REGIONAL INEQUALITIES OF ECONOMIC AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Keywords: regional development, rural development, regional policy, Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics (NUTS)

Abstract


Having in mind the fact that there are significant differences in the development of the regions in many countries, well-formulated regional policy and its implementation are important determinants of reducing existing regional inequalities and also they are the factors of rural development. Accordingly, the subject of research in this paper are disparities at the NUTS 2 level in the Republic of Serbia, with the aim of determining the level of economic development of the regions and the rural development of the Republic of Serbia. Thereby, an important role of regional policy in the regional convergence and achieving a more balanced regional and rural development is emphasized. The comparative analysis in the paper identifies significant differences between the Belgrade region and other regions in the Republic of Serbia, that are predominantly rural. In order to overcome these differences, the necessity of innovative solutions and an active regional policy is emphasized.

Author Biographies

Jasmina Dimitrijevic, Postal Savings Bank j. s. c. Belgrade, Branch Kragujevac, Serbia

PhD student at the Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac

Milos Dimitrijevic, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia

Research Assistant

Lela M. Ristic, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia

Full Professor

References


  1. Amin, A., & Tomaney, J. (1995). Behind the Myth of European Union: Prospects for cohesion. London: Routledge.

  2. Bogavac-Cvetković, N., Kotlica, S., i Pavlović, R. (2013). Modeli podrške regionalnom razvoju. Ekonomski vidici, 18(2-3), 221-236.

  3. Bogdanov, N. (2007). Mala ruralna domaćinstva u Srbiji i ruralna nepoljoprivredna ekonomija. Beograd: UNDP.

  4. Boldrin, M., & Canova, F. (2001). Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy, 16(32), 205-253.

  5. Bradley, J., Petrakos, G., & Traistaru, I. (2005). Integration, Growth and Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union: An Overview (pp. 1-25). In Bradley, J., Petrakos, G., & Traistaru, I. (eds.): Integration, Growth and Cohesion in asn Enlarged European Union. New York: Springer.

  6. Djukić, P. (2013). Prokletstvo regionalnih pozicija – mogućnosti održivog regionalnog razvoja u Srbiji. Ekonomski vidici, 18(2-3), 189-208.

  7. Ilić, V. M. (2015). Decentralization of EU member states and its effects on regional development: Experiences and recommendations for Serbia. Business Economics, 9(1), 77-94.

  8. Jovančević, R. (2012). Izazovi kohezijske politike Europske unije, 2014-2020. (str. 179-207). U: Družić, G. & Družić, I. (eds.): Razvojna strategija malog nacionalnog gospodarstva u globaliziranom svijetu. Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Ekonomski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

  9. Lončar, Z. (2009). Nastanak i razvoj ideje o regionalizaciji Srbije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 43(2), 333–344.

  10. Martin, P. (2005). The geography of inequalities in Europe. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 13, 83-108.

  11. Mijačić, D., & Paunović, B. (2011). Reginalne razlike u Srbiji. Ekonomika preduzeća, 59(7-8), 379-389. doi:10.5937/ekopre1108379M

  12. OECD (2011). OECD Regional Typology: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionalpolicy/OECD_regional_typology_Nov2012.pdf (Accessed on 14.05.2022.)

  13. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1325-1352.

  14. Veselinović, P., Dimitrijević, M., & Kostić, M. (2019). Significance of fiscal policy for economic development and agriculture. Economics of Agriculture, 66(2), 357-373.

  15. Vujičić, M., Ristić, L., & Kostić, M. (2015). Classification of rural areas according to population density criteria in Sumadija and Western Serbia Region. Economic Outlook, 17(1), 35-48.

  16. Winkler, A. (2012). Measuring regional inequality: an index of socio-economic pressure for Serbia. Collection of papers – Faculty of Geography at University of Belgrade, 60, 81-102.

  17. Закон о регионалном развоју ("Службени гласник РС", бр. 51/2009, 30/2010 и 89/2015).

  18. РАС (2022). Развојна агенција Србије, Београд: https://ras.gov.rs/regionalni-razvoj (Приступљено 10.05.2022.)

  19. Републички завод за статистику (2020а). Анкета о радној снази: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2020/Pdf/G20205658.pdf (Приступљено 14.05.2022.)

  20. Републички завод за статистику (2020б). Билтен - Научноистраживачка делатност у Републици Србији, 2019. РЗС: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2020/Pdf/G20205668.pdf (Приступљено 14.05.2022.)

  21. Републички завод за статистику (2020ц). Предузећа у Републици Србији, према величини, 2019. РЗС: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2020/Pdf/G202010112.pdf (Приступљено 14.05.2022.)

  22. Републички завод за статистику (2021). Регионални бруто домаћи производ – Региони и области РС, 2019. РЗС: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2021/Pdf/G202110115.pdf (Приступљено 14.05.2022.)

  23. РЗС (2011-2020). Општине и региони у Републици Србији: https://www.stat.gov.rs/publikacije/ (Приступљено 15.05.2022.)

  24. РЗС (2022). Административно територијална подела и НСТЈ нивои 1, 2, 3: https://www.stat.gov.rs/sr-Latn/oblasti/registar-prostornih-jedinica-i-gis/administrativno-teritorijalna-podela-i-nstj-nivoi-1-2-3 (Приступљено 10.05.2022.)

  25. Стратегија регионалног развоја Републике Србије 2007–2012. ("Службени гласник РС", бр. 55/05, 71/05).

  26. Устав Републике Србије ("Службени гласник РС", бр. 98/2006, 115/2021).

Published
2022/06/29
Section
Članci