Zaštitini faktori ličnosti za stres kod starih tokom pandemije COVID-19: studija preseka

  • Tatjana Kilibarda Akademija vaspitačko-medicinskih strukovnih studija Kruševac – Odsek Ćuprija
  • Šćepan Sinanović Visoka medicinska škola strukovnih studija "Milutin Milanković" u Beogradu
  • Saša Bubanj Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja, Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš,
  • Sanja Trgovčević Akademija vaspitačko-medicinske strukovnih studija Kruševac - odsek Ćuprija
  • Sunčica Ivanović Akademija vaspitačko-medicinske strukovnih studija Kruševac - odsek Ćuprija
  • Suzana Milutinović Akademija vaspitačko-medicinske strukovnih studija Kruševac - odsek Ćuprija
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/afmnai39-35292
Ključne reči: COVID-19, stres i protektivni faktori ličnosti za zdravlje

Sažetak


Uvod/Cilj. Jedna od protivepidemijskih mera u pandemiji COVID-19 u Srbiji 2020.godine je bila obavezna potpuna zabrana kretanja za stare preko 65 godina. Prepoznata su dva glavna stresogena činioca koja su delovala na njihovo zdravlje: intenzivno izveštavanje sredstava javnog informisanja o novoj bolesti i potpuna fizička, pa i socijalna izolacija starih. Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da proceni neposredni uticaj tih anti-epidemijskih mera za suzbijanje COVID-19 epidemije u Srbiji na zdravlje ljudi straijih od 65 godina, kao i da se prepoznaju zaštitini faktori za zdravlje u uslovima obavezne izolacije.

Metod: Studija preseka je sprovedena na 20‰ uzorku građana starijih od 65 godina (ukupno njih 184) urbanog dela grada Kruševca, u centralnom delu Srbije, tokom aprila i maja 2020. godine.

Rezultati: Protivepidemijske mere za suzbijanje COVID-19 epidemije su bile povezane sa pogoršanjem zdravlja kod značajno velikog udela starih osoba u uzorku (oko 84%), kao što su: bezrazložni umor, napetost, otežano obavljanje rutinskih aktivnosti zbog nekretanja, briga, poremećaj spavanja i hipertenzivne krize. Pol, više obrazovanje i materijalni status nisu bili povezani sa zaštitinim faktorima za zdravlje i emocionalnu dobrobit, ali su neki faktori ličnosti u vezi sa otpornošću na stress.

Zaključci: Protektivni faktori ličnosti za zdravlje su okrenutost ispitanika nadi, svrsi života, veri, optimizmu, interesovanju, kao i visoko vrednovanje i prisustvo razvijenog emocionalnog života i prisutvo pozitivnih emocija u životu ispitanika (ljubav, radost, entuzijazam, osećanje bliskosti i pripadanja).

Reference


  1. Brondolo E, Byer K, Gianaros JP, Liu C, Prather AA, Thomas K, Woods-Giscombe LC et al. Stress and health disparities: Contexts, mechanisms, and interventions among racial/ethnic minority and low-socioeconomic status populations. American Psychological Association, Rights and Permissions, Washington: 2017 Available at: https://www.apa.org/pi/health-disparities/resources/stress-report.pdf

  2. Hofmann W, Schmeichel BJ and Baddeley AD. Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 2012; 16: [about 7 p.]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006

  3. Gianaros PJ and Wager TD. Brain-body pathways linking psychological stress and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science; 2015; 24 [about 7 p.]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415581476

  4. Johnsen BH, Eid J, Laberg JC and Thayer JF. The effect of sensitization and coping style on post-traumatic stress symptoms and quality of life: Two longitudinal studies. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2002; 43 (2): 181–188. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/50651593/The_effect_of_sensitization_and_coping_s20161130-18189-1qudcoq-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1638896809&Signature=VXwGCQPU7gchQoT2cXgguZKf6hPZbpB5MDpIfoK6qEC9n3FPz4UrBlN9dH0~4n2CMnJ7OwV4~VPXCj7PDMF9hKw5ygOgOr~XKebU-b~ajqrBjlsBol3jhP-zc0~oQ2TZDydjijb~gXruM8Zgar7HSaEhLu5niJXVQ2tFyKD0XaP5aWghnyXJWfIBZaR2EdizJgDNjMKGedNvyUB0h1VMyFXGO8hJk55zoLnw6iBvl5DBeozhRphlqyjvEpDczAfB3Ar1VjzibcH-tv~m1xrfn-9zQwAjuI1g9zU-PDWCl2OMYYwVgIdsgpdx~WvpXItmCrBVROMLod0Bn6wGXdp--w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

  5. Leger K, Charles S, Turiano N and Almeida D. Personality and Stressor-Related Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2016; 111 (6): 917–928. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956603/

