ATTITUDES OF AUDITORS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA ABOUT USING OF VIRTUAL MEETINGS

  • Nemanja Jakovljevic /
  • Jovanka Jakovljević Chief Accountant
Keywords: virtual meetings, Covid19, audit, respondents.

Abstract


The Covid19 has significantly changed the way we live and work. The way viruses are transmitted and people become infected has caused social distancing and avoidance of mutual contacts, which is largely reflected in the way audit meetings are held, which, unlike the previous reliance on physical presence in the office and direct communication between members of the audit team and others moved to a new environment that can be considered virtual. In most cases, meetings are held using internet applications, which means without physical presence. The subject of the research is to examine the attitudes of respondents engaged in audit work on the use of virtual meetings in the audit. The main conclusion is that respondents believe that the use of virtual meetings in auditing is useful, but at the same time, they are not ready to fully adapt to the continuous use of virtual meetings, because they believe that in some cases physical presence meetings are more useful than virtual meetings.

References

1.     Achakulvisut T., et al. (2020). Improving on legacy conferences by moving online, eLife Sciences, 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57892;


2.     Bell G., et al. (2009). Beyond the Data Deluge, Science, 323(5919), 1297-1298, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170411;


3.     Campbell, B., Mcllgorm, A., Voyer, M. (2021). Virtual Regional Fisheries Management Meetings in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Region: A Preliminary Appraisal of Performance and Fit, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.710088;


4.     Duane B., et al. (2021). Webinars reduce the environmental footprint of pediatric cardiology conferences, Cardiology in the Young 31(10), 1-8, 8http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1047951121000718;


5.     Erickson, T., et al. (2011). Synchronous interaction among hundreds: An evaluation of a conference in an avatar-based virtual environment, Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems, 503–512, https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979013;


6.     Fadlelmola F. M., et al. (2019). Ten simple rules for organizing a webinar series, PLoS Computational Biology, 15(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006671;


7.     Falk M, Hagsten E. (2020). When international academic conferences go virtual, Scientometrics, 126(7788), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03754-5;


8.     Fraser, H., et al. (2016). The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation, Conservation Biology 31(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12837;


9.     Holman C., et al. (2021). How to connect academics around the globe by organizing an asynchronous virtual unconference, Wellcome Open Research, 6, 156, http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16893.2;


10.  Jakovljević, N, Jakovljević J. (2021a). The impact of the Covid-19 global pandemic on the responsibility of auditors. 92-113,


11.  Jakovljević, N. (2021b). Analysis of the impact of the Covid-19 epidemic through the sojourn tax and the attitudes of the respondents. Trendovi u poslovanju. 2/2021(18) 20-29, https://doi.org/10.5937/trendpos2102022J;


12.  Jakovljević, N. (2021c). Irregularities in conducting the list of assets and liabilities. Trendovi u poslovanju, 1/2021(17), 94-104, https://doi.org/10.5937/trendpos2101094J;


13.  Jakovljević, N. (2021d). Political neutrality in the audit profession: attitudes of respondents in the Republic of Serbia. BizInfo (Blace) Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics. 12(2), 23-38, https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo2102023J;  


14.  Jakovljević, N. (2022e). Analiza problematike sertifikacije lica u revizorskoj profesiji u javnom sektoru u Republici Srbiji. Ekonomski pogledi, 24(1), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.5937/ep24-37934;


15.  Jakovljevic, N. (2022f). Remote work in audit in the private and public sector in the Republic of Serbia. BizInfo (Blace) Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 13(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo2201065J;


16.  Jakovljević, N. (2022g). Certification of internal auditors in the public sector in the Republic of Serbia, advantages and disadvantages. Knowledge - International Journal, 52(1), 37–43. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/5162;


17.  Jeremić, N., Jeremić, M., Jakovljević, N. (2021). Agility of internal audit. Revizor. 24(95-96), 57-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/Rev2196057J;


18.  Jeremić, N., Jakovljević, N., Jeremić, M. (2022). The role of internal auditing in business continuity. Revizor 25(97-98):53-71, http://dx.doi.org/10.56362/Rev2298053J;


19.  Katherine, A., Karl. J., V., Peluchette, N., A. (2021). Virtual Work Meetings During the COVID-19 Pandemic the Good, Bad, and Ugly, Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211015286;


20.  Kaushik, S. (2021). In Reference to „Virtual Meetings are Here to Stay: A Commentary on Virtual Meetings and Conferences in COVID Times “, Bengal Physician Journal, 8(2), 59-59, http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10070-7056;


21.  Murdock, H., M., et al. (2020). Virtual Morning Report During COVID‐19: A Novel Model for Case‐Based Teaching Conferences, Medical Education, 54(9), http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14226;


22.  Nanos, A., G., James, A., E. (2013). A Virtual Meeting System for the New Age, Conference: e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), IEEE 10th International Conference, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICEBE.2013.15;


23.  Niner, H. J., et al. (2020). The pandemic push: can COVID-19 reinvent conferences to models rooted in sustainability, equitability and inclusion, Socio Ecol Pract Res, 2, 253–256, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs42532-020-00059-y;


24.  Niner, H. J., Wassermann, S. N. (2021). Better for Whom? Leveling the Injustices of International Conferences by Moving Online, Frontiers in Marine Science, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.638025;


25.  Rubinger L., et al. (2020). Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: a review of best practices, International Orthopedics 44(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04615-9;


26.  Sanz-Cobena A., et al. (2020). Research meetings must be more sustainable, Nature Food, 1, 187–189;


27.  Sarabipour S., et al. (2020). Evaluating features of scientific conferences: A call for improvements, Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 296–300, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01067-y


28.  Viglione, G. (2020). A year without conferences? How the coronavirus pandemic could change research, Nature, 579(7799), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00786-y;


29.  Zibrek, K., Pan, X., Orel, M. (2021). Editorial: Meeting Remotely—The Challenges of Optimal Avatar Interaction in VR, Frontiers in virtual reality, 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.773258;  


30.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljfRoHDET0o приступ дана 13.07.2022. у 15:42 часова


31.  https://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/virtual-internal-audits-pandemic/ приступ дана 13.07.2022. у 15:29

Published
2022/12/30
Section
Članci