WOMEN'S LANGUAGE IN LITERARY DISCOURSE: A REVIEW OF MODALITY ***
Abstract
Various linguistic means characterize women’s language and they were presented to the public in the 70-ies. The first systematic and critical approach to linguistic features of women’s language were presented in a pioneering study by Robin Lakoff in 1975. Ever since, it has been considered as a beginning of a new interdisciplinary field of “gender studies”. Nowadays, women’s language presents an important issue of sociolinguistic studies of language and gender.
This paper analyses the means for expressing modality in women’s language found in literary discourse. The corpora are comprised of seven novels about Harry Potter in English and Serbian alike. According to some theoreticians of language and gender, frequent use of epistemic modality presents a significant trait of women’s linguistic pattern (Coates, 1996, 2003; Мills, 1995; Livia, 2003).
If we assume that attitudes and ideologies could be expressed by linguistic features such as modality, this paper aims to compare the modal forms and their meaning in English and Serbian by using contrastive linguistic analysis, determine the differences in linguistic patterns between the two and attempt to explain possible ideological implications from the CDA perspective.
References
Kоатс 2011: Coats, J. , “Language and Gender : A Reader” , Oxford : Blackwell
Ферклаф 1995: Fairclough Norman, “Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language”, London: Longman
Ферклаф 2003: Fairclough, N., “Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research”, New York : Routledge
Хадлстон и Палам 2002: Huddlestone & Pullum, “The Cambridge Grammar of the English language”, Cambridge University Press
Лејкоф 1975: Lakoff Robin, “Language and woman’s place”, Oxford University Press
Ливиа 2003: Livia, A., “One man in a two is a woman: Linguistic approaches to gender in literary texts” In: M.Mayerhoff & Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing ,142–158
Mајерхоф и Холмс 2003: Mayerhoff М. & Holmes, M. (Eds.), “The handbook of language and gender”, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Милошевић-Трбојевић 2004: Ивана Трбојевић-Милошевић, Modalnost, sud, iskaz. Epistemička modalnost u engleskom i srpskom jeziku, Beograd: Čigoja štampa
Николић и Бабић-Анрић 2019: Николић, Мелина и Бабић-Антић, Јелена, „Друштвене импликације женског језика у медијском дискурсу“ (ур. Урош Шуваковић) Социолошки преглед Vol. LIII, no. 4
Палмер 1979: Palmer, F.R., “Modality and the English Modals”,London: Longman
Портнер 2009: Portner, Paul, “Modality”, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Квирк и др. 1985: Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J., “A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language” , London: Longman
Свон 2016, Swan Michael, “Practical English usage”, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ван Дајк 1993: Van Dijk, T.A., “Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and society”, Vol. 4, 249─283