"NETWORKED INDIVIDUALISM" - A CHALLENGE OF DIGITALIZATION
Abstract
The rise of digital technologies has transformed society into an entirely different environment for living and has turned the individual into an entity within which altered lifestyle habits are nurtured. The transformation of social relationships brought about by digitization is best illustrated through the concept of "networked individualism." The aim of this paper is to highlight the fundamental characteristics of this phenomenon, as well as its societal conditioning. The fundamental tenets of "networked individualism" manifest through two processes: the process of individualization and the process of societal incorporation of individualized individuals through networks. New technologies condition such a type of social relationships that is based on personal affinities. "Networked individualism" emerges as the dominant form of sociality resulting from the community's need, as a form of sociality, to establish itself as a network of interpersonal connections, providing a sense of belonging and social identity. On the one hand, this pointed to the impossibility of the community resisting the temptations of the digital era, and on the other hand, it showed its struggle to persist despite changing circumstances. Based on the consideration of various theoretical approaches, the authors observe that networked individualism is used as the primary analytical unit in understanding the organization of society. In this revised understanding, the individual is positioned as an autonomous center within communities characterized by weaker connections compared to their predecessors. The paper raises the question of how weaker connectivity affects social capital and its form in terms of Putnam's sense of bonding and bridging capital. The shift from dense to dispersed networks results in the transformation of membership from permanent to temporary, partial affiliations with different networks. Communication and interaction remain essential elements of everyday life but occur within the confines of loose networks. The consideration of this new type of social relationships through the so-called network analysis has opened the door to understanding the relationship between traditional and modern society, with a focus on their mutual interplay and complementarity.
References
Barnes 1954: John A. Barnes. „Class and committee in a Norwegian Island parish“. Human Relations, 7 (1), 39-58.
Барнес 1982: Хари Е. Барнес. Увод у историју социологије II. Београд: БИГЗ.
Бек 2001: Улрих Бек. Ризично друштво. Београд: Филип Вишњић.
Burt 1992: Ronald Burt. „The Social Structure of Competition”. Networks and Organizations. Form and Action. Nohria N. & Eccles R. (eds.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Burt 2001: Ronald S. Burt. „Structural holes versus network closure as social capital”. Social Capital: Theory and Research. Lin, N., K. Cook & R. S. Burt (eds). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 31-56.
Burt 2002: Ronald S. Burt. „The Social Capital of Structural Holes”. The New Economic Sociology. Guillen, M., Collins, R., England, P. and Meyer, M. (eds). New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 148‐193.
Burt 2005: Ronald S. Burt. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Castells 2000a: Manuel Castells. Uspon umreženog društva. Zagreb: Golden marketing.
Castells 2001: Manuel Castells. The Internet Galaxy. Oxford: University press.
Castells 2004: Manuel Castells. „Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint“. The network society: a crosscultural perspective. Castells (eds). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Coleman 1990: James Coleman. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eklund, Sadowski 2021: Lina Eklund, Helga Sadowski. „Doing intimate family work through ICTs in the time of networked individualism“. Journal of Family Studies, 29(2).
Garguilo, Benassi 2000: Martin Garguilo, Mario Benassi. „Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes and the Adaptation of Social Capital“. Organisation Science, vol. 11, 2, 183-196.
Гиденс 1998: Ентони Гиденс. Последице модерности. Београд : Филип Вишњић.
Голубовић 2008: Наташа Голубовић. „Извори друштвеног капитала“. Социологија, вол. L (2008), N° 1 https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2008/0038-03180801017G.pdf
Granovetter 1973: Mark S. Granovetter. „The Strength of Weak Ties”. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 78(6), 1360‐1380.
Granovetter 1982: Mark S. Granovetter. „Alienation reconsidered: The strength of weak ties“. Connections 5 (2), 416.
Granovetter 1983: Mark Granovetter. „The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited“. Sociological Theory, Vol. 1, 201‐233.
Heaney, McClurg 2009: Michael T. Heaney, Scott D. McClurg. „Social networks and American politics: Introduction to the special Issue”. American Politics Research, 37 (5), 727-741.
