IDENTIFYING RELEVANT SUSTAINABILITY COMPONENTS FOR LOCAL ROAD PAVEMENT

Fajar Sri Handayani; Florentina Pungky Pramesti; Ary Setyawan; Senot Sangadji

doi:10.5937/jaes0-54018

Fajar Sri Handayani Sebelas Maret University, Engineering Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Surakarta, Indonesia
Florentina Pungky Pramesti Sebelas Maret University, Engineering Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Surakarta, Indonesia
Ary Setyawan Sebelas Maret University, Engineering Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Surakarta, Indonesia
Senot Sangadji Sebelas Maret University, Engineering Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-54018

Keywords: sustainability, relevant component, Delphi method, local road

Abstract

To ensure our sustainable future, the whole lifecycle of our current and newly built infrastructure must satisfy sustainable standard, focusing Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 13. It should meet functional requirements of reducing negative impacts to the environment while at the same time support economic growth and societal development. Due to its vast network, local roads may contribute to sustainable living assuming that it is designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in such a way that satisfy sustainable standard. Despite the fact that sustainable road rating systems have been developed in many countries, there is no agreement on the components for defining and measuring local road sustainability, especially in developing countries. In facilitating the development of the future local road sustainability index, this paper attempts to identify the components by finding insights and agreement from experts. In this case Delphi technique was employed. Seventeen components were specified consists of eleven environmental components, three economic components, and two social components. This means that the achievement of local roads sustainability integrates the three aspects; environmental stewardship, economic growth, and social development.

References

Hansmann, R., Mieg, H. A., & Frischknecht, P. (2012). Principal sustainability components: Empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. International Journal Sustainable Development World Ecology, vol. 19, no. 5, 451–459, DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2012.696220.

Hassan, A. M., & Lee, H. (2014). The paradox of the sustainable city : definitions and examples. Environ Dev Sustain, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-014-9604-z.

Huang, L., Wu, J., & Yan, L. (2015). Defining and measuring urban sustainability : a review of indicators. Landscape Ecol. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2.

Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities : An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, vol. 10, 407–418, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013.

Michael, F. L., Noor, Z. Z., & Figueroa, M. J. (2014). Review of urban sustainability indicators assessment- Case study between Asian countries. Habitat Interbational, vol. 44, 491–500, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.09.006.

Handayani, F. S., Pramesti, F. P., Wibowo, M. A., & Setyawan A. (2019). Estimating and reducing the release of Greenhouse Gases in local road pavement constructions. International Journal Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, 1709–1715, DOI: 10.18517/ijaseit.9.5.9705.

Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth’s Future, vol. 5, no. 11, 1169–1179, DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000632.

Meijering, J. V., Kern K., & Tobi, H. (2014). Identifying the methodological characteristics of European green city rankings. Ecological Indicators, vol. 43, 132–142, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.026.

Lohuis, A. M., van Vuuren, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2014). Context-specific definitions of organizational concepts: Defining 'team effectiveness' with use of Delphi Technique. Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 19 no. 06, 706–720, DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2014.10.

Ferguson, N. D., Davis, A. M., Slutsky, A. S., & Stewart, T., E. (2005). Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique. Journal of Critical Care, no. 20, 147–154, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.03.001.

Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, 2826–2840, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034.

De Brito, M. M., Evers, M., & Höllermann, B. (2017). Prioritization of flood vulnerability, coping capacity and exposure indicators through the Delphi technique : A case study in Taquari-Antas basin , Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 24, 119–128, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.027.

Meijering, J. V., Kampen, J. K., & Tobi,H. (2013). Quantifying the development of agreement among experts in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 80, no. 8, 1607–1614, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.003.

Rietbergen-mccracken, J., & Narayan, D. (1998). Participation and Social Assessment : Tool and Techniques. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, D.C, USA.

Giannarou, L., & Zervas, E. (2014). Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. International Journal of Business Science Applied Management, vol. 9, no. 2, 65–82, :10.69864/ijbsam.9-2.106.

NYSDOT., (2010). New York State Departement of Transportation. NYSDOT sustainability&GreenLITES.

Muench, S., Anderson, J., & Hatfield, J. (2011). Greenroads Manual v1. Seattle. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Greenroads+Manual+v1.5#0

Vicroads, (2011). Integrated Vicroads Environmental Sustainability Tool (INVEST). Washiington DC: Vicroads Environmental Sustainability, Federal Highway Administration Washington DC.

Knuth, D., & Fortmann, J. (2011). The Development of I-LAST TM Illinois - Livable and Sustainable Transportation,” pp. 495–503.

Wilis, G. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983655

Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P.W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, no. 4, 401–409, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.

Shah, H. A. (2009). Which Is the Best Parametric Statistical Method For Analyzing Delphi Data ?. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, vol. 8, no. 1, 226-232, DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1241137140.

Von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 79, 1525–1536, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013.

Alshehri, S. A., Rezgui, Y., & Li, H. (2015). Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster. Nat. Hazards, vol. 75, 2221–2245, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x.

Sita, T., Mulyono, A. T., & Utomo, S.H. (2023). Analyzing the Effect of Road Performance Indicators on Penalties for Late Fulfillment in Road Service Levels. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, vol. 21, no. 1, 176–187, DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-39785.