The Female Target: Digitality, Psychoanalysis and the Gangbang
Sažetak
The essay culls from classical texts and personal experiences of libertine intimacy with strangers to address age-old academic blind spots regarding group sex as a recurring fantasy and sexual practice. What is brought forth is a Freudian and Lacanian analysis of the relationship between contemporary desire and digitality through “the gangbang” as articulated on digital platforms. The focus is on digitally-assisted gangbangs involving a transvestite and several heterosexually identified males, and what such events reveal about digital media’s and heterosexuality’s demands. The author argues that this sexual configuration is a re-enactment of "the great misdeed", which Freud recounts in Totem and Taboo as the mythic primordial killing of the Father by the band of brothers. This symbolic occasion is described as the genesis of social organization and re-emerges as a form of mourning the disappearance of the fleshly body as new media turn it into digital code. Such a codification of the body awakens anxieties around the fictitious conflation between penis and phallus. In the face of the digital, man outsources his phallic power, which is suddenly required to be represented corporally at all times, to a virtually organized multitude that is willing to sacrifice freedom in the name of the group, and the legitimation of hetero-masculinity that it can presumably grant. The gangbang also appears as a digitally mediated opportunity for old fantasies of aggression and expiation to articulate themselves without putting the white male heterosexual body on the line.
Reference
Benslama, F. (2016). Le Surmusulman: Un Furieux Désir de Sacrifice. Paris: Seuil.
Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel Optimism. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 17(3): 20–36.
Butler, J. (2015, 12 January). What’s Wrong With ‘All Lives Matter’? The New York Times. Accessed 01. 05. 2015. URL: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/12/whats-wrong-with-all-lives-matter/#more-155504.
Chun, W. (2016). Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Boston: The MIT Press.
Crandall, K. (2011). Ontologies of the Wayward Drone. CTheory. Accessed 01. 05. 2015. URL: http://ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=693.
Debord, G. (2014). The Society of the Spectacle: Annotated Edition. Bureau of Public Secrets.
Despentes, V. (2006). King Kong théorie. Paris: Grasset.
Dollimore, J. (2001). Sexual Disgust. In Dean, T. & Lane, C. (ed.), Homosexuality & Psychoanalysis (pp. 367–386). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In Bouchard, D. F. (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (pp. 139–164). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Freud, S. (2011). Civilization & Its Discontents. Martino Publishing.
Freud, S. (1919). The ‘Uncanny’. Imago, 5 (5-6): 297-324.
Freud, S. (2013). Totem and Taboo. New York: Empire Books.
Giard, A. (2015, 01 October) Pourquoi Les Bruits de Sécretion Excitent? [Why Do Secretion Noises Turn Us On?]. Libération, “Les 400 Culs”]. Accessed 10. 04. 2015. URL: http://sexes.blogs.liberation.fr/agnes_giard/2014/10/il-y-a-toujours-une-forme-de-traumatisme-avec-la-sexualit%C3%A9-on-a-beau-avoir-%C3%A9tudi%C3%A9-les-organes-g%C3%A9nitaux-%C3%A0-l%C3%A9cole-et.html.
Grigg, R. (2014, 26 November). Why Freud’s Theory of Melancholia is All Wrong [audio from lecture at Kingston University]. Accessed 15. 03. 2015. URL: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2014/11/russell-grigg-why-freuds-theory-of-melancholia-is-all-wrong/.
Halberstam, J. (2011). The Queer Art of Failure. Duke University Press.
Haver, W. (1996). The Body of This Death: Historicity and Sociality in the Time of AIDS. Stanford University Press.
Klein, M. (1988). Love, Guilt and Reparation: And Other Works 1921-1945. London: Virago.
Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (1971). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVIII: On A Discourse That Might Not Be a Semblance (1971). (C. Gallagher, trans.). Accessed 03. 02 .2017. URL: http://www.valas.fr/IMG/pdf/THE-SEMINAR-OF-JACQUES-LACAN-XVIII_d_un_discours.pdf.
Leiner, D. (Director). (2000). Dude, Where's My Car? [Motion picture on DVD]. USA.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1): 11–40.
McPherson, T. (2012). U.S. Operating Systems at Mid-century: The Intertwining of Race and UNIX. In Nakamura, L., Chow-White, P. & Nelson, A. (eds.), Race after the Internet (pp. 21–37). New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, J. (2003). Siblings: Sex and Violence. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Moraes, C. (2016, 07 June). Compartilhar estupro coletivo nas redes, a nova versão da barbárie brasileira. El País. Accessed 07. 06. 2016. URL: http://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2016/05/26/politica/1464275134_153470.html.
Paasonen, S. (2011). Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perlongher, N. (1997). Prosa Plebeya: Ensayos 1980-1992. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Colihue S.R.L.
Phillips, W. (2015). This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Boston: The MIT Press.
Preciado, B. (2000). Manifeste Contra-Sexuel, Paris: Balland.
Preciado, B. (2008). Testo Junkie: Sexe, Drogue et Biopolitique. Paris: Grasset.
Sáez, J. & Carrascosa, S. (2012). Por El Culo: Políticas Anales. Barcelona and Madrid: Egales.
Salamon, G. (2010). Assuming a Body: Transgender and Rhetorics of Materiality. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shah, N. (2015). The Selfie and the Slut: Bodies, Technology and Public Shame. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(17): 86–93.
Silverman, K. (1986). Fragments of a Fashionable Discourse. In Modleski, T. (ed.), Studies in Entertainment: Critical Approaches to Mass Culture (pp. 139–152). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Winch, A. & Hakim, J. (2017, forthcoming). ‘I’m Selling the Dream Really aren’t I?’: Sharing Fit Male Bodies on Social Networking Sites. In McGillivray, D., McPherson, G. & Carnicelli, S. (eds.), Digital Leisure Cultures: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima.
Licenciranje
Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo - Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA). Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i originalno.
Korisnici su pri tome dužni da navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija), kao i njegovu DOI oznaku. U slučaju objavljivanja u elektronskoj formi takođe su dužni da postave HTML link, kako sa originalnim člankom objavljenim u časopisu CM: Communication and Media, tako i sa korišćenom licencom.
Autori mogu da stupaju u zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju rada objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je rad prvobitno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
Politika samoarhiviranja
Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Autori su obavezni da pritom navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija) i postave link, kako na DOI oznaku tog članka, tako i na korišćenu licencu.Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Odricanje od odgovornosti
Stavovi izneti u objavljenim radovima ne izražavaju stavove urednika i članova redakcije časopisa. Autori preuzimaju pravnu i moralnu odgovornost za ideje iznete u svojim radovima. Izdavač neće snositi nikakvu odgovornost u slučaju ispostavljanja bilo kakvih zahteva za naknadu štete.