PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATIONAL ORDERS IN THE REPUBLIC SERBIA – METHODOLOGICAL AND CRIMINAL LAW APPROACH
Abstract
In the paper, the authors dealt with the problems of the application of educational orders in the Republic of Serbia from a methodological and criminal law approach. Educational orders, as sui generis measures, can be applied both before the initiation of criminal proceedings and during the duration of the criminal proceedings, with the focus of this paper being on their application before the initiation of criminal proceedings. The legislative national framework of the Republic of Serbia regarding the application of educational orders is based on the Law on Juvenile Offenders and the Criminal Protection of Juveniles (ZM) from 2005, with the authors taking into account the changes mentioned in the Draft ZM. Two hypotheses are defined in the paper. The first hypothesis is that educational orders as diversionary models of treatment of juvenile offenders and non-penal measures are relatively recent in the Republic of Serbia. Therefore, the mentioned measures cannot be nor are they sufficiently developed, which leads to incomplete satisfaction of restorative justice towards minors and injured parties, when the law allows us to do so. The second hypothesis is that organizational factors are of special importance for the success of the implementation of educational orders. In the paper, the authors point out that the new proposal of the Law on Juvenile Offenders and Criminal Protection of Minors enriches the system of educational orders and significantly expands the scope of their application. A certain significant rate of recidivism could be avoided by the combined and balanced application of repressive measures and educational orders as a sui generis measure. The paper gives de lege ferenda recommendations in the direction of simplifying the procedure that follows the beginning of the application of educational orders from the time when a criminal offense is committed, with the fact that the types of educational orders must necessarily follow the state and trend of juvenile crime.
References
Алексић, Живојин. (1994). Малолетничка криминалистика. Анали Правног факултета у Београду, 1-2, 7-17.
Божић Ванда, Драган Танчић (2022). Кривичноправни и политиколошки аспекти заштите тајних података и докумената, Институт за српску културу, Приштина-Лепосавић.
Božić Vanda (2017). Kaznenopravni aspekti prijevara i zlouporaba u osiguranju kao oblik neznatnog i organiziranog kriminaliteta. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta, Univerziteta u Podgorici, god. 43, br. 43, str. 300-320.
Божић, Ванда. (2016). Сузбијање организираног криминалитета у свјетлу позитивног казненог законодавства Републике Хрватске, Зборник радова Сузбијање организованог криминала као предуслов владавине права, Институт за упоредно право, Београд, стр. 285-299.
Божић, Ванда. (2019). Казненоправне санкције у законодавству Републике Хрватске – критички осврт и анализа стања уз приједлоге de lege ferenda. Зборник радова Удружења за међународно кривично право, Тара, 05, 319-334.
Божић, Ванда. (2019). Казна затвора у казненом законодавству Хрватске и Србије – осврт на поједина законска рјешења уз приједлоге de lege ferenda. Collection of papers „The Role of Law in Social Development“, Faculty of Law Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Tom II, 2019, 91-106.
Божић, Ванда. (2021). Prison sentences in the Republic of Serbia with an analysis of court practice, Proceedings of the eighth International Scientific Conference Social changes in the global world, University in Shtip, Faculty of Law, Republic of North Macedonia, Tom 1, doi.org/10.46763/SCGW211035b, 35-50
Božić, Vanda. (2021). Cyber kriminalitet s osvrtom na pandemiju COVID-19, Zbornik radova COVID – 19 – izazovi i posljedice, TOM I, Evropski Univerzitet Brčko Distrikt i Evropski Univerzitet Kallos Tuzla, 155-170.
Božić, Vanda, Bataveljić, Dragan. (2021). Zaštita ljudskih prava u doba pandemije COVID-19, Zbornik radova Pravo i društvo u uslovima pandemije, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe, Univerzitet Privredna akademija, Novi Sad, str. 186-198.
Deborah, Levine. (2007). A ‘Pharming’: the abuse of prescription and over-the-counter drugs in teens. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 19, no. 3, 270-274.
Handbook on Restorative justice programmes. (2006). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: Vienna.
Juvenile Justice, Innocenti digest. (1997). UNICEF.
Knežević, Saša. (2008). Diskreciono krivično gonjenje maloletnih delikvenata. Pristup pravosuđu – instrumenti za implementaciju evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Republike Srbije, Tematski zbornik radova, knjiga br. 4, Niš, str. 373-388.
Кнежевић, С. (2008). Васпитни налози као вид диверзионог реаговања на малолетничку делинквенцију, Бања Лука: Удружење правника Републике Српске.
Knežević, Saša. (2010). Maloletničko krivično pravo- materijalno, procesno i izvršno-. Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu: Niš.
Lockwood, Ashley, Viglione, Jill & Peck, H. Jennifer. (2021). Covid-19 and Juvenile Probation: A Qualitative Examination of Emergent Challenges and Useful Strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. XX, no. X, 1-20.
Perić, Obrad. (1994). Decenija velikih promena u krivičnopravnom statusu maloletnika. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 1-2, 172-185.
Podrška reformi maloletničkog pravosuđa: Unapređenje primene vaspitnih naloga. (2012). Beograd: Republički zavod za socijalnu zaštitu.
Radulović, Ljiljana. (2010). Funkcija obrazovanja u suzbijanju maloletničkog kriminaliteta. Strani pravni život, 1, 145-168.
Reimagining a new social our futures contract for together education. (2021). Paris: UNESCO.
Satarić, Nadežda & Obradović, Dragan. (2011). Analiza praksi primene vaspitnih naloga i posebnih obaveza u Srbiji. Beograd: Amity, International Management Group.
Steinberg, Laurence. (2009). Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459-485.
Stepanović, Saša. (2020). Uticaj pandemije virusa korona na obrazovanje. Nastava i vaspitanje, 69 (2), 183-196.
Suranto, Aw, Pratiwi, W. Widiarti, Setiawan, Benni & Normah, Mustaffa. (2020). Parenting and sharenting communication for preventing juvenile delinquency. Informasi, vol. 50, no. 2, 177-186.
Vlaović-Vasiljević, Dragica, Džamonja-Ignjatović, Tamara, Marković, Ljubinka & Sofrenović, Vera. (2012). Standardi i procedure za primenu vaspitnih naloga. Maloletničko pravosuđe u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova sa Druge godišnje konferencije Saveta za praćenje i unapređenje rada organa krivičnog postupka i izvršenja krivičnih sankcija prema maloletnicima. Beograd: Centar za prava deteta, 145-154.
Vučković-Janković, Jelica. (2012). Primena vaspitnih naloga u tužilačkoj praksi. Maloletničko pravosuđe u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova sa Druge godišnje konferencije Saveta za praćenje i unapređenje rada organa krivičnog postupka i izvršenja krivičnih sankcija prema maloletnicima. Beograd: Centar za prava deteta, 155-160.
Convention on the Rights of the Child, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989.
Nacrt Zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o maloletnim učiniocima krivičnih dela i krivičnopravnoj zaštiti maloletnih lica, dostupno na:
https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-propisa.php. 30.01.2022.
United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (The Riyadh Guidelines), adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 45/112 of 14 December 1990.
United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of Their Liberty: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, 2 April 1991, A/RES/45/113.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules), Adopted by General Assembly resolution 45/110 of 14 December 1990.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules), 1985.