The effects of local endometrial injury made by hysteroscopy on in vitro fertilization outcome

Dejan S Mitić; Marin Bašić; Aleksandra Petrić; Snežana Stamenović

doi:10.2298/VSP160526233M

Dejan S Mitić Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Niš, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Marin Bašić Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Niš, Serbia
Aleksandra Petrić Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Niš, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Snežana Stamenović Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Niš, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP160526233M

Keywords: infertility;, fertilization in vitro;, hysteroscopy;, iatrogenic disease;, uterus;, wounds and injuries;, pregnancy outcome

Abstract

Bacngraund/Aim. Regardless of embryos quality, an appropriate endometrial thickness and a successful embryo transfer (ET), implantation remains a difficulty for a favorable outcome of an in vitro fertilization (IVF). Numerous studies with the aim of increasing implantation rate and pregnancy rate suggest local endometrial injury (LEI) prior to the IVF procedure. Hysteroscopy is a method becoming more widely used both with patients after a failed IVF cycle and with patients before the first IVF, considering the large incidence of uterus cavum pathological states which have a negative impact on the favorable outcome. However, there is still no consensus reached over LEI, the way and time of its performing or its impact. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of hysteroscopically made local endometrial lesion on the IVF procedure outcome, both in the first and in the next IVF cycle and also to examine if the new method of LEI provoking using bipolare electrode has a favorable impact on post IVF pregnancy success. Methods. Total of 81 patients had hysteroscopy performed 30–50 days prior to IVF, 40 of which had LEI made during hysteroscopy (the LEI group) using bipolar electrode in a way not described in any available literature. Remaning histeroscopically treated patients (n = 41) had no LEI (the non-LEI group). The control group included 151 patient who had IVF performed with no prior hysteroscopy and LEI. Results. The rate of clinical pregnancies after LEI was statistically more significant in comparison to the control group (52.50% vs 34.44%, p < 0.05) and it meant 2.1 time bigger chance to conceive (OR=2.10; 95% CI: 1.04 – 4.26; p < 0.05). We noticed differences in the implantation rate between the LEI group and the non-LEI group on one side and the control group on the other, in favor of the two groups subjected to hysteroscopy (23.89%, 25.47% vs 18.18%, respectively), but they were not of any statistical significance. Not significantly higher rate of pregnancy was present, after the first and the next IVF, both in the LEI and the non-LEI group when compared to the control one. Conclusion. New method of LEI provoking by bipolar electrode in the process of hysteroscopy is a simple and safe method allowing higher rate of clinical pregnancies and doubling the probabilty of the positive IVF outcome.

References

Pundir J, Pundir V, Omanwa K, Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T. Hys-teroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28(2): 151‒61.

Trninić-Pjević A, Kopitović V, Pop-Trajković S, Bjelica A, Bujas I, Tabs D, et al. Effect of hysteroscopic examination on the out-come of in vitro fertilization. Vojnosanit Pregl 2011; 68(6): 476‒80. (Serbian)

Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo P, Barash A, Or Y, Mor G, et al. Bi-opsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: The mechanism of action. Reproduction 2015; 149(1): 75‒85.

Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, Barash A, Or Y, Schechtman E, et al. Local injury of the endometrium induces an inflammatory response that promotes successful implantation. Ferti. Steril 2010; 94(6): 2030‒6.

Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Maheshwari A, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, et al. Endometrial injury in women under-going assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (7): CD009517.

Mahran A, Ibrahim M, Bahaa H. The effect of endometrial in-jury on first cycle IVF/ICSI outcome: A randomized con-trolled trial. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 2016; 14(3): 193‒8.

Kara M, Aydin T, Turktekin N, Karacavus S. Efficacy of the local endometrial injury in patients who had previous failed IVF-ICSI outcome. Iran J Reprod Med 2012; 10(6): 567‒70.

Yeung TW, Chai J, Li RH, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A random-ized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(11): 2474‒81.

Parsanezhad ME, Dadras N, Maharlouei N, Neghahban L, Keramati P, Amini M. Pregnancy rate after endometrial injury in couples with unexplained infertility: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11(11): 869‒74.

Zarei A, Alborzi S, Dadras N, Azadi G. The effects of endo-metrial injury on intrauterine insemination outcome: A ran-domized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med 2014; 12(9): 649‒52.

Werner MD, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Bergh PA, Scott RT. Endometrial disruption does not improve implanta-tion in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blasto-cysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(4): 557‒62.

Shokeir T, Ebrahim M, El-Mogy H. Hysteroscopic-guided local endometrial injury does not improve natural cycle pregnancy rate in women with unexplained infertility: Randomized con-trolled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42(11): 1553‒7.

El-Khayat W, Elsadek M, Saber W. Comparing the effect of of-fice hysteroscopy with endometrial scratch versus office hys-teroscopy on intrauterine insemination outcome: A random-ized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 194: 96‒100.

Seval MM, Şükür YE, Özmen B, Berker B, Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C. Does adding endometrial scratching to diagnostic hys¬teroscopy improve pregnancy rates in women with recurrent in-vitro fertilization failure? Gynecol Endocrinol 2016; 32(12):957‒60.

Narvekar SA, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas M, Rao KA. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF?, A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010; 3(1): 15‒9.

Karimzade MA, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Local injury to the endometrium on the day of oocyte retrieval has a nega¬tive impact on implantation in assisted reproductive cycles: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281(3): 499‒503.