Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth in clinical practice
Abstract
Introduction Violence risk assessment in adolescents is an emergent research area with great potential for clinical application. The need for standardization of clinical approaches has led to the development of structured professional judgment tools for violence risk assessment in youth. The aim of the study was to present a structured evaluation of violence risk assessment in clinical work with two male patients, ages 12 and 17 with a psychiatric diagnosis of Conduct disorder, socialized type, i.e. Acute psychotic disorder. The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth TM (SAVRY) was used in the assessment to help estimate the patients’ risk for future violence. Discussion Based on the systematic analysis and consideration of the SAVRY Historical, Socio-Contextual and Individual risk factors balanced against the Protective factors, both patients were rated as being at High risk for future violence. In order to control and reduce the risk of further violent behaviour, an intervention plan was designed. Conclusion With the increasing recognition of the public health importance of violence, the violence risk assessment is the subject of considerable clinical and research interest. In this way, we are joining the global trend of opposing the social pathological emergence of violence among youth and violence in general.
References
Borum R, Bartel P, Forth A. Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), Version 1.1. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 2003.
Borum R, Lodewijks H, Bartel P, Forth A. Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. In Otto RK, Douglas KS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assess-ment. New York: Routledge, 2010. p. 63-80.
Bushman BJ, Huesmann LR. Aggression. In Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. p. 833-63. [CrossRef]
DeLisi M, Piquero AR, Cardwell SM. The unpredict-ability of murder: Juvenile homicide in the pathways to desistance study. Youth Violence Juv Justice 2016; 14(1):26-42. [CrossRef]
Dubow EF, Huesmann LR, Boxer P, Smith C. Child-hood and adolescent risk and protective factors for violence in adulthood. J Crim Justice 2016;45:26-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kenan K, Loeber R, Zhang Q, Stouthamer-Loeber M. The influence of deviant peers on the development of boys disruptive and delinquent behavior: a temporal analysis. Dev Psychopathol 1995;7(4):715-26.[CrossRef]
Monahan J. The clinical prediction of violent behavior. (DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-92). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1981.
Murray J, Farrington DP. Risk factors for conduct dis-order and delinquency: key findings from longitudinal studies. Can J Psychiatry 2010;55(10):633-42.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sariason A, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, Fazel S. Trig-gers for violent criminality in patients with psychotic disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 2016;73(8):796-803. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Silverstein SM, Del Pozzo J, Roché M., Boyle D, Miskimen T. Schizophrenia and violence: Realities and recommendations. Crime Psychol Rev 2015;1(1):21-42. [CrossRef]
Vincent GM. Psychopathy and violence risk assess-ment in youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2006;15:407-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]