Media Traumatization, Symbolic Wounds and Digital Culture
Sažetak
Do media images really traumatize the public? If they do not, then why do so many commentators – from those commemorating the Holocaust to those analysing the impact of 9/11 – claim that trauma can be transmitted to specific ethnic groups or entire societies? While these claims can be based on empirical data or used to justify political agendas, psychoanalysis also continues to influence conceptions of collective trauma and to offer important perspectives for evaluating these conceptions. This paper explores these questions of mediated trauma and collective identity by tracing a neglected historical trajectory back to the work of psychoanalyst and anthropologist Geza Roheim. Roheim produced studies of Australian Aboriginal culture that applied the theory of collective trauma outlined in Freud's Totem and Taboo. He also produced an ethnographic film, Subincision, documenting an initiation rite, that was subsequently used in psychological studies of so-called “stress films”. Putting aside Roheim's psychoanalytic interpretations of indigenous culture, psychologists used his film to measure the impact of images of violence and pain. These studies from the 1960s have recently been rediscovered by scholars of Holocaust film and video testimony. This paper seeks to recover the concept of “symbolic wounds” developed in psychoanalyst Bruno Bettelheim’s later commentary on Roheim’s work. The mass media of newspapers, film and television have supported the idea of cultural trauma shared by large societies. The concept of symbolic wounds that enhance group membership and mobilize collective action may be more useful for understanding how violent and shocking images are put to more diverse uses in digital culture.
Reference
Alexander, J. (2012). Trauma: A Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Benjamin, W. (2003). Selected Writings Volume 4, 1938-1940. H. Eiland & M. Jennings (Eds.) Trans. E. Jephcott et al. Cambidge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Bettelheim, B. (1955). Symbolic Wounds: Puberty Rites and the Envious Male. London: Thames and Hudson.
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative and History. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Felman, S. & Laub, M. D. (1992). Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History. New York and London: Routledge.
Freud, S. (1913/1953-74). Totem Taboo. In Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 13 (pp. 1–101). London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
Freud, S. (1920/1953-74). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. In Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 18 (pp. 1–64). London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
Hirsch, J. (2004). Afterimage: Film, Trauma and the Holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Holmes, E. & Bourne, C. (2008). Inducing and Modulating Intrusive Emotional Memories: A Review of the Trauma Film Paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 127: 553–566.
Horowitz, M. (1969). Psychic Trauma: Return of Images after a Stress Film. Archives of General Psychiatry, 20(5): 552 –559.
Howard, P. & Hussain, M. (2011). The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3): 35–48.
Kaplan, E. A. (2005). Trauma Culture: The Politics of Terror and Loss in Media and Literature. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.
Khondker, H. (2011). Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5): 675–679.
Lazarus, R., Speisman, J., Madkoff, A. & Davison, L. (1962). A Laboratory Study of Psychological Stress Produced by a Motion Picture Film. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(34): 1–36.
Le Barre, W. (1966). Geza Roheim, 1891-1953: Psychoanalysis and Anthropology. In Alexander, F., Eisenstein, S. & Grothohn, M. (eds.), Psychoanalytic Pioneers (pp. 272–291). New York and London: Basic.
Leys, R. (2000). Trauma: A Genealogy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Leys, R. (2007). From Guilt to Same: Auschwitz and After. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Lifton, R. (1967). Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: Random House.
Lifton, R. (1973). Home form the War: Vietnam Veterans: Neither Victims nor Executioners. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Meek, A. (2010). Trauma and Media: Theories, Histories and Images. New York and London: Routledge.
Meek, A. (2016). Biopolitical Media: Catastrophe, Immunity and Bare Life. New York and London: Routledge.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2011). Cloning Terror: The War of Images, 9/11 to the Present. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Morpurgo, V. (2016). From Prometheus to Big Brother: A Prosthetic God, Truly Magnificent. In Marzi, A. (ed.), Psychoanalysis, Identity, and the Internet: Explorations and the Internet (pp. 33 –50). London: Karnac.
Neria, Y., Di Grande, L. & Adams, B. G. (2011). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following the September 11, 2001, Terrorist attacks: A review of the Literature among Highly Exposed Populations. American Psychology, (66)6: 429–446.
Pinchevski, A. (2015). Screen Trauma: Visual Media and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(4): 51–75.
Poster, M. (2006). Information Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of Digital Machines. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Robinson, P. (1969). The Freudian Left: Wilhelm Reich, Geza Roheim, Herert Marcuse. New York, Evanston and London: Harper and Row.
Roheim, G. (1950). Psychoanalysis and Anthropology: Culture, Personality and the Unconscious. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Sontag, S. (1977). On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Trimarco, J. & Depret, M.H. (2005). Wounded Nation, Broken Time. In Heller, D. (ed.), The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity (pp. 27–53). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Wallace, P. (2016). The Psychology of the Internet (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Young, A. (2007). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder of the Virtual Kind: Trauma and Resilience in Post-9/11 America. In Sarat, A., Davidovitch, N. & Albertstein, M. (eds.), Trauma and Memory: Reading, Healing, and Making Law (pp. 21–48). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima.
Licenciranje
Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo - Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA). Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i originalno.
Korisnici su pri tome dužni da navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija), kao i njegovu DOI oznaku. U slučaju objavljivanja u elektronskoj formi takođe su dužni da postave HTML link, kako sa originalnim člankom objavljenim u časopisu CM: Communication and Media, tako i sa korišćenom licencom.
Autori mogu da stupaju u zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju rada objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je rad prvobitno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
Politika samoarhiviranja
Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Autori su obavezni da pritom navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija) i postave link, kako na DOI oznaku tog članka, tako i na korišćenu licencu.Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Odricanje od odgovornosti
Stavovi izneti u objavljenim radovima ne izražavaju stavove urednika i članova redakcije časopisa. Autori preuzimaju pravnu i moralnu odgovornost za ideje iznete u svojim radovima. Izdavač neće snositi nikakvu odgovornost u slučaju ispostavljanja bilo kakvih zahteva za naknadu štete.