%20BMPO%2008.12.2022.pdf

Ustav Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 98/2006 i 115/2021.

Writing Group on behalf of the ESHRE Ethics Committee, Francoise Shenfield, Basil Tarlatzis, Guiliana Baccino, Theofano Bounartzi, Lucy Frith, Guido Pennings, Veerle Provoost, Nathalie Vermeulen, Heidi Mertes [Writing Group on behalf of the ESHRE Ethics Committee et al.]. 2025. “Ethical Considerations on Surrogacy.” Human Reproduction 40 (3): 420–425. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaf006

Zakon o biomedicinski potpomognutoj oplodnji [ZBMPO], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 40/2017 i 113/2017 – dr. zakon.

Zakon o zabrani diskriminacije [ZZD], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 22/2009 i 52/2021.

Zakon o zdravstvenom osiguranju [ZZO], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 25/2019 i 92/2023.

Objavljeno
2025/10/27
Rubrika
Članci