PARASOCIAL COMMUNICATION ON SOCIAL NETWORKS: CASE STUDY OF NOVAK ĐOKOVIĆ AND HIS FOLLOWERS
Abstract
The paper deals with the presentation and analysis of parasocial communications using relevant communication theories and the psychology of media, communications and relationships, because new patterns of choice in communication processes have changed the way an individual enters into social relationships - from given (imposed) to chosen. The approach is expanded with a practical aspect - research into the parasocial communication of Novak Djokovic and his followers on the official Facebook page of our tennis player. The period during Roland Garros 2022 was taken for two reasons: it is one of the most important tournaments and the first big one after the break caused by refusing to be vaccinated against Covid/19 virus, which is why Djokovic did not participate in two of the four biggest tournaments before that year, and that at the same time he defended the position of the first player on the ATP list, which is why the engagement of followers was more intense than average. The approach is extended with a practical aspect - research into the parasocial communication of Novak Djokovic and his followers on his official Facebook page. The ways in which Djokovic addresses his fans and the content of his posts on Facebook encourage the development of a sense of closeness and familiarity among the audience. The research proved that parasocial interaction is realized in virtual communication in which Novak Djokovic's followers use the opportunity to address him through Facebook and often expect a return reaction. Social networks thus realize their procreative function, which is manifested in parasocial interaction through the exchange of messages, participation, togetherness and feedback simulation. Parasocial relationships are characterized by non-reciprocity, i.e. the fact that only one party knows a lot about the other, while the reverse is not true.
References
Boyd-Elison 2007: Danah Boyd- Nicole Ellison, Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and
Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. Доступно на: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x/full
Caers-De-Feyter-De-Couck-Stough-Vigna-Du-Bois 2013: Ralf Caers-Tim De-Feyter-Marijke
De-Couck Marijke-Talia Stough-Claudia Vigna-Cind Du-Bois, Facebook: A literature
review, New media & society, 15(6), 982-1002. DOI/10.1177/1461444813488061
Christodulides 2009: George Christodulides , Branding in the post – Internet era. Marketing
Theory, 9(1), 141-144. DOI.org/10.1177/1470593108100071
CISCO. (2021). WesternEurope - 2021 ForecastHighlights.
Jaye-Shira-Brooke 2008: Derrick Jaye-Gabriel Shira-Tippin Brooke, Parasocial relationships and
self – discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal relationships, 15, 261-280.
Di Pietro-Pantano 2012: Loredana Di Pietro-Eleonore Pantano, An Empirical Investigation of
social network influence on consumer purchasing decision: The Case of Facebook. Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 14, 18-29. DOI: 10.1057/dddmp.2012.10
Horton-Wohl 1956: Donald Horton-Richard Wohl, Mass communication and para-social
interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance". Psychiatry 19(3), 215–229.
Jenkins 2006: Henry Jenkins, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New
York University Press, New York.
Kotler-Kartajaya-Setiawan 2017: Philip Kotler-Hermawan Katajaya-Iwan Setiwan, Marketing
4.0. Moving from Traditional to Digital. JohnWiley&Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NewJersey.
Mazur 2010: E. Mazur, Collecting data from social networking Web sites and blogs, у:
Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research, ур. Sam Gosling-Јohn Johnson, 77-90. DOI.org/10.1037/12076-006
Милетић-Милетић 2021: Мирко Милетић-Невена Милетић, Комуниколошки лексикон,
Јасен, Београд.
Morley, D. & Brunsdon, C. (2005): The Nationwide Television Studies. Routledge, New York.
Paquette, H., (2013). Social Media as a Marketing Tool: A Literature Review, Major Papers by
Master of Science Students. Paper 2.
Перић-Красуља-Гујаница 2011: Ненад Перић-Невена Красуља-Ивана Гујаница, Медијске,
ПР и бренд тенденције, друго, проширено издање, Београд: Synopsis и Чигоја штампа.
Рот, 1999: Никола Рот, Психологија група, Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства, Београд.
Stever 2009: Gayle Stever, Parasocial and Social Interaction with Celebrities: Classification of
Media Fans. Journal of media psychology, 14(3), 1-39.
Van Dijck-Poell 2013: José Van Dijck-Thomas Poell, Understanding Social Media Logic,
Media and Communication, 1(1), 2-14. DOI.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
Vranešević-Perić-Marušić 2019: Tihomir Vranešević-Nenad Perić-Tamara Marušić, Perception
of Social Media as a Source of Relevant Information, Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 22(1), 133-144.
Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D., Graham, L.T., (2012), A Review of Facebook Research in Social
Sciences, Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(3), 203-220. DOI:10.1177/1745691612442904
www.ictbussines.com
Џајлс 2011: Дејвид Џајлс, Психологија медија, Клио, Београд.