Pharmacoeconomic implications generated by primary open-angle glaucoma on workers

  • Zoran Velkovski Clinical Hospital Bitola, Department of laboratory diagnostics
  • Maja Belevska Clinical Hospital Bitola, Department of Ophthalmology
  • Gjosevska Faculty of medicine Skopje, Clinic for eye diseases
Keywords: primary glaucoma, pharmacoeconomic implications, treatment, costs, productivity losses

Abstract


Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy which due to the irreversible loss of visual acuity, the direct and consequential costs associated with the treatment and the indirect losses because of the reduced productivity generates social and pharmacoeconomic burdens. The study is designed to assess pharmacoeconomic implications generated by primary open-angle glaucoma on workers. It is a cross sectional study, which includes 190 male and female respondents with primary glaucoma, aged 28-67, with visual acuity >6/18 (0,33), according to the ICD-10 classification, conducted in the period August-November 2020 in North Macedonia. 34,21% of the respondents received low income, 40,53% average and 25,26%, high income. Pharmacological costs for treatment of binocular glaucoma amount to 24,1-45,4 Euros per month, which account for 10,26-19,32% of the respondents’ low income and <4,82-9,08% of the respondents’ high income. In 21,05% the economic burden resulted in existential crisis for the family and 25,79% of the respondents were treated inadequately with generic alternative medicine or inadequate doses of medication due to financial reasons. Loss of productivity was registered in 25,79% of the respondents, while 21,58% of whom, due to their inability to carry out the essential work duties, received lower monthly income. Glaucoma generates a huge pharmacoeconomic burden, which is a consequence of direct and other medical costs for treatment and indirect losses from productivity, which requires the use of screening programs for timely diagnosis and adequate regular treatment, which will help maintain visual acuity and work ability, thus reducing the pharmacoeconomic burden.

References

Babić N. Medikamentozna terapija glaukoma. Novi Sad (SRB): Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu 2013;5-6.

Babighian S, Caretti L, Tavolato M, Cian R, Galan A. Excimer laser trabeculotomy vs 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. A 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Eye 2010;24 (4):632-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bagnis A, Papadia M, Scotto R, Traverso CE. Current and emerging medical therapies in treatment of glau-coma. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2011;16(2):293-307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bagnis A, Papadia M, Scotto R, Traverso CE. Current and emerging medical therapies in treatment of glau-coma. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2011;16(2):293-307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernández R, Siddiqui MAR, Cook J, Lourenco T, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glau-coma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2007;11(41):1-190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I. Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experi-mental concepts. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012; 40(4):341-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Chen XY, Cai Y. Epidemiology and classification of primary angle-closure glaucoma today Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2011;47(10):949-52. [PubMed]

Cook, C, Foster, P. Epidemiology of glaucoma: what’s new? Can j ophthalmol 2012;47:3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cooney J, Landers G, Rein D, Bae J, Curry R. Com-parative Assessment of Cost and Care Outcomes Among Georgia’s Community-Based and Facility-Based Longterm Care Programs. Atlanta. Georgia State University 2004.

Cvetković D. Oftalmologija, udžbenik za studente medicine. Beograd (SRB): CIBID; 2010.

de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden JC. Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occuop Med 2002;52(4):177-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Feiner L, Piltz-Seymour J. Collaborative initial glau-coma treatment study: a summary of results to date. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003;14:106-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Flammer J. Glaucoma. 2nd ed. Toronto (CA): 2003.

FZO/RSM, Skopje, 2020.

Gabriel Lazcano-Gomez, de los Angeles M, Cadena R, Torres-Tamayo M, Hernandez de Oteyza A, Turati-Acosta M, Jimenez-Román J. Cost of glaucoma treat-ment in a developing country over a 5-year period. Medicine 2016;95:47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Geimer SA. Glaucoma diagnostics. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91(1):1-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Grekova DD, Andreevska KG, Petrova G, Petkova V. Assessment of the social and economic burden of glaucoma in Bulgaria 2018. [CrossRef]

Hirsch JD. Considerations in the Pharmacoeconomics of Glaucoma. Manag Care 2002;11(11suppl):32-7. [PubMed]

Janev K. Opšta oftalmologija. Skopje: Menora; 2002.

Kang JH, Loomis SJ, Wiggs JL, Willett WC, Pasquale LR. A prospective study of folate, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 intake in relation to exfoliation glaucoma or suspected exfoliation glaucoma. JAMA Ophthal-mology 2014;132(5): 549-59. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lam BL, Zheng DD, Davila EP. Trends in glaucoma medication expenditure: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2001-2006. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129: 1345-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

MF/RSM, Skopje, 2020.

National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, Outpatient Depart-ment File. 2006. [PubMed]

Nayak B, Gupta S, Kumar G. Socioeconomics of long-term glaucoma therapy in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:20-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Omoti AE, Edema OT, Akpe BA, Musa P. Cost analysis of medical versus surgical management of glaucoma in Nigeria. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2010;5(4):232-9. [PubMed]

PIOM/RSM, Skopje, 2020.

Poulsen PB, Buchholz P, Walt JG, Christensen TL, Thygesen J. Cost analysis of glaucoma-related-blind-ness in Europe. 2005. [CrossRef]

Prum BE, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Moroi SE, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glau-coma Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. Ophthal-mology 2016;123(1):41-111. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rachmiel R, Trope GE, Chipman ML, Gouws P, Buys YM. Effect of medical therapy on glaucoma filtration surgery rates in Ontario. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124(10):1472–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rahman MQ, Beard SM, Discombe R, Sharma R, Montgomery DM. Direct healthcare costs of glaucoma treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97(6):720-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1754-60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preva-lence by Age, Gender, and Race: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis. IOVS 2006;47:4254-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Sarenac Vulovic T, Janicijevic K. Primary open-angle glaucoma and farmacoeconomics – review. Sanamed 2016;11(3):243-8. [CrossRef]

Schmier JK, Halpern MT, Jones ML. The economic implications of glaucoma: a literature review. Pharma-coeconomics 2007;25(4):287-308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Servat JJ, Bernardino CR. Effects of common topical antiglaucoma medications on the ocular surface, eyelids and periorbital tissue. Drugs Aging 2011; 28(4):267-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Shields MB, Ritch R, Krupin T. Classifications of the glaucomas. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996.

Stein JD, Kim DD, Peck WW, Giannetti SM, Hutton DW. Cost-effectiveness of medications compared with laser trabeculoplasty in patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130(4): 497-505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Traverso CE, Walt JG, Kelly SP. Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(10):1245-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

VanNewkirk MR, Weih L, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL, Keeffe JE, Taylor HR. Visual impairment and eye diseases in elderly institutionalized Australians. Oph-thalmology 2000;107:2203-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Varma R, Lee P, Goldberg I, Kotak S. An Assessment of the Health and Economic Burdens of Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:515-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Vasudevan SK, Gupta V, Crowston JG. Neuro-protection in glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59:102-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

WHO. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000–2011. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2013.

Published
2021/10/18
Section
Original article