  6. Berger J and Kostić P. Bazični oslonci ličnosti i psihološki potporni sistem (Basic supports of personality and psychological support system). Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju; 2002. (Serbian)

  7. Weiss DS. The Impact of Event Scale – Revised (IES-R). In J.P. Wilson, & C.S. Tang (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Assessing of Psychological Trauma and PTSD. International and Cultural Psychology Series. Boston, MA: Springer; 2007: 219-238. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-70990-1_10

  8. Courtin E and Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health and Social Care in the Community 2017; 25 (3): 799–812. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hsc.12311

  9. Banerjee D and Rai M. Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2020: [about 4 p.]. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0020764020922269

  10. Santini ZI, Jose PE, York Cornwell E, Koyanagi A, Nielsen L, Hinrichsen C, et al. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis. Lancet Pub. Health 2020; 5: [about 9 p.]. Available at: https://findresearcher.sdu.dk:8443/ws/portalfiles/portal/169025097/PIIS2468266719302300.pdf

  11. Armitage R and Nellums LB. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. Lancet Public Health; 2020; 5: [about 3 p.]. Available at: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(20)30061-X/fulltext.

  12. Zhang Y, Zheng FM. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life among Local Residents in Liaoning Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020; 17: [about 5 p.]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2381

  13. Ahmed MZ, Ahmed O, Aibao Z, Hanbin S, Siyu L, Ahmad A. Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 51: [about 7 p.]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194662/

  14. Islam SMD, Bodrud-Doza M, Khan RM, Haque MA, Mamun MA. Exploring COVID-19 stress and its factors in Bangladesh: A perception-based study. Heliyon 2020; 6 (7): [about 5 p.]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350787/

  15. Milić M. (Čovek u istini – potrebe i emocije) Man in truth – needs and emotions. Beograd: Racio; 2018. (Serbian)

  16. Roh S, Burnette C and Lee YS. Prayer and Faith: Spiritual Coping among American Indian Women Cancer Survivors. Health & Social Work 2018; 43 (3): 185-192. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/hsw/article-abstract/43/3/185/5036077

  17. Solano LPC, Silva AG, Soares IA, Ashmawi HA and Viejra JE. Resilience and hope during advanced disease: a pilot study with metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BMC Palliative Care 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 6] ; 15 (70): [about 4 p.]. Available at: https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-016-0139-y

  18. Johnsen BH, Eid J, Laberg JC and Thayer JF. The effect of sensitization and coping style on post-traumatic stress symptoms and quality of life: Two longitudinal studies. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2002; 43 (2): 181–188. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/50651593/The_effect_of_sensitization_and_coping_s20161130-18189-1qudcoq-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1638898504&Signature=MQn1Tqdvul5Qdom3bTghR8Yj4u~BwGISEvzLe9KBTirIII~1~XBBp5lb3RaMe4is4kYIvnc16n2Rfz5KfE12XK0Gg2xXU7UNrAK44qydAdR5Wvu-S5SopBv6BdIb~I1WZBTC1UDRbeGKyf-aRaL7B1pRd4DaNumfxE-Z6CJDjuzZ4CGJiQp56k6FGpqDEDc5mDUfsI~8wTxSPbMPDq2IEAmRqtUyreetIDVnI2EvLJs5usmmpEwzFp54DKBfoJEQ-Yt~X1ngs-gogD4y0a3aXfGSZYfHitZV1LTKcCcA4mLVgtz0ZOZ6CstoT6-aPX5b6w6XH9iXUvrpxMrWALS0vA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

  19. Liotta G, Marazzi MC, Orlando S, Palombi L. Is social connectedness a risk factors for the spreading of COVID-19 among older adults? The Italian paradox. PLoS ONE 2020; 15(5): e0233329. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233329

  20. Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR. Emotion is for doing: the action tendency component. In: J.J.R. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, C. Soriano, editors. Components of emotional meaning; a sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013; 70–185. Available at: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4316064

  21. Yang X, Garcia KM, Jung Y, Whitlow CT, McRae K and Waugh CE. vmPFC activation during a stressor predicts positive emotions during stress recovery. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2018; 256–268. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/13/3/256/4867907?login=true

  22. Trompetter HR, Kleine E, Bohlmeijer ET. Why does positive mental health buffer against psychopathology? An exploratory study on self-compassion as a resilience mechanism and adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2017; 41: 459-468. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410199/

  23. Braniecka A, Trzebinska E, Dowgiert A, Wytykowska A. Mixed Emotions and Coping: The Benefits of Secondary Emotions. PLoS ONE 2014: [about 4 p.]. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0103940

Objavljeno
2025/12/19
Broj časopisa
Vol. 39 Br. 1 (2022): Acta facultatis medicae Naissensis
Rubrika
Originalni rad / Original article