Himanen 2001: Pekka Himanen. The Hacker Ethicand the Spirit of the Information Age. New York: Random House, Inc.
Homans 1974: George C. Homans. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms – Revised Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Knoke 2003: David Knoke. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lash 2002: Scott Lash. „Individualization in a Non‐Linear Mode“. Individualization. Beck U. and Beck Gernsheim E. London: Sage publications, VII‐XIII.
Latour 2005: Bruno Latour. Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Lin 2003: Nan Lin. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Lupton 2014: Deborah Lupton. Digital Sociology. London & NY: Routledge.
Петровић 2007: Далибор Петровић. „Од друштвених мрежа до умреженог друштва‐један осврт на макро‐мрежни приступ у социологији”. Социологија, вол. 49(2), 161‐182.
Петровић 2008: Далибор Петровић. У међумрежју Интернет и нови обрасци друштвености. Београд : ИСИ & СФ.
Петровић 2009: Далибор Петровић. „Интернет у функцији персоналног умрежавања”. Социологија, вол. 51(1), 23‐44.
Петровић, Томић 2012: Далибор Петровић, Наташа Томић – Петровић. „Интернет у функцији креирања друштвеног капитала његових корисника“. XXX Симпозијум о новим технологијама у поштанском и телекомуникационом саобраћају – ПосТел 2012. Београд.
Пешић 1998: Михајло Пешић. Социологија. Београд : Институт за политичке студије – Чигоја.
Peračković, Petrinjak 2021: Krešimir Peračković, Hrvoje Petrinjak. „Virtual sociabilty – between virtual communities and networked individualism“. Disputatio Philosophica, vol. 23 (1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.23.1.3
Praprotnik 2019: Tadej Praprotnik. „The power to choose or power to lose? Networked individualism and the usage of social media“. Management international conference. Opatija – Croatia. DOI:10.26493/978-961-6832-68-7.12
Rainie, Wellman 2012: Lee Rainie, Barry Wellman. „Networked: the new social operating system“. Revija za sociologiju, 42 (2), 213 -226. DOI:10.5613/rzs.42.2.5
Rapoport, Horvath 1961: Anatoi Rapoport, William J. Horvath. „A study of a large sociogram“. Behavioral Science 6 (4), 279-291.
Rychłowska-Niesporek 2019: Agnieszka Rychłowska-Niesporek. „Seeking a life partner with the use of internet Technology“. Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne, 25(2), 12-31. DOI:10.21697/ucs.2019.25.2.05
Rychłowska-Niesporek 2023: Agnieszka Rychłowska-Niesporek. „Information society, networked individualism and intimacy practices“. Transformacje Pismo interdyscyplinarne, 4(119), 45-65.
Тили 1997: Чарлс Тили. Суочавање са друштвеном променом. Београд : Филип Вишњић.
Турза 1998: Карел Турза. Луис Манфордједна критика модерности. Београд : Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства.
Urry 2003: John Urry. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity
Urry 2005: John Urry. , J. „The Complexities of the Global“. Theory, Culture and Society, 22 (5), 235-254.
Шкорић 2006: Марко Шкорић. „Микросоциологија социјалног капитала и могућности микро-макро транслације“. Социјални капитал и друштвена интеграција. М. Трипковић (ур.). Нови Сад: Филозофски факултет, 35-72.
Шкорић, Томашевић 2011: Марко Шкорић, Александар Томашевић. „Грановетерова теорија о снази слабих веза“. Социолошки преглед, 44 (3), 323-336.
Uzzi 1999: Brian Uzzi. „Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing“. American Sociological Review, Vol.64(4), 481-505.
Wellman, Quan, Witte, and Hampton 2001: Barry Wellman, Haase Quan, James Witte, Keith Hampton. “Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Supplement Social Capital?”. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45(3), 436‐455.
Wittel 2001: Andreas Wittel. „Toward a Network Sociality”. Theory, Culture Society, Vol. 18(6), 51‐76.