EVALUATION OF TRANSPORT AND STORAGE PERFORMANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

  • Radojko Lukić Ekonomski fakultet Beograd
Keywords: performance, transport, storage, European Union, MARCOS method

Abstract


The evaluation of transport and storage performance is continuously current, significant and complex. This paper analyzes the performance of transport and storage in the European Union based on the MARCOS method. The research results show that in terms of transport and storage performance, the top five countries in order include: Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Poland. The developed countries of the European Union are therefore in question. The performance of transport and storage is better in Croatia than in Slovenia due to, among other things, the significantly lower overall procurement of goods and services. The improvement of transport performance can be significantly influenced by effective control of analyzed factors (number of companies, number of employees, turnover, total procurement of goods and services, personnel, added value by factor costs and gross operating surplus). The implementation of the concept of sustainable development and digitization of the entire transport and storage business plays a significant role in this.

References

1. Đalić, I., Stević, Ž., Erceg, Ž., Macura, P., & Terzić, S. (2020). Selection of a distribution channel using the integrated FUCOMMARCOS model. International Review, 3-4, 80-96. https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev2003080Q

2. To Duc Trung, (2022). Development of data normalization methods for multi-criteria decision making: applying for MARCOS method. Manufacturing Rev. 9, 22, 1-5.

3. Kovač, M., Tadić, S., Krstić, M., & Bouarima, M. B. (2021). Novel Spherical Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Assessment of DroneBased City Logistics Concepts. WILEY Hindawi Complexity Volume 2021, Article ID 2374955, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2374955

4. Korucuk, S., Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D. S. S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Assessment of ideal smart network strategies for logistics companies using an integrated picture fuzzy LBWA– CoCoSo framework. Management Decision, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2021-1621

5. Lukic, R., & Hadrovic Zekic, B. (2021). Evaluation of transportation and storage efficiency in Serbia based on RATIO analysis and the OCRA method. Proceedings of the 21th International Scientific Conference BUSINESS LOGISTICS IN MODERN MANAGEMENT October 7-8, Osijek, Croatia, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, 189-200.

6. Lukic, R. (2022). Application of MARCOS method in evaluation of efficiency of trade companies in Serbia. Ekonomski pogledi, 24(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.5937/ep24-38921

7. Mandić, K., Delibašić, B., Knežević, S. & Benković, S. (2017). Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia using the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 550-565. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305786

8. Mandić, K., Delibašić, B., Knežević, S., & Benković, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic modelling, 43, 30-37. doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.036.

9. Mešić, A., Miškić, S., Stević, Ž., & Mastilo, Z. (2022). Hybrid MCDM Solutions for Evaluation of the Logistics Performance Index of the Western Balkan Countries. Economics, 10(1), 13-34. DOI: 10.2478/eoik-2022-0004 

10. Osintsev, N. A. (2021). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Green Logistics. World of Transport and Transportation, 19(5), 231–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2021-19-5-13

11. Popović, V., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Lukovac, V., & Jovković, S. (2022). Multicriteria Optimization of Logistics Processes Using a Gray FUCOM-SWOT Model. Symmetry, 14, 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040794

12. Puška, A., Stević, Ž., & Stojanović, I. (2021). Selection of Sustainable Suppliers Using the Fuzzy MARCOS Method. Current Chinese Science, 1(2), 218-229. https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210298101999201109214028

13. Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Serv Sci, 1(1), 83-98.

14. Stević, Ž., & N. Brković, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated FUCOMMARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company. In Logistics, 4(1), 1-14. 10.3390/logistics4010004

15. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, Article 106231, 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231

16. Stevic, Ž., Miškic, S., Vojinovic, D., Huskanovic, E., Stankovic, M., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Development of a Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Transport Companies: PCA–DEA–MCDM Model. Axioms, 11(140), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ axioms11030140

17. Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotic, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, MDPI, 8, 457, 181-198.

18. Tadic, S., Kovac, M., Krstic, M., Roso, V., & Brnjac, N. (2021). The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development. Sustainability, 13, 5590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13105590

19. Thanh, N. V. (2022). Designing a MCDM Model for Selection of an Optimal ERP Software in Organization. Systems, 10, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ systems10040095

20. Trung, Do Duc. (2021). Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process. Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 71(2), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2021- 0019

21. Ulutaş, A., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., Stanujkic, D., Thanh Nguyen, Phong, T. N., & Karaköy, Ç. (2020). Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System. Published in: Mathematics, 1672(08), (1 October 2020), 01-15.

22. Yao, X., Wang, X., Xu, Z., & Skare, M. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Energy Efficiency Research. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 27(2), 505-521. (PDF) Bibliometric Analysis of the Energy Efficiency Research. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362384962_Bibliometri c_Analysis_of_the_Energy_Efficiency_Research [accessed Aug 01 2022].  

Published
2022/12/30
Section
Članci