A multi-criteria approach to bid selection in public procurement
Abstract
Business forms such as the goods and services sales to state-owned enterprises, due to its secure billing, are extremely attractive for private businesses and as such are susceptible to possible misuse. When there is the possibility of corruption, regardless of whether it takes place, not only the protection of the procurers’ rights must be discussed, but also the protection of all parties involved in public procurement processes. The aim of this paper is to give a possible multi-criteria methodology for selecting the optimal of the submitted bids within the public procurement tender. According to the Public Procurement Law in Serbia, the procurement contracting authority is required to define the criteria for the winning tender with valued weights. The contribution of this paper lies within the new methodology which enables procurator to use transparent, unique and, by Public Procurement Law, correct way of choosing the best one from bids submitted within public procurement tender.
References
Aschhoff, B., Sofka, B. (2009). Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? In Research Policy, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp. 1235-1247, ISSN 0048-7333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011.
Bobar, V., Mandic, K., Suknovic, M. (2015). Bidder Selection in Public Procurement using a Fuzzy Decision Support System, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 7(1), pp. 31-49.
Directors Forum (National IST Research Directors Forum Working Group on Public Procurement). (2006). Pre-Commercial procurement of Innovation. A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle, Brussels, Retreived from http://europa. eu.int/information society/ research/key docs/documents/procurement.pdf.
Edler, J., Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side, Research Policy, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp. 949-963.
European Commission. (2003). Investing in Research: An Action Plan for Europe, Communication COM 266 final/2, Brussels
European Commission. (2006), Creating an Innovative Europe — Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit and chaired by Mr. Esko Aho, EUR 22005, Luxembourg.
French, S., Simpson, L., Atherton, E., Belton, V. (1998). Problem Formulation for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, Report of a Workshop, Volume 7
Geroski, P. A. (1990). Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy, International Review of Applied Economics 4 (2), pp. 182-198.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., Harris, F. C. (1994). Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Volume 1, pp. 139-148.
Leković, B., Marić, S. (2016). The Nature of Corporate Governance and Performance in the Conditions of Ownership Concentration. Industrija, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 45-61
Lowinger, T. C. (1976). Discrimination in government procurement of foreign goods in the U.S. and Western Europe, Southern Economic Journal 42, pp. 451-460.
Mamula, T., Popović-Pantić S. (2015). Relationship between Innovativeness and Strategic Planning – empirical research. Industrija, Vol 43, No. 4, pp 47-65.
McCrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes, Natural Resources Forum, 28(4): pp. 257-267.
Nikolić, I., Kovačević, M. (2014). The Impact of Privatisation – Empirical Analysis and Results in Serbian Industry. Industrija, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 63-86.
Radojičić, M., Žižovic, M. (1998). Application of methods of multicriteria analysis in business decision making. Technical faculty in Čačak, Serbia (monograph in Serbian)
Rothwell, R., Zegveld., W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s, Frances Pinter, London.
Strategija razvoja javnih nabavki u Republici Srbiji za period 2014-2018. godine. (2014). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 55/05. Retrieved from http://www.ujn.gov.rs
Strategija razvoja javnih nabavki u Republici Srbiji. (2011). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 55/05. Retrieved from http://mfin.gov.rs
Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying Ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Baltic Journal on Sustainability, doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.224-239
Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement, European Planning Studies, Volume 18, Issue 1
Walker H., Brammer S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 Issue: 2
Zakon o javnim nabavkama Republike Srbije. (2012). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 124/2012, 14/2015, 68/2015. Retrieved from http://www.ujn.gov.rs
Živković, M., Milosavljević, M., Žižović, M. (2016). Multicriteria approach to public procurement for technical sector in Serbian public companies, Fiability and Durability, issue: supplement No1/2016, Publisher Targu Jiu, ISSN 1844-640X, 181-187.