U.S. trade in the sphere of strategic products and services as the first level of analysis of its economic security

  • Marina Todorović /
Keywords: U.S. trade, strategic goods and services, economic security, China

Abstract


The purpose of this research paper is to highlight the importance of the interplay between trade and economic performance, along with the connections among U.S. trade in critical goods and services and its economic security. The scientific paper seeks to elucidate why U.S. trade in strategic goods and services constitutes the primary axis of analysis for its economic security and explore the historical emergence of the concept of economic security. The realm of economic security is largely shaped by the economic policies and foreign trade actions taken by a country. The paper points out that the U.S. foreign trade policy model is among the most sophisticated in the world, if not the most detailed. New findings indicate that three major trends are fundamentally shaping economic security policies — resilience, protection and competition. Strategic competition with China is a cornerstone of U.S. economic security policy. The obtained insights indicate an in-depth examination of the wide range of U.S. foreign economic policy challenges and factors essential to developing strategies for competing with China. Methods used during the research are — the analytical-synthetic method, method of generalization and concretization, method of classification and, also, the historical method and content analysis method.

References

117th Congress (2021-2022), H.R.4346 - CHIPS and Science Act, Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346
Atlantic Council. (2023). Global Strategy 2023: Winning the tech race with China. Washington DC, U.S.: Engelke, P. & Weinstein, E. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/atlantic-council-strategy-paper-series/global-strategy-2023-winning-the-tech-race-with-china/
Bjelić, P. (2002). Model američke spoljnotrgovinske politike. Međunarodni problemi, 54 (1-2), 115-130. doi: 10.2298/MEDJP0201006B
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2024). Toward a U.S. Economic Security Strategy. Washington DC, U.S.: Benson, E., Mouradian, C., & Palazzi, A. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2024-07/240709_Benson_Economic_Security.pdf?VersionId=sd_v9nFcx.vOGPht3HtM.TwxbpaLAkPr
CIA. (2024). The World Factbook. Washington DC, U.S.: CIA. Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/
Dent, C. (2007). Economic Security. In A. Collins (ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 204-223). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ejdus, F. (2024). Međunarodna bezbednost - Teorije, Sektori i Nivoi. Beograd: Clio.
RAND Corporation. (2023). Economic Security and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Santa Monica, U.S.: Gerstein, D. & Ligor, D. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA2200/PEA2210-1/RAND_PEA2210-1.pdf
Richardson, J. D. (1990). The political economy of strategic trade policy. International Organization, 44 (1), 107-135. doi:10.1017/S0020818300004665
The United States Studies Centre. (2024). Economic security policies compared: The United States, its allies and partners. University of Sydney, Australia: Edmonstone, G. https://www.ussc.edu.au/economic-security-policies-compared-the-united-states-its-allies-and-partners
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2021). Public goods for sustainable development: Rethinking policies and strategies (Policy Brief No. 90). New York, U.S.: Jimenez, M. A. & Roig, M. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/PB_90.pdf
Published
2024/12/20
Section
Scientific Review