COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN THE EDUCATION OF DEAF AND DEAF STUDENTS
Abstract
The paper presents research findings that emphasize the importance of collaborative learning as an effective approach to learning for deaf and hard of hearing students, as opposed to traditional. This educational approach illustrates how shared learning experiences can promote socialization and interaction, and facilitate learning and contribute to the quality of knowledge. Thus, collaborative learning is a modern strategy that contributes to alleviating the lack of traditional teaching in different types of the school environment. This research aims to experimentally determine the effects of cooperative learning in relation to traditional learning about the permanence of knowledge of deaf and hard of hearing students. The study sample consisted of 49 deaf and hard of hearing students aged 12 to 15 years. Specially designed knowledge tests for this research were used for data collection. The results showed that there is a statistically significant difference in the durability of knowledge of deaf and hard of hearing students acquired afterthe conducted experimental program, and the retest was conducted after six months.
References
Abrami–Poulsen et al. 2004: Abrami, Philip C., Poulsen, Catherine, Chambers, Bette. Teacher motivatiom to implement educational innovation: factor differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2) 201-216. doi: 1080/0144341032000160146
Avcıoğlu 2007: Avcıoğlu, Hasan. (2007). Sosyal becerileri değerlendirme ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (4‐6 Yaş), AİBÜ, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2)87‐101
Antić, 2010: Antić Slobodanka. Modeli kooperativnog učenja, potencijali, ograničenja, Institut za psihologiju, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet
Abrami–Poulsen et al. 2004: Abrami, Philip C., Poulsen, Catherine, Chambers, Bette. Teacher motivatiom to implement educational innovation: factor differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2) 201-216. doi: 1080/0144341032000160146
Bilesanmi-Awoderu– Bukunola et al. Bilesanmi-Awoderu Jumoke Bukunola,Oludipe Daniel Idowu (2012). Effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies on Nigerian junior secondary students’ academic achievement in Basic Science. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 2(3)307-325. doi: 10.9734/bjesbs/2012/1628
Bucalos 2005: Bucalos Anne B., & Lingo, Amy S. Filling the potholes in the road to inclusion: Successful research-based strategies for intermediate and middle school students with mild disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 1(4).
Felder–Brent 2007: Felder Richard M., Brent Rebecca, Cooperative Learning, P.A. Mabrouk, ed., Active Learning: Models from the Analytical Sciences, ACS Symposium Series 970, Chapter 4. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society
Hannessy – Evans, 2006: Hennessy David, Evans Ruby, Small-group learning in the community college classroom. Community College Enterprise, 12(1)93-110. Retrieved from https://www.schoolcraft.edu/pdfs/cce/12.1.93-110.pdf
Ilić–Rešić 2017: Ilić Desa, Rešić Sead, Methods of Cooperative Learning and Their Aplicationthe Development of Comtetitive Themes in Teachig Mathematics, HUMAN Research in Rehabilitation 7(2)118-128.
Ivić–Pešikan i dr. 2001:Ivić Ivan, Pešikan Ana i Antić Slobodanka, Aktivno učenje 2,Beograd
Jensen 2003. Jensen Eric, Super-nastava. Zagreb: Educa
Johnson D.W. – Johnson R.T 1990: Johnson David W., Johnson,Roger T. What is cooperative learning, In Brubacher M., Payne R. & Rickett, K.(eds): Perspectives on small group learning, Rubicon Publishing Inc.(61-81).
Johnson, D.W.–Johnson, R. T. 2008:Johnson David W., Johnson,Roger T.Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher's role. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman & J. Terwel (Ed), Teacher's Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom (pp. 9-37). New York, U.S.A: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1
Johnson D.W. – Johnson R.T et al. 1993:Johnson David W., Johnson Roger T., Holubec, Edythe Johnson, Circles of learning: cooperation in theclassroom.Edina: Interaction Book Company.Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED241516.pdf
Kadum–Bošnjak 2012: Kadum-Bošnjak, S.Collaborative learning. Methodical tours,19(1)181-19). UDK 371.331.4
Kovačević 2007: Kovačević Jasmina, Nastavni efekti kooperativnog učenja u nastavi učenika oštećenog sluha, Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 3-4, 129-147.
Kovács – Bagány 2016: Kovács, E., Bagány, Á. (2016). Alternatív pedagógiai lehetőségek a hátrányos helyzetű tanulók oktatásában [Alternative pedagogical solutions in the education of disadvantaged pupils], Tanulmánygyűjtemény, Újvidéki Egyetem Magyar Tannyelvű Tanítóképző Kar, Szabadka, 286-294.
Long – Beil 2005: Long, Gary, Donald Beil, The Importance of Direct Communication During Continuing Education Workshops for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing - Professionals. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 18(1), 5-11.
Marchetti–Foster, et al. 2012: Marchetti, Carol, Foster Susan, Long Gary, Stinson Michael, Crossing the Communication Barrier: Facilitating Communication in Mixed Groups of Deaf and Hearing Students, Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(1)51 – 63
Miščević-Kadijević 2009: Miščević-Kadijević Gordana, Kooperativni pristup u nastavi i trajnost učeničkih znanja.Nastava i vaspitanje, 58(4),499-508
Radoman 1994: Radoman Vesna, Surdopsihologija, Defektološki fakultet
Роксандић 2013: Роксандић Ивана, Функција кооперативног учења у настави глувих инаглувих ученика (Магистарска теза). Универзитет у Београду –Факултет за специјалну едукацију и рехабилитацију
Роксандић– Ковачевић 2014: Роксандић Ивана, Ковачевић Јасмина, Нове тенденције у организацији наставног рада у школама за глуве и наглуве ученике. Специфичност оштећења слуха. Тематски зборник радова. Београд: Универзитет у Београду, Факултет за специјалну едукацију и рехабилитацију, Издавачки центар факултета
Sari – Pürsün, 2018: Sari Hakan, Pürsün Tuğba, Examininig How Effective Teaching Methods and Tehniques and Materials are Used in Math Teaching For Hearing Imparied Students: from Turkish Teachers’ Perspectives. .European Journal of Special Education Research. 3 (4)1-18. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1288867
Schmuck – Schmuck 1997: Schmuck, Richard A.; Schmuck, Patricia A. Group Processes in the Classroom (7& ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.
Slavin 2011: Slavin, Robert E. (2011). Instuction Based on Cooperative Learning. In R.E.Mayer & P.A. Alexander (Eds). Handbook on Research of Learning and Instruction. New York Taylor&Fancis. (323).
Slavin 1978: Slavin, Robert E, Student teams and comparison among equals: Effects on academic performance and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4)532–538.https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-0663.70.4.532
Stevens–Slavin 1995: Stevens, Robert. J., Slavin, Robert E. The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students’ Achievement, Attitudes, and Social Relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (2) 321‒351.
Slavin, 2014: Slavin, Robert E. Making Cooperative Learning Powerful. Educational Leadership, 72 (2) 22‒26.
Славнић 1996: Славнић Светлана, Формирање говора код мале глуве деце, Београд, ДДЈ
Webb –Mastergeorge, 2003: Webb Noreen M., Mastergeorge Ann, Promoting effective helping in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73-97.
Ćatić – Sarvan, 2008: Ćatić Refik, Sarvan Almira, Kooperativno učenje u nastavi prirode i društva, Zbornik radova (11-43). Pedagoški fakultet u Zenici
Džaferagić-Franca–Tomić 2012: Džaferagić-Franca Azra, Tomić, Ruža, Kooperativno učenje u nastavi mlađih razreda osnovne škole. Metodički obzori, 7(2012)2 (15), (pp. 107-17). Retrived from https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=124606