Analysis of reconstructive methods in surgical treatment of small nasal skin defects

  • Marko Stevan Jovic Clinic of Burns, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: nose, carcinoma, basal cell, reconstructive surgical procedures, surgical flaps, transplants, treatment outcome, esthetics,

Abstract


Background. Surgeons often face with the problem when selecting a reconstructive method for nasal skin defects.  We have analyzed the functional and aesthetic results of different reconstructive methods used for skin defects in different regions of the nose.

Methods. The study involved 44 patients with basocellular carcinoma in nasal area. The nasal skin was divided into four subunits - the tip, the alar lobules, the sidewalls and the dorsum. An average skin defect size was 10 mm. Local flaps and full thickness skin grafts were used in the study. We have analyzed the functional and aesthetic results of different reconstructive methods used for nasal defects in different regions of the nose, twelve months after the surgery.

Results. The study has shown that different reconstructive methods produce different functional and aesthetic results in the same nasal subunits and the same reconstructive method produce different results in different nasal subunits.

Conclusions. Estimation the postoperative functional and aesthetic characteristics of different reconstructive methods is one of the basic precondition of successful reconstruction.

References

Menick FJ. Practical details of nasal reconstruction. Plast Re-constr Surg 2013; 131(4): 613−30.

Monarca C, Rizzo MI, Palmieri A, Fino P, Parisi P, Scuderi N. Isl-and pedicle and bilobed flaps in ala and back nose reconstruc-tion: a prospective comparative analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36(5): 1168−74.

Jewett BS. Repair of small nasal defects. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2007; 40(2): 337−60.

Adams DC, Ramsey ML. Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on full- and split-thickness skin grafts, free carti-lage grafts, and composite grafts. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31(8 Pt 2): 1055−67.

Reich RH, Hausamen JE. Esthetic aspects of various flap tech-nics for covering defects of the facial skin. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 1989; 34: 157−60. (German)

Monarca C, Rizzo MI, Palmieri A, Chiummariello S, Fino P, Scuderi N. Comparative analysis between nasolabial and island pedicle flaps in the ala nose reconstruction. Prospective study. In Vivo 2012; 26(1): 93−8.

Chang JS, Becker SS, Park SS. Nasal reconstruction: the state of the art. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12(4): 336−43.

Salgarelli AC, Bellini P, Multinu A, Magnoni C, Francomano M, et al. Reconstruction of nasal skin cancer defects with local flaps. J Skin Cancer 2011; 20(11): 181−93.

Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal recon-struction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76(2): 239−47.

Kennedy WR, Vanhove GF, Lu S, Tobias J, Bley KR, Walk D, et al. A randomized, controlled, open-label study of the long-term effects of NGX-4010, a high-concentration capsaicin patch, on epidermal nerve fiber density and sensory function in healthy volunteers. J Pain 2010; 11(6): 579−87.

Kozarski JV. Some biological characteristics of transferred free flaps. Microsurgery 2007; 27(5): 360−8.

Terzis JK. Functional aspects of reinnervation of free skin grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58(2): 142−56.

Waris T, Rechardt L, Kyösola K. Reinnervation of Human Skin Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72(4): 439−45.

Santoni-Rugiu P. An Experimental Study on the Reinnervation of Free Skin Grafts and Pedicle Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38(2): 98−104.

Woodward KL, Kenshalo DR. The recovery of sensory function following skin flaps in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79(3): 428−35.

Pontén B. Quantative measurements of sweat gland activity us-ing the ninhydrin method. Acta Physiol Scand 1960; 48(1): 20−8.

Millard DR Jr. Aesthetic reconstructive rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1981; 8(2): 169−75.

Hoasjoe DK, Stucker FJ, Aarstad RF. Aesthetic and anatomic considerations for nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 1994; 10(4): 317−21.

Burget GC, Menick FJ. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994.

Singh DJ, Bartlett SP. Aesthetic considerations in nasal recon-struction and the role of modified nasal subunits. Plast Re-constr Surg 2003; 111(2): 639−48.

Riml S, Wallner H, Larcher L, Amann U, Kompatscher P. Aesthetic Improvements of Skin Grafts in Nasal Tip Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 35(4): 475−9.

Shah AR, Zoumalan R, Constantinides MS. Aesthetic repair of small to medium-sized nasal defects. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24(1): 105−19.

Hollier H, Stucker F. Local Flaps for Nasal Reconstruction. Fa-cial Plast Surg 1994; 10(4): 337−48.

Jewett BS. Repair of small nasal defects. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13(2): 283−99.

Silapunt S, Peterson S, Alam M, Goldberg LH. Clinical appearance of full-thickness skin grafts of the nose. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31(2): 177−83.

Published
2017/03/03
Section
Original Paper