OPTIMIZATION OF ELECTROSPINNING PARAMETERS USING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK (ANN) MODEL FOR ENHANCED NANOFIBER PRODUCTION
Abstract
Electrospinning is a simple and cost-effective technique for creating nanofibers with diverse applications.Optimizing electrospinning parameters is crucial for producing nanofibers with desirable attributes, such as uniform diameter and bead-free morphology.Conventional trial-and-error strategies are frequently protracted and may not necessarily result in optimal outcomes. This investigation delineates the formulation of an artificial neural network (ANN) model specifically designed to systematically optimize electrospinning parameters. Crucial input variables, such as applied voltage, feed rate, and polymer concentration, were utilized to train the ANN model, which was constructed with multiple hidden layers to effectively encapsulate the intricate relationships between input parameters and the resultant nanofiber properties. In this research, an ANN was devised with a 4-3-1 architecture that was trained on a dataset extrapolated from experimental data documented in prior literature and employed the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to ascertain robust performance. Upon validation, the model proficiently predicted optimal parameters conducive to the production of smooth, bead-free nanofibers. The model achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.77%, which is lower than previous models for predicting electrospun Kefiran nanofiber diameter.The results indicate that the ANN-based methodology substantially augments the efficiency and precision of electrospinning parameter optimization, thereby providing a significant resource for researchers and engineers engaged in the domain of nanomaterials. Future investigations could delve into the application of this model to various polymer systems and further refine the ANN architecture to accommodate more intricate electrospinning configurations.
References
Esnaashari SS, Naghibzadeh M, Adabi M, Faridi-Majidi R (2017) Evaluation of the effective electrospinning parameters controlling Kefiran nanofibers diameter using modelling artificial neural networks. Nanomedicine Research Journal 2:239–249. https://doi.org/10.22034/NMRJ.2017.04.005
Mirzaei E, Amani A, Sarkar S, et al (2012) Artificial neural networks modeling of electrospinning of polyethylene oxide from aqueous acid acetic solution. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 125:1910–1921. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36319
Sarkar K, Ghalia M Ben, Wu Z, Bose SC (2009) A neural network model for the numerical prediction of the diameter of electro-spun polyethylene oxide nanofibers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209:3156–3165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.032
Samadian H, Zakariaee SS, Adabi M, et al (2016) Effective parameters on conductivity of mineralized carbon nanofibers: an investigation using artificial neural networks. RSC Advances 6:111908–111918. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21596c
Ma M, Zhou H, Gao S, et al (2023) Analysis and Prediction of Electrospun Nanofiber Diameter Based on Artificial Neural Network. Polymers 15:2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132813
Karimi MA, Pourhakkak P, Adabi M, et al (2015) Using an artificial neural network for the evaluation of the parameters controlling PVA/chitosan electrospun nanofibers diameter. E-Polymers 15:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2014-0198
Yilmaz C, Ustun D, Akdagli A (2017) Usage of artificial neural network for estimating of the electrospun nanofiber diameter. IDAP 2017 - International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAP.2017.8090329
Abdelhady SS, Atta MM, Megahed AA, et al (2022) Modeling electrospun PLGA nanofibers’ diameter using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. Journal of Industrial Textiles 52:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837221142641
Khanlou HM, Sadollah A, Ang BC, et al (2014) Prediction and optimization of electrospinning parameters for polymethyl methacrylate nanofiber fabrication using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications 25:767–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1554-8
Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM, Khamforoush M (2013) Comparison between artificial neural network and response surface methodology in the prediction of the production rate of polyacrylonitrile electrospun nanofibers. Fibers and Polymers 14:1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1849-x
Moradi Z, Kalanpour N (2019) Kefiran, a branched polysaccharide: Preparation, properties and applications: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 223:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115100
Ghasemlou M, Khodaiyan F, Jahanbin K, et al (2012) Structural investigation and response surface optimisation for improvement of kefiran production yield from a low-cost culture medium. Food Chemistry 133:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.046