Technological Intensity of Serbian Manufacturing industry in Pre-Covid-19 Period

  • Ivan Nikolic Economics Institute, Belgrade
Keywords: Technological intensity and structure, manufacturing industry, value added, export, FDI

Abstract


This paper analyses technological intesity of Serbian manufacturing sector. The key purpose is to identify development of technological advancment groups (high, medium-high, medium-low and low) during the period of 2010-2019. The analysis shows that in 2019 the share of high-tech production areas in the total MVA increased to 5%, which is the best result since 2015. Changes in production correspond to the movement in foreign trade. The coverage of imports by exports of the manufacturing industry, relatively observed in the medium term, is increasing the fastest in the segment of tangible production, which is included in the category of medium-technological complexity. Serbia is not exclusively competitive in the labour intensive stages of production. It is also competitive in a good part of medium-technological complexity production. Finaly, vast FDI inflows and the activities of foreign investors, in good part, drive successful technological restructuring in recent years.

References

Castaldi, C., M. Cimoli, N. Correa and G. Dosi, (2009). “Technological Learning, Policy Regimes, and Growth: The LongTerm Patterns and Some Specificities of a ‘Globalized’ Economy”, in Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation, edited by M. Cimoli, G. Dosi and J. Stiglitz, Oxford.
Cimoli, M. (1988), “Technological Gaps and Institutional Asymmetries in a NorthSouth Model with a Continuum of Goods”, Metroeconomica; 39; 245 - 274.
Cimoli, M. and Dosi, G. (1995), “Technological Paradigms, Patterns of Learning and Development: an Introductory Roadmap”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5 (3), 242-268.
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1590, Official Journal of the European Union 1.2.2019
Foteini. K, and Nelson, C. (2018). "Industrial development in least developed countries", UNIDO- WORKING PAPER 26/2018
Haraguchi, N., Martorano, B., and Sanfilippo, M. (2018). "What factors drive successful industrialization? Evidence andimplications for developing countries", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Volume 49, June 2019
IMF. (2019). World Economic Outlook, Global Manufacturing Downturn, Rising Trade Barriers, Chapter 1, October 2019
Kaldor, N. (1975), “What is wrong with economic theory?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 89, No. 3
MAT-Macroeconomic Analysis and Trends, publisher Economics Intitute and Serbian Chambers of Commerce, 2020
Nikolić, G. and Nikolić, I. (2020). "THE STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE SERBIAN MERCHANDISE TRADE DURING TRANSITION PROCESS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAIN TRADE INDICATORS", Ekonomika preduzeća, Savez ekonomista Srbije, p.383-399 doi:10.5937/EKOPRE2006383N
Nikolić, I., and Rajić, T. (2019). "STRUCTURAL AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SERBIAN SME SECTOR AT AN AGGREGATE AND INDIVIDUAL LEVEL", p. 339-375. u monografiji: How to prevent SMEs failure (Actions based on comparative analysis in Visegrad countries and Serbia) : monograph : Visegrad+ Grant No. 21820267, Izdavač: University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty Bor, Engineering Management Department (EMD), 2019, 721 str. ISBN 978-86-6305-095-2; COBISS.SR-ID 276434956
Nikolić, I., and Zoroja, M. (2018). "What's Driving the Rapid Growth of Serbian Manufacturing Since 2014? Why Does Technology Matter?", BH Economic Forum, Faculty of Economics - University of Zenica, ISSN: 1986-681X, year 2018, no. 9/2018. ∙ p. 29-41 - , december 2018.
OECD. (2011). ISIC REV. 3 TECHNOLOGY INTENSITY DEFINITION - Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities, p. 6, 7 July, 2011.
Romer P (1990). "Endogenous technological change". Journal of Political Economy, 98(5 pt 2):S71-102
SBRA - Serbian Business Registar Agency Registar, 2020 link: https://www.apr.gov.rs/registers/companies.1786.html
UNCTAD. (2020). The need to protect science, technology and innovation funding during and after the COVID-19 crisis. Policy Brief No. 80.
UNCTAD. (2020a). The LCD REPORT 2020 - Productive capacities for the new decade, United Nations Publications, p.196
UNCTAD. (2020b). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Trade and Development - TRANSITIONING TO A NEW NORMAL, United Nations Publications, p.113
UNIDO. (2020). COVID-19 Implications & Responses - DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION & INDUSTRIAL RECOVERY, june 2020, p. 23
World Economic Forum. (2017). White Paper - Technology and Innovation for the Future of Production: Accelerating Value Creation, p. 38
Published
2020/12/31
Section
Original Scientific Paper