BEHAVIOR OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE WALL PANELS WITH SQUARE OPENING VARIATIONS SUBJECTED TO CYCLIC LOADS

  • Saloma Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indralaya, Indonesia
  • Siti Aisyah Nurjannah Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indralaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-592X
  • Hanafiah Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indralaya, Indonesia
  • Arie Putra Usman Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indralaya, Indonesia
  • Steven Hu Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indralaya, Indonesia
  • Fathoni Usman Department of Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
Keywords: cyclic lateral loads, finite element method, geopolymer concrete, wall panel

Abstract


Masonry walls are non-structural elements that can increase the stiffness and strength of building structures subjected to lateral loads. Reinforced concrete (RC) wall systems are structural elements that have been developed to improve structural performance. Because the use of large amounts of cement in RC is not environmentally friendly, cement-free concrete called geopolymer concrete (GC) has been developed. Research on GC structural beam-column joints and slab joints has proven that GC fulfils the strength requirements for structural elements. However, previous studies have not addressed the performance of reinforced GC wall panels (WPs) under cyclic loads. Therefore, this study filled the gap with the novelty of investigating the performance of reinforced GC structural WPs subjected to cyclic lateral loads. Numerical analysis was used to determine the performance of GC-WPs in resisting cyclic lateral loads, and an aerated concrete wall panel (AC-WP) model was used for verification. The study investigated GC-WPs that were 1500 mm wide and 200 mm thick, varying in solidity such that one was entirely solid (GC-WP1) and two had square openings in horizontal and vertical configurations (GC-WP2 and GC-WP3, respectively). The cyclic loading history referenced FEMA 461. The analysis resulted in hysteretic curves, ductility ratios, and stress contours. GC-WP1 achieved the highest maximum lateral loads (73,994 kN and -67,225 kN) compared to the other GC-WP models, with a high ductility ratio of 14,681. Results show that GC has the potential for use in WPs to improve their resistance to lateral cyclic loads.

References

Asadi, I., Baghban, M.H., Hashemi, M., Izadyar, N., Sajadi, B. (2022). Phase change materials incorporated into geopolymer concrete for enhancing energy efficiency and sustainability of buildings: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 17, e01162, pp, 1-17, DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01162.

Masoule, M.S.T., Bahrami, N., Karimzadeh, M., Mohasanati, B., Shoaei, P., Ameri, F., Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2022). Lightweight geopolymer concrete: A critical review on the feasibility, mixture design, durability properties, and microstructure. Ceramics International, vol. 48, pp. 10347–10371, DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.298.

Nergis, D.D.B., Abdullah, M.M.A.B., Vizureanu, P., Tahir, M.F.M. (2018). Geopolymers and Their Uses: Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 374, 012019, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/374/1/012019.

Ouni, M.H.E., Raza, A., Haider, H., Arshad, M., Azab, M., Elhag, A.B. (2023). Behavior of alkali-activated coal ash basalt fiber-reinforced geopolymer nanocomposite incorporated with nano sodium oxide. Materials Letters, vol. 335, 133850, DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.133850.

Raza, A., Azab, M., Baki, Z.A., Hachem, C.E., Ouni, M.H.E., Kahla, N.B. (2023). Experimental study on mechanical, toughness, and microstructural characteristics of micro-carbon fiber-reinforced geopolymer having nano . Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 64, pp. 451–463, DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.001.

Mao, Y., Hwang, H-J., Du, Y., Su, J., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Shi, C. (2022). Bond and anchorage performance of beam flexural bars in beam-column joints using slag-based geopolymer concrete and their effect on seismic performance. Engineering Structures, vol. 273, 115062, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115062.

Yang, Y., Fang, S., Feng, W., Wan, S., Li, L., Tang, Y. (2023). Flexural and compressive performance of BFRP-reinforced geopolymer sea-sand concrete beams and columns: Experimental and analytical investigation. Composite Structures, vol. 318, 117089, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117089.

Choudhury, A.H., Laskar, A.I., (2021). Rehabilitation of substandard beam-column joint using geopolymer. Engineering Structures, vol. 238, 112241, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112241.

Huang, J-Q., Kumar, S., Dai, J-G. (2023). Flexural performance of steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete one-way slabs: Experimental and numerical investigations. Construction and Building Materials, vol. 366, 130098, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130098.

Zhang, H.Y., Liu, H.Y., Kodur, V. Li, M.Y., Zhou, Y. (2022) Flexural behavior of concrete slabs strengthened with textile reinforced geopolymer mortar. Composite Structures, vol. 284, 115220, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115220.

