PREANALYTICAL ERRORS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SAMPLES: INVESTIGATING ERROR SOURCES

  • Adolfo Romero
  • Juan Gómez-Salgado
  • Adolfo Romero-Arana
  • José Antonio Gómez-Fernández
  • Andrés Cobos
  • María Carmen Ramos
  • María Rosa Iglesias
Keywords: emergency hospital service, hospital laboratory, preanalytical phase errors, qualitative research

Abstract


Background: The presence of preanalytical errors is arecurring fact in all areas of healthcare that send samples to laboratories. Increasing the knowledge of possible sources of error in the preanalytical phase has been the objective of this group during the last 10 years.
Methods: In this study, descriptive research has been carried out using professionals’ opinions obtained by means of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats method in a focus group.
Results: The opinions expressed within the focus group have emphasised the importance of patients’ safety andwillingness for the introduction of a computerized analytical module. The most commented weakness in both hospitals was the transport of samples through the pneumatic tube.
Improving the duration of workers’ contracts, especially in the laboratory, and creating a circuit for professional’s localization during the work shift to facilitate potential error solving are some opportunities for the future.

Conclusions: Different approaches have been developed depending on the healthcare scenario. For this, establishing a flow of information between the different professionals allows identifying identical aspects through a priori, different points of view. The line to follow is to improve the safety of the patient and also to give professionals an opportunity to express themselves.

References

Romero Ruiz A. Fuentes de error en la toma de muestras sanguíneas. Recomendaciones para la fase preanalítica. Metas de Enferm 2007; 10(6): 55–60.

Dreisinger N, Zapolsky N. Ethics in the Pediatric Emergency Department: When Mistakes Happen: An Approach to the Process, Evaluation, and Response to Medical Errors. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017; 33: 128–31.

Ferreras Amez JM, Sarrat Torres MA, Arribas Entrala B, et al. Reducción de la determinación de coagulación en las pruebas analíticas básicas en los servicios de urgencias. Emergencias 2017; 29: 109–12.

Salinas M, López M, Uris J, et al. Variabilidad en la oferta y en la solicitud de determinaciones de laboratorio en pacientes de servicios de urgencias hospitalarios. Emergencias 2014; 26: 450–8.

Gómez-Salgado J, Romero A, Caparrós IS, et al. Pre-analytical errors: a preliminary approach to the point of view of primary health caregivers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53: 225–9.

Gómez-Salgado J, Romero A, Cobos A, et al. Pre analytical errors: the professionals' perspective. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014; 52: 53–5.

Romero A, Gómez-Salgado J, Romero-Arana A, RuizFrutos, C. Utilization of a healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to identify error sources in the preanalytical phase in two tertiary hospital laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2018; 28(2): 020713.

Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, et al. Pre-analytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51: 229–41.

Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Project management in laboratory medicine. J Med Biochem 2019; 38: 401–6.

Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1348–51.

Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem 2007; 53: 1338–42.

Giavarina D, Lippi G. Blood venous sample collection: Recommendations overview and a checklist to improve quality. Clin Biochem 2017; 25: S0009–9120(17)30090–5.

Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Biological samples transportation by drones: ready for prime time? Anals Translational Med 2016; 4: 5.

Cakirca G, Erdal, H. The Effect of Pneumatic Tube Systems on the Hemolysis of Biochemistry Blood Samples. Journal of Emergency Nursing 2017; 43(3): 255–8.

Arslan DF, Karakoyun I, Isbilen B, Basok, Aksit ZM, Celik E, Dogan K, Duman C. The effects of education and preanalytical errors. J Med Biochem 2018; 37; 172–80.

Published
2020/02/17
Section
Original paper