SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY BY CONSTRUCTING THE PARETO TUPLE
Abstract
The system to ensure manufacturability of industrial products is aimed at reducing the costs of all types of resources at the stages of their life cycle, selecting the most competitive in cost and functionality designs at the early stages of engineering. When assessing the new designs for manufacturability to be developed and selecting the best analogue or basic reference standard in terms of manufacturability, the engineer faces the need to apply multicriteria optimization methods. The solution of the applied task of design optimization by quantitative criteria of manufacturability in the conditions of an uncertain design and production environment is considered in the article as implementable in the system for ensuring design for manufacturability. The decisive rules for implementing the multi-step process of ranking the design options according to the manufacturability criteria with the construction of the Pareto tuple are formed. The implementation of the method is exemplified in practice when choosing the oscilloscope design that is advantageous in terms of manufacturability at a mass-production instrument-making plant.
References
Anderson, D.M. (2014). Design for Manufacturabili¬ty: How to use concurrent engineering to rapidly de¬velop low-cost high-quality products for lean produc¬tion. New York: Productivity Press. DOI: 10.1201/ b16501.
Selvaraj, P., Radhakrishnan, P. and Adithan, M. (2009). An integrated approach to design for manu¬facturing and assembly based on reduction of product development time and cost. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 13-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1580-8.
Barnawal, P., Dorneich, M.C., Peters, F. and Frank, M.C. (2016). Design and evaluation of designer feedback system in design for manufacturability.Pro¬ceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics So¬ciety Annual Meeting, Vol. 59, No 1, 1142-1146. DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591167.
Gupta, S.K., Regli, W.C., Das, D. and Nau, D.S. (1997). Automated manufacturability analysis: a sur¬vey. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 9, No 3, 168-190.
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M., Ridgman, T.W. and Clarkson, P.J. (2015). A FBS Linkage ontology and technique to support engineering change manage¬ment.Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 26, No 1, 3-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00163-014-0181-9.
Shukor, S.A. and Axinte, D. (2009). Manufacturabil¬ity analysis system: issues and future trends. Inter¬national Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, 1369-1390. DOI: 10.1080/00207540701589398.
Zhou, Yu. and Saitou, K. (2014). Identification of manufacturability constraints through process sim¬ulation and data mining, 19th Design for Manufac¬turing and the Life Cycle Conference, Buffalo, New York, USA. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2014-34542.
Cochrane, S., Young, R., Case, K., Harding, J., Gao, J., Dani, Sh. and Baxter, D. (2008). Knowl¬edge reuse in manufacturability analysis. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, No 4, 508-513. DOI:10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.003.
Young, R.I.M, Guerra, D., Gunendran, G., Das, B., Cochrane, S. and Cutting-Decelle, A-F. (2005). Shar¬ing manufacturing information and knowledge in de¬sign decision support. In: A. Bramley, D. Brissaud, D. Coutellier and McMahon, C. (Eds.), Advances in integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering (pp. 173-188), Netherlands: Springer.
Menold, J., Simpson, T.W. and Jablokow, K. (2018). The prototype for X framework: exploring the effects of a structured prototyping framework on functional prototypes. Research in Engineering Design, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-018-0289-4.
Salhieh,S.M. (2008). Developing manufacturing re¬sponse models to predict the manufacturability of new modular products. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 39, No 5–6, 599-611. DOI:10.1007/s00170-007-1232-4.
Irzaev, G.Kh. (2018). Multicriteria analysis of prod¬uct operational effectiveness at design stages. 1th International Conference on Mechanical Engineer¬ing, Automation and Control Systems, MEACS 2017, Tomsk, Russian Federation, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 327, Issue 2, 022-049, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/327/2/022049.
Lynn, R., Saldana, Ch., Kurfess, T., Reddy, N., Simpson, T., Jablokow, K., Tucker, T., Tedia, S. and Williams, Ch. (2016). Toward rapid manufacturabil¬ity analysis tools for engineering design education. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 5, 1183-1196, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.093.
Sharma, R. and Gao, J.X. (2007). A knowl¬edge-based manufacturing and cost evaluation sys¬tem for product design/re-design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 33, No 9-10, 856-865.DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006- 0530-6.
Kim, Yu-Gyeong, Jung, Yung-Jin, Kim, Hyun-Soo and Ahn, Hee-Jae. (2015). Design assessment of tri¬angular support bracket for manufacturability. Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 98–99, 1519-1523, DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.004.
Zhang, Jiang-Long, Zhang, Zheng and Han, Yu. (2017). Research on manufacturability optimiza¬tion of discrete products with 3D printing involved and lot-size considered. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 43, No 1, 150-159, DOI:10.1016/j. jmsy.2017.03.002.
Trobe-Bateman, J. La and Wild,D. (2003). Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of man¬ufacturability to optimize product design and devel¬opment. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14, No 2, (2003), 107-117.
Irzaev, G.Kh. (2007). Expert selection of the pre¬ferred option for manufacturability products by ana¬lytical hierarchy. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Tech¬nical University. Vol. 29, No 1, 126-130.
Roy, B. (1968). Classementetchoixen presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE). RAIRO - Operations Research – Recherche Opera¬tionnelle, Vol. 2, No. V1, 57-75.