Cholostiakow, S., Koutas, L.N., Papakonstantinou, C.G. (2023). Geopolymer versus cement-based textile-reinforced mortar: Diagonal compression tests on masonry walls representative of infills in RC frames. Construction and Building Materials, vol. 373, 130836, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130836.

Buyuktapu, M., Maras, M.M. (2023). Optimization of production parameters of novel hybrid fiber-reinforced geopolymer mortar: Application in masonry walls. Structures, vol. 53, pp. 1300–1317, DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.031.

Arslan, M.E., Celebi, E. (2019). An Experimental Study on Cyclic Behavior of Aerated Concrete Block Masonry Walls Retrofitted with Different Methods. Construction and Building Materials, vol. 200, pp 226–239, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.132.

Kumar, S., Chen, B., Xu, Y., Dai, J.G. (2022). Axial-flexural behavior of FRP grid-reinforced geopolymer concrete sandwich wall panels enabled with FRP connectors. Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 47, 103907, pp 1-21, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103907.

Zhong, Y.C., Xiong, F., Ran, M.M., Chen, J., Ge, Q., Lu, Y. (2022). Seismic behavior of a novel bolt-connected horizontal joint for precast RC wall panel structures: Experimental and numerical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 52, 104451, pp 1-22, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104451.

Zhang, C., Wu, J., Huang, W., Wang, H., Gao, J. (2021). Experimental and numerical study on seismic performance of semi-rigid steel frame infilled with prefabricated damping wall panels. Engineering Structures, vol. 246, 113056, pp 1-15, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113056.

Abdel-Jaber, M., El-Nimri, R. (2022). Comparative investigation, numerical modeling, and buckling analysis of one-way reinforced concrete wall panels. Results in Engineering, vol. 14, 100459, pp 1-10, DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100459.

Kulkarni, A., Shafei, B. (2021). Ultra-high performance concrete building wall panels engineered to resist windborne debris impact. Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 42, 103004, pp 1-14, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103004.

Zulfiati, R., Saloma, Idris, Y. (2019). Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer with Natural Fiber. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1198, 082021, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1198/8/082021.

Fragomeni, S., Doh, J.H., Lee, D.J. (2012). Behavior of Axially Loaded Concrete Wall Panels with Openings: An Experimental Study. Advances in Structural Engineering, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1345-1358, DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.15.8.1345.

Applied Technology Council. (2007). FEMA 461 Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Non-structural Components. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Redwood City California, http://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/FEMA461.pdf.>

ANSYS Inc. (2019). ANSYS 19 Mechanical APDL, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.

Budiono, B., Dewi, N.T.H., Lim, E. (2019). Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 762-771, DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2019.51.6.2.

Nurjannah, S.A., Saloma, Idris, Y., Usman, A.P., Juliantina, I., Aprilia, C. (2022). The Behavior of Interior Beam-Column Joint Models Using Self-Compacting Concrete with Variations of Shear Reinforcement Subjected to Cyclic Lateral Loads. Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1574-1589, DOI: 10.13189/cea.2022.100427.

Abusafaqa, F.R., Samaaneh, M.A., Dwaikat, M.B.M. (2022). Improving ductility behavior of sway-special exterior beam-column joint using ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Structures, vol. 36, pp 979–996, DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.059.

Nurjannah, S.A., Saloma, Usman, A.P., Wibowo, M.L.P.P. (2022). A Numerical Study of the Comparison of Normal Concrete and Light Weight Concrete Exterior Beam-Column Joints Behavior to Cyclic Lateral Loads. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 765-777, DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-36140.

Wu, H., Zhuang, X., Zhang, W., Zhao, Z. (2022). Anisotropic ductile fracture: Experiments, modeling, and numerical simulations. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 20, pp 833-856, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.128.

Nurjannah, S.A., Saloma, Yulindasari, Aminuddin, K.M., Chuhairy, G. (2023). The analysis of numerical self-compacting concrete wall panel models with variations of shear reinforcement. Engineering Solid Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 89-102, DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2022.8.002.

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency 356, Washington D.C.

Batarlar, B., Saatci, S. (2022). Numerical investigation on the behavior of reinforced concrete slabs strengthened with carbon fiber textile reinforcement under impact loads. Structures, vol. 41, pp. 1164–1177, DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.057.

Zhang, Q., Yang, Q-C., Li, W-J, Gu, X-L., Dai, H-H. (2023). Study on model of flexure response of carbon fiber textile reinforced concrete (CTRC) sheets with short AR-glass fibers. Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 18, e01791, pp. 1-20, DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01791.

Published
2023/09/03
Section
Original Scientific Paper