THE READER AND THE NARRATIVE METALEPSIS IN THE NOVEL THE ATTIC BY DANILO KIŠ

  • Mirjana Bečejski Institute for Serbian Culture - Priština/Leposavić
Keywords: Key words: Kiš, reading, I narrator, multiplication of I identity, transgression of narrative levels, trompe-l’œil, narrative metalepsis, life and literature, narrative worlds, good reader.

Abstract


As a writer who read and followed the contemporary literature and literary theory in several different languages and who intensively contemplated the act of reading and thematised it in his belletristic prose, Kiš had already problematised in his novel The Attic the most important aspects of reading, brought to light and actualised by the classical literature and placed at the centre of research by the post-classical theory of narration: the first person narration and the problem of identity of the author’s I, the use of the trompe-l’œil technique, transgression of the narrative levels/narrative worlds and narrative metalepsis, the boundary between life and literature etc. The author of this paper focuses its research on the reader and the narrative metalepsis in Danilo Kiš’s first romanesque novel. The first part is dedicated to the definitions of narrative metalepsis in the contemporary theoretical studies (from Gérard Genette to John Pier), the second one to the types of metalepsis in The Attic, and the third one to the Kiš’s implicit concept of the good (informed, educated, empathic, immersed ) reader: the reader of The Attic and the reader in The Attic, the problem of duality, that is, the multiplication of identity of the author’s I and the relation between life and literature, which is an obsessive question of Kiš’s poetics. The article “The Reader with a Lamp at the Crossroads” (Kiš’s concepts of the reader and Kiš as a reader), which the author of the paper published in the previous edition of the journal Baština, deals with the status and types of readers in the poetics of Danilo Kiš, therefore, this paper represents a continuation and intensification of the research in that direction.

 

References

ИЗВОР И ЛИТЕРАТУРА


 


Kiš Danilo. Sabrana dela Danila Kiša: u redakciji Mirjane Miočinović. Beograd: Prosveta 2006–2007:


Ma Mansarda,


ČA – Čas anatomije,


HP Homo poeticus,


ŽL Život, literaturа,


Sk Skladište,


GTIGorki talog iskustva.


АУТОР 2020: АУТОР. Нулта дисциплина Данила Киша. Лепосавић: Институт за српску културу Приштина – Лепосавић.


АУТОР 2021: АУТОР. „Читалац ’с лампом на раскршћу’ (Кишови концепти читаоца и Киш као читалац).“ Баштина, бр. 55, 31–42.


Bogosavljević 1999: Srdan Bogosavljević. „Batos.“ U: Godišnjak za poetička i hermeneutička pitanja: PH3. Ur. Dragan Stojanović. Beograd: Junior, 10–24.


Бојанић Ћирковић 2020: Мирјана Бојанић Ћирковић. Читалац у науци о књижевности: од антике до савремених теорија читања. Ниш: Филозофски факултет.


Borhes 1990: Horhe Luis Borhes. Predgovori. Prevod i predgovor Silvija Monros Stojaković. Beograd: Stilos.


Genette 2006: Gérard Genette. Metalepsa: Od figure do fikcije. Prevela Ivana Franić. Zagreb: Disput.


Делић 1997: Јован Делић. Кроз прозу Данила Киша. Ка поетици Кишове прозе II. Београд: Београдски издавачко-графички завод.


Zec 2015: Safet Zec. Prozori (slike): https://www.google.rs/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Safet+Zec%2C+prozori, приступљено 4. 12. 2015.


Cohn 2012: Dorrit Cohn. “Metalepsis and Mise en Abyme.” Narrative 20. 1, 105–114.


Kuvač Levačić 2014: Kornelija Kuvač Levačić. „Metalepsa i poigravanje funkcijama književnog teksta u humoreskama Bratoljuba Klaića.“ Rasprave: Časopis instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 40/2, 551–567.


Lotman 1976: Јurij Mihajlovič Лотман. Struktura umetničkog teksta. Prevod i predgovor Novica Petković. Beograd: Nolit.


Malina 2002: Debra Malina. Breaking the Frame: Metalepsis and the Construction of the Subject. Columbus: Ohio State UP.


McHale 2004: Brian McHale. Postmodernist Fiction. London and New York: Routledge.


Milosavljević Milić 2016: Snežana Milosavljević Milić. Virtuelni narativ: Ogledi iz kognitivne naratologije. Niš: Filozofski fakultet – Sremski Karlovci/ Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.


Oraić Tolić 1990: Dubravka Oraić Tolić. Teorija citatnosti. Zagreb: Grafički zavod Hrvatske.


Pier 2005: John Pier. “Metalepsis.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. by David Herman, Manfred Jahn and Marie-Laure Ryan. London and New York: Routledge, 303–304.


Pier 2011: John Pier. “Metalepsis (revised version).” The Living Handbook of Naratology. (https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/51.html, pristupljeno 15. 7. 2021).


Prins 2011: Džerald Prins. Naratološki rečnik. Prevela Brana Miladinov. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.


Ryan 2001: Marie-Laure Ryan. Narrative as Virtual Reality, Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. The Jones Hopkins University Press. Baltimore and London.


Sartr 1991: Žan Pol Sartr. „Za koga se piše.“ Prevela Frida Filipović. U hrestomatiji: Teorijska misao o književnosti. Priredio Petar Milosavljević. Novi Sad: Svetovi 1991, 567–573.


Saint-Gelais 2005: Richard Sant-Gelais. „Transfictionality.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. by David Herman, Manfred Jahn and Marie-Laure Ryan. London and New York: Routledge, 212–213.


Fludernik 2003: Monika Fludernik. „Metanarrative and Metafiction Commentary: from Metadiscursivе to Metanarrative and Metafiction.” Poetica 35 (2003), 1–39.


Foley 1999: Barbara Foley. „Dokumentarni roman i problem granica.“ Književna revija, 39/1–2, 172–182.

Published
2022/02/25
Section
Članci