ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN STRATEGIC CULTURE AND GLOBALIZATION
Abstract
The paper explores the complex interactions between strategic culture, globalization and the development of artificial intelligence and their role in national security. One of the key aspects that stands out is the need for adaptability in response to these new challenges. Globalization and artificial intelligence are changing the landscape of national security, affecting the way states consider and respond to various threats. There is a need for flexibility and adaptability both at the strategic level and in the context of political action in order to adequately respond to contemporary challenges in the field of security. Advances in artificial intelligence require states to quickly react and adapt to new opportunities, but also challenges. This includes the development of standards and legal regulations that will ensure the ethical, legal and safe application of artificial intelligence in the context of national security.
Additionally, adaptability is essential in developing strategies to counter new security threats arising from globalization. The process of globalization may bring new challenges, such as transnational terrorism and cyber threats, which require a coordinated response and cooperation at the international level. An appropriate national security strategy must be able to rapidly adapt to these new challenges and incorporate new technologies and approaches, including artificial intelligence. Also, adaptability is important in the context of developing a strategy for the adoption of artificial intelligence in the domain of national security. This includes the training and education of professionals, the development of new skills and capacities, as well as the constant updating and refinement of safety management strategies and techniques. Only through an adaptable and flexible approach is it possible to successfully face the new and complex challenges brought by globalization and the development of artificial intelligence.
References
Baldwin 2018: Richard Baldwin. If this is Globalization 4.0, what were the other three? World Economic Forum, 22. децембар 2018.
Bloomfield 2012: Alan Bloomfield. „Time to Move On: Reconceptualizing the Strategic Culture Debate“. Contemporary Security Policy, 33(3), 437–461.
Davis-O'Halloran 2018: Nicholas Davis, Derek O'Halloran. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is driving Globalization 4.0. World Economic Forum, 8. новембар 2018. < https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-is-driving-a-new-phase-of-globalization/> [5. фебруар 2024].
Friedman 2005: Thomas L. Friedman. It's a Flat World, After All. The New York Times Magazine, 3. април 2005.
Gray 1999: Colin S. Gray. Modern Strategy . New York: Oxford University Press.
Jerome 2023: Glenn Jerome. Artificial General Iintelligence. Issues and opportunities.
Johnson 2006: Jeannie L. Johnson. Strategic culture: Refining the theoretical construct.
Johnson 2022: Robert J. Johnson. The Evolution of Strategic Cultural Thought and Its Application to an Understanding of Chinese Strategic Culture. FAOA Journal of International Affairs, 31. децембар 2022.
Johnston 1995: Alastair Iain Johnston. „Thinking about Strategic Culture“. International Security, vol. 19, no. 4, 32–64.
Joshi 2023: Manoj Joshi. National security is defining Globalisation 2.0. ORF, 6. јун 2023.
Kartchner- Bowen- Johnson 2023: Kerry M. Kartchner, Briana D. Bowen, Jeannie L. Johnson. Routledge Handbook of Strategic Culture. London: Routledge.
Klein 1988: Bradley S. Klein. „Hegemony and strategic culture: American power projection and alliance defence politics“. Review of International Studies, 14(2):133-148.
Kreveld 2010: Martin v. Kreveld. Transformacija rata. Beograd: JP Službeni glasnik, Fakultet bezbednosti.
Libel 2020: Tamir Libel. Strategic culture as a (discursive) institution: a proposal for falsifiable theoretical model with computational operationalization. Defence Studies, 20(4), 353-372.
Morgan 2003: Forrest Morgan. Compellence and the strategic culture of imperial Japan : implications for coercive diplomacy in the twenty-first century. Westport, CN.: Praeger.
Office of Ombudsman 2012: Different Dimensions of Globalization.
Peng 2020: Mike W. Peng. Global strategy (Fourth edition). Cengage Learning.
Risse 2019: Thomas Risse. „7. Social Constructivism and European Integration“. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snayder 1977: Jack L. Snyder. The Soviet Strategic Culture : Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations.
Taneja-Zakaria 2023: Hemant Taneja, Fareed Zakaria. AI and the New Digital Cold War. Harvard Business Review, 6. септембар 2023.
Yellen 2023: Janet L. Yellen. Remarks by Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen on the U.S. - China Economic Relationship at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. U.S. Department of the treasury, 20. април 2023.
Благојевић 2019: Вељко Благојевић. „Стратешка култура и национална безбедност“. Зборник Матице српске за друштвене науке, LXX, број 170, 2/2019, 163-178.