Conflict and Tolerance in Urban Outdoor Recreation: A case study in Antalya and Berlin

  • Selcuk Sayan Independent researcher, Liselotte Herrmann Straße 26, 10407 Berlin
  • Dennis Kalisch

Abstract


Europe has become ‘a continent of immigration’ in the course of the last half century, and European societies have experienced growing ethnic and cultural diversity. Accordingly diverse social groups with various cultural backgrounds interact in everyday life. In this context, urban green spaces (UGS) provide opportunities and places for recreation, stress relief, interaction and encounters with other people. In contrast to a dense built environment of the cities, parks can be a platform for breaking social segregation. Personal characteristics of the users or visitors including cultural and socio-demographic background have been found to have an influence on outdoor recreation use patterns. Immigrants participate in recreation activities, but sometimes in different ways than members of the host community due to their diverse habits, preferences and different behaviour. However, little is known about these differences in recreation patterns in the urban environment particularly in continental Europe. Thus, the objective of the study is to a) explore urban outdoor recreation patterns of immigrants, b) investigate the interrelation between cultural background and recreation patterns and c) analyse the role of UGS for visitors’ encounters of different migration background in Antalya, Turkey and Berlin, Germany. Findings from qualitative interviews in both cities demonstrate that tolerance is the precondition for a successful integration into the host society. Respondents agreed that green spaces have a high potential for supporting the social integration process. Language can be a barrier for interaction and common interests are needed as a starting point. They agreed that the host community in both cities have a high willingness to accept foreigners.

References

Aizlewood, A., Bevelander, P., Pendakur, R. 2006. Recreational Participation Among Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants in Canada and the Netherlands. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 4(3), 1-32.

Balkır, C., Kırkulak, B. 2009. Turkey, the new destination for international retirement migration. In: Migration and Mobility in Europe: Trends, Patterns and Control (Eds. H. Fassmann, M. Haller and D. Lane), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK, 123-143.

Bell, S., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröbstl, U., Simpson, M. 2007. Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: A European perspective. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 1(2), 1- 46.

Bennet, S.A., Yiannakoulias, N., Williams, A.M., Kitchen, P. 2012. Playground accessibility and neighbourhood social interaction among parents. Social indicators research 108(2), 199-213.

Buijs, A.E., Elands, B., Langers, F. 2009. No wilderness for immigrants: cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 91 (3), 113-123.

Carothers, P., Vaske, J.J., Donnelly, M.P. 2001. Social Values versus Interpersonal Conflict among Hikers and Mountain Bikers. Leisure Sciences 23, 47-61.

Das, K. V., Fan, Y., French, S. A. 2017. Park-use behavior and perceptions by race, Hispanic origin, and immigrant status in Minneapolis, MN: implications on park strategies for addressing health disparities. Journal of immigrant and minority health 19(2), 318-327.

Dines, N., Cattell, V. 2006. Public spaces, social relations and well-being. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

Fleishman, L., Feitelson, E., Salomon, I. 2004. The role of cultural and demographic diversity in crowding perception: evidence from nature reserves in Israel. Tourism Analysis 9,23–40.

Gentin, S., 2011. Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in Europe: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10, 153-161.

Germann-Chiari, C., Seeland, K. 2004. Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research. Forest Policy and Economics 6, 3-13.

Gobster, P. H. 2002. Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure sciences 24(2), 143-159.

Gramann, J. 1996. Ethnicity, Race, and Outdoor Recreation: A Review of Trends, Policy, and Research. Final Report R-96-1. Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences: Texas A&M University.

Heringa, A., Bolt, G., Dijst, M., Van Kempen, R. 2014. Individual Activity Patterns and the Meaning of Residential Environments for Inter-ethnic Contact. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 105, 64-78.

Horolets, A. 2012. Migrants’ leisure and integration. Report. Institute of Public Affairs:Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszaw.

Jacob, G.R., Schreyer, R. 1980. Conflict in Outdoor Recreation: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Leisure Research 12, 368-380.

Jay, M., Schraml, U. 2009. Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants - uses, perception and integrative potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8, 283-294.

Jay, M., Peters, K., Buijs, A.E., Gentin, S., Kloek, M.E., O'Brien, L. 2012. Towards access for all? Policy and research on access of ethnic minority groups to natural areas in four European countries. Forest Policy and Economics 19, 4-11.

