Implications of anesthetic techniques on cardiocirculatory stability in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Biljana Stosic Medical faculty Nis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/afmnai40-38044
Keywords: anesthesia, cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, cardiovascular diseases

Abstract


Background and aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of Volatile Induction and Maintenance of Anaesthesia (VIMA) and Target. Controlled Infusion (TCI) on Cardiovascular stability in New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade II patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods: In the present study, 90 patients were randomized into two groups depending on whether they received VIMA or TCI. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure were monitored continuously and recorded in five time intervals.

Results: Statistical analysis showed that VIMA with sevoflurane provides better cardiocirculatory stability (less than 10% deviation from basal values for each measured parameter) than TCI group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Volatile Induction and Maintenance Anaesthesia  with sevoflurane provides better hemodynamic stability for NYHA II patients with concomitant cardiovascular diseases TCI.

References


  1. Azbarov N, Burov N, Kornienco AN. Genesis of cardiorespiratory dysfunction at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 12th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists, Canada, 2000. Book of Abstracts, str. 40. Apstract No P2. 1. 13.

  2. Barkun JS, Caro JJ, Barkun AN et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic and mini-cholecystectomy in a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1221-4.

  3. Sudheer PS, Logan SW, Ateleanu B, Hall JE. Haemodynamic effects of the prone position: a comparison of propofol total intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2006; 61(2): 138-41.

  4. Stosic B, Stojanovic M, Jankovic R, Radojkovic M, Ignjatovic N. Implications of anesthetic techniques on patients’ recovery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009; 66: 421-6.

  5. Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, et al. Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 466-76.

  6. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 322-33.

  7. Bickel A, Loberant N, Bersudsky M, Goldfeld M, Ivry S, Herskovits M, et al. Overcoming reduced hepatic and renal perfusion caused by positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Arch Surg 2007; 142(2): 119-24; discussion 125.

  8. Albertin A, Casati A, Federica L, Roberto V, Travaglini V, Bergonzi P, et al. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during bispectral index guided propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 125-30.

  9. Zhou WM. Effect of different concentration of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia on hemodynamic. Chinese J Mod Drug Appl 2013; 7: 375-8.

  10. Watanabe K, Kashiwagi K, Kamiyama T, Yamamoto M, Fukunaga M, Inada E, et al. High-dose remifentanil suppresses stress response associated with pneumoperitoneum durin laparascopic colectomy. J Anesth 2014; 28: 334-40.

  11. Yufune S, Takamatsu I, Masui K, Kazama T. Effect of remifentanil on plasma propofol concentration and bispectral index during propofol anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 208-14.

  12. Gotoda T, Okada H, Hori K, Kawahara Y, Iwamuro M, Abe M, et al. Propofol sedation with a target-controlled infusion pump and bispectral index monitoring system in elderly patients during a complex upper endoscopy procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 756-64.

  13. Kanaya N, Satoh H, Seki S, Nakayama M, Namiki A. Propofol anesthesia enhances the pressor response to intravenous ephedrine. Anesth Analg 2002; 94(5): 1207-11, table of contents.

  14. Atallah MM, Othman MM. Robotic laparoscopic radical cystectomy inhalational versus total intravenous anesthesia: a pilot study. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2009; 20(2): 257-63.

  15. Watson KR, Shah MV. Clinical comparison of 'single agent' anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus target controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85(4): 541-6.

  16. El-Orbany MI, Wafai Y, Joseph NJ, Salem MR. Tracheal intubation conditions and cardiovascular effects after modified rapid-sequence induction with sevoflurane-rapacuronium versus propofol-rapacuronium. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14(2): 115-20.

  17. Deng X, Zhu T. Clinical comparison of propofol-remifentanil TCI with sevoflurane induction/maintenance anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30:1017-21.

  18. Ozkose Z, Ercan B, Unal Y, Yardim S, Kaymaz M, Dogulu F, et al. Inhalation versus total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of hemodynamic effects, recovery characteristics, and cost. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001; 13(4): 296-302.

  19. Matute E, Alsina E, Roses R, Blanc G, Pérez-Hernández C, Gilsanz F. An inhalation bolus of sevoflurane versus an intravenous bolus of remifentanil for controlling hemodynamic responses to surgical stress during major surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2002; 94(5): 1217-22, table of contents.

  20. Husedzinović I, Tonković D, Barisin S, Bradić N, Gasparović S. Hemodynamic differences in sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia. Coll Antropol 2003; 27(1): 205-12.

Published
2025/12/09
Issue
Vol. 40 No. 1 (2023): Acta facultatis medicae Naissensis
Section
Originalni rad / Original article