HYPOTHESES IN HISTORICAL RESEARCH

  • Dragan Lj. Tancic
  • Dalibor M. Elezović
Keywords: history, historical phenomena, scientific and historical research, hypotheses.

Abstract


In all sciences, there is a general agreement that hypotheses can be defined under the rules of scientific defining. Consequently, with most authors in different sciences and scientific disciplines, it is indisputable that there is a general agreement of different theoretical and methodological directions that hypotheses are based on assumptions about the phenomenon, problem, and subject of research, which are expressed in the form of attitudes and judgments and have some cognitive value, in all sciences as well as in historical research. Hypotheses are determined by the definition of the problem, the subject of the research, and the goals of the research, primarily scientific ones. Hypotheses in all sciences, even historical ones, consist of variables and attitudes of a hypothesis that expresses the relations between variables. It is necessary to distinguish hypotheses in the process of acquiring scientific knowledge and in scientific research projects.

References

Ajdačić 1990: Vladimir Ajdačić, Science as a fairy tale, Gornji Milanovac, Dečije novine.

Бориснёв 2010: Сергей Бориснёв. „Современные проблемы теории и методологии исторического исследования“, Армия и общество, (3), 81–87.

Fitzgerald & Fox 2001: Jack D. Fitzgerald & Steven M. Fox. Research Methodology in Criminological Sciences. Sarajevo: Faculty of Criminological Sciences.

Gilli 1974: Gian Antonio Gilli. How to research. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Glass & Hall 2008: David Glass. Ned Hall. „A Brief History of the Hipothesis“. Cell, Vol. 134, (3), 378-381. doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033

Gud & Het 1966: Viliam Gud, Pol Het. Methods of social research. Belgrade: Vuk Karadzic.

Jordan 2009: Stefan Jordan. Theorien und Methoden der Geschichtswissenschaft. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

Knoepfel, Larrue, Varone, Hill 2011. Peter Knoepfel, Corinne Larrue, Frederic Varone, Michael Hill, „Research and working hipotheses“. Public Policy analysis, 251-270. DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781861349071.003.0011

Kuba & Koking 2003: Li Kuba. Džon Koking. Methodology of making a scientific text. Podgorica: Cid.

Milosavljević 1980: Slavomir Milosavljević. The study of political phenomena. Belgrade: Institute for Political Studies, Faculty of Political Science.

Milosavljević & Radosavljevic 2000: Slavomir Milosavljević & Ivan Radosavljevic. Fundamentals of the methodology of Political Sciences. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik.

Pečujlić 1976: Miroslav Pečujlić. Introduction to Sociological theories- Proceedings, Fundamentals of social science, IV edition. Belgrade: Službeni list.

Poincare 1917: Henri Poincare. Science et hypothese. Paris: Flammarion.

Šešić 1980: Bogdan Šešić. Basics of the methodology of social sciences. Belgrade: Naučna knjiga.

Шибаршина 2011: Светлана Шибаршина. „Гипотеза в социально-гуманитарных науках“, Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки, књ. 2, (22), 124-130.

Tančić 2009: Dragan Tančić, The historical method in the research of political phenomena, doctoral dissertation defended at the Faculty of Political Sciences in Belgrade, University of Belgrade.

Zaječaranović 1977: Grigorije Zaječaranović. Fundamentals of the methodology of science. Belgrade: Naučna knjiga.

Županov 1962: Josip Županov. Indicators; in the collection Methodology of Research in Social Sciences. Belgrade: Institute for Criminological Research.
Published
2021/04/28
Section
Članci