Jay, M., Schraml, U. 2014. Diversity in mind: Towards a differentiated understanding of migrants’ recreational practices in urban forests. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 13(1), 38-47.

Kabisch, N., Haase, D. 2014. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 122, 129-139.

Kabisch, N., Qureshi, S., Haase, D. 2015. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces – A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50, 25-34.

Kaźmierczak, A. 2013. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning 109, 31-44.

Kim, J. 2012. Exploring the Experience of Intergroup Contact and the Value of Recreation Activities in Facilitating Positive Intergroup Interactions of Immigrants. Leisure Sciences 34, 72-87.

Kivijärvi, A. 2015. Fragility of leisure ties between ethnic minority and majority youth - an empirical case from Finland. Leisure Studies 34, 150-165.

Kloek, M., Peters, K., Wagner, L. 2015. Reflections on measuring discrimination: The case of outdoor recreation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 106(3), 353-358.

Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd., London.

Leikkilä, J., Faehnle, M., Galanakis, M. 2013. Promoting interculturalism by planning of urban nature. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12, 183-190.

Leujak, W., Ormond, R. 2007. Visitor perceptions and the shifting social carrying capacity of south Sinai’s coral reefs. Environmental Planning 39,472–489.

Madanipour, A. 1999. Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning B Planning and Design 26, 879-891.

Manning, R., 2011. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.

Manning, R.E., Anderson, L.E. 2012. Managing Outdoor Recreation: Case Studies in the National Parks. CABI, UK

Mata-Codesal, D., Peperkamp, E., Tiesler, N.-C. 2015. Migration, migrants and leisure: meaningful leisure?. Leisure Studies 34(1), 1-4.

Matejskova, T., Leitner, H. 2011. Urban encounters with difference: the contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography 12 (7), 717-741.

Microcensus Berlin. 2016. Statistical Report. Results from Mikrozensus in Berlin 2015. Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (in German).

Nesdale, D., Todd, P., 2000. Effect of contact on intercultural acceptance: a field study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 24, 341-360.

Okólski, M. 2012. European Immigrations: Trends, Structures and Policy Implications. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

Peschardt, K.K., Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U.K. 2012. Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11, 235-244.

Peters, K. 2010. Being Together in Urban Parks: Connecting Public Space, Leisure, and Diversity. Leisure Sciences 32, 418-433.

Peters, K., Elands, B., Buijs, A. 2010. Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion?. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9, 93-100.

Peters, K., de Haan, H. 2011. Everyday spaces of inter-ethnic interaction: the meaning of urban public spaces in the Netherlands. Leisure/Loisir 35, 169-190.

Priskin, J. 2003. Tourist perceptions of degradation caused by coastal nature-based recreation. Environmental Management 32(2), 189–204.

Sasidharan, V., Willits, F., Godbey, G. 2005. Cultural differences in urban recreation patterns: an examination of park usage and activity participation across six population subgroups. Managing Leisure 10, 19-38.

Sayan, S., Karagüzel, O. 2010. Problems of outdoor recreation: the effects of visitors’ demographics on the perception of Termessos National Park, Turkey. Environmental Management 45, 1257–1270.

Sayan, S., Krymkowski, D.H., Manning, R.E., Valliere, W.A., Rovelstad, E.L. 2013. Cultural Influence on Crowding Norms in Outdoor Recreation: A Comparative Analysis of Visitors to National Parks in Turkey and the United States. Environmental Management 52, 493-502.

Seeland, K., Dübendorfer, S., Hansmann, R. 2009. Making friends in Zurich's urban forests and parks: The role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 10-17.

Stack, J., Iwasaki, Y. 2009. The role of leisure pursuits in adaptation processes among Afghan refugees who have immigrated to Winnipeg, Canada. Leisure Studies 28, 239-259.

United Nations, 2014. International migration and development. Report of the Secretary-General A/69/207.

Vaske, J.J., Donnelly, M.P., Wittmann, K., Laidlaw, S. 1995. Interpersonal versus social-values conflict. Leisure Sciences 17,205-222.

Vaske, J.J., Needham, M.D., Cline Jr,R.C. 2007. Clarifying Interpersonal and Social Values Conflict among Recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research 39(1), 182-195.

Published
2018/05/18
Section
